He_Gawn Posted April 14, 2005 Share Posted April 14, 2005 Now lets f***ing sweep this time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnB Posted April 14, 2005 Share Posted April 14, 2005 SOLID SOLID W Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sox It To Em Posted April 14, 2005 Share Posted April 14, 2005 Put another in the win column. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AddisonStSox Posted April 14, 2005 Share Posted April 14, 2005 Chevy player of the game: The Sox bullpen. Can they do that? Who cares! It's a White Sox Winner! One more tomorrow, see ya then! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daa84 Posted April 14, 2005 Share Posted April 14, 2005 QUOTE(WilliamTell @ Apr 13, 2005 -> 08:01 PM) YEAH SOX!! WAY TO GO!! hell of a job by the sox pen tonight, marte vizcaino and hermanson combining for 3.1 innings giving up just that hafner double Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elrockinMT Posted April 14, 2005 Share Posted April 14, 2005 You gotta love it. Sox are the winners. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Punch and Judy Garland Posted April 14, 2005 Share Posted April 14, 2005 I figured we'd pound Lee. Nto so much but we got to him. I like our chances with the Duke vs. Elarton. Let's go for the throat this time Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GreatScott82 Posted April 14, 2005 Share Posted April 14, 2005 QUOTE(He_Gawn @ Apr 14, 2005 -> 02:01 AM) Now lets f***ing sweep this time. Its our 3rd chance to get a sweep! Lets convert this time! Big win tonite. Awesome job by the pen. Contreras start was shaky, but found himself later on. What a scrappy win. I'm lovin it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jackie hayes Posted April 14, 2005 Share Posted April 14, 2005 Ohhhhhhhh.... Jose scares me. I'm glad he gathered it all in, but boy, we need more out of him. Anyway, great win, I want a darn sweep already! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gene Honda Civic Posted April 14, 2005 Share Posted April 14, 2005 I ran the Win percentage stuff again for today's game -- I'll make a pretty graph later tonight. --- Here's the data, not that you care. Team Player Off Pitch Field WPA Injuns Wickman 0.000 0.142 0.000 0.142 Sizemore 0.110 0.000 0.000 0.110 Rhodes 0.000 0.110 0.000 0.110 Hafner 0.061 0.000 0.000 0.061 Lee 0.000 0.045 0.000 0.045 Crisp 0.044 0.000 0.000 0.044 Broussard 0.037 0.000 0.000 0.037 Peralta -0.011 0.000 0.000 -0.011 Cora -0.048 0.000 0.000 -0.048 Boone -0.054 0.000 0.000 -0.054 Ludwick -0.119 0.000 0.000 -0.119 Belliard -0.138 0.000 0.000 -0.138 Miller 0.000 -0.160 0.000 -0.160 Martinez -0.246 0.000 0.021 -0.225 Howry 0.000 -0.293 0.000 -0.293 Injuns Total -0.364 -0.156 0.021 -0.499 Sox Crede 0.284 0.000 0.000 0.284 Hermanson 0.000 0.207 0.000 0.207 Rowand 0.168 0.000 0.000 0.168 Vizcaino 0.000 0.153 0.000 0.153 Marte 0.000 0.104 0.000 0.104 Everett 0.098 0.000 0.000 0.098 Pierzynski 0.061 0.000 -0.009 0.052 Ozuna -0.001 0.000 -0.003 -0.004 Uribe -0.037 0.000 0.015 -0.022 Perez -0.024 0.000 0.000 -0.024 Iguchi -0.071 0.000 0.000 -0.071 The Count 0.000 -0.099 0.000 -0.099 Dye -0.148 0.000 -0.004 -0.152 Konerko -0.194 0.000 0.000 -0.194 Sox Total 0.135 0.364 -0.001 0.499 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jackie hayes Posted April 14, 2005 Share Posted April 14, 2005 QUOTE(Gene Honda Civic @ Apr 14, 2005 -> 02:11 AM) I ran the Win percentage stuff again for today's game -- I'll make a pretty graph later tonight. --- Here's the data, not that you care. Actually -- I think this is pretty neat stuff. This method is based (I think) on the calculations done a couple years ago by some Yale economics professor. I recall reading an article on this a little while back, and thinking it was a great idea, and not too difficult to reproduce when you organize the data. So I'm curious about it, now that someone's taken the time to work it all up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CWSGuy406 Posted April 14, 2005 Share Posted April 14, 2005 Same here, jackie. It gives a statistical basis to what I'm seeing with my eyes. I like that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qwerty Posted April 14, 2005 Share Posted April 14, 2005 I want jugger's statistics not cheat's generic bulls***. :rolly Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3E8 Posted April 14, 2005 Share Posted April 14, 2005 Was there any word throughout the game on the status of Podsednik? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greasywheels121 Posted April 14, 2005 Share Posted April 14, 2005 QUOTE(3E8 @ Apr 13, 2005 -> 09:29 PM) Was there any word throughout the game on the status of Podsednik? From the article on Chisox.com, it appears he's fine. They just understand how valuable he is, and they're just being cautious. http://whitesox.mlb.com/NASApp/mlb/news/ar...t=.jsp&c_id=cws Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3E8 Posted April 14, 2005 Share Posted April 14, 2005 QUOTE(greasywheels121 @ Apr 13, 2005 -> 08:30 PM) From the article on Chisox.com, it appears he's fine. They just understand how valuable he is, and they're just being cautious. http://whitesox.mlb.com/NASApp/mlb/news/ar...t=.jsp&c_id=cws Thank you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ptatc Posted April 14, 2005 Share Posted April 14, 2005 QUOTE(greasywheels121 @ Apr 13, 2005 -> 08:30 PM) From the article on Chisox.com, it appears he's fine. They just understand how valuable he is, and they're just being cautious. http://whitesox.mlb.com/NASApp/mlb/news/ar...t=.jsp&c_id=cws It's kind of picky but the article said the abductor muscle. These are the muscles usually associated with hip pointers not the groin muscles. The adductors are the groin. Ihope the writer just got it wrong like they usually do, otherwise the problem is worse then they thought. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gene Honda Civic Posted April 14, 2005 Share Posted April 14, 2005 QUOTE(Gene Honda Civic @ Apr 13, 2005 -> 09:11 PM) I ran the Win percentage stuff again for today's game -- I'll make a pretty graph later tonight. --- Here's the data, not that you care. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3E8 Posted April 14, 2005 Share Posted April 14, 2005 (edited) That is a thing of beauty. EDIT: Gene, what are you plotting the pecentages against? I mean, what are you putting into Excel? Edited April 14, 2005 by 3E8 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gene Honda Civic Posted April 14, 2005 Share Posted April 14, 2005 QUOTE(3E8 @ Apr 13, 2005 -> 10:46 PM) That is a thing of beauty. EDIT: Gene, what are you plotting the pecentages against? I mean, what are you putting into Excel? The time axis is just plays... I don't put it on there because some innings are longer than others, and number of plays would just be plain confusing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3E8 Posted April 14, 2005 Share Posted April 14, 2005 QUOTE(Gene Honda Civic @ Apr 13, 2005 -> 09:49 PM) The time axis is just plays... I don't put it on there because some innings are longer than others, and number of plays would just be plain confusing. I know each is a play, but what are you actually inputting into excel for your x-axis? Just 1,2,3,4...? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gene Honda Civic Posted April 14, 2005 Share Posted April 14, 2005 QUOTE(3E8 @ Apr 13, 2005 -> 10:58 PM) I know each is a play, but what are you actually inputting into excel for your x-axis? Just 1,2,3,4...? Yeah I just run a column of acsending numbers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DonkeyKongerko Posted April 14, 2005 Share Posted April 14, 2005 I wonder what happens to the percentage if you put in Shingo (or Koch for laughs). Guess it's time to trade Paulie and Dye. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KipWellsFan Posted April 14, 2005 Share Posted April 14, 2005 Thanks for that cheat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YASNY Posted April 14, 2005 Share Posted April 14, 2005 QUOTE(Punch and Judy Garland @ Apr 13, 2005 -> 08:20 PM) He's a passable outfielder for a few innings. Not ideal, but passable. He plays none particualry well but can play all three which is nice. Frank will be back soon in the grand scheme of things. Just a month or so away Rowand. Podsednik. Harris. Perez. .... Options 1 thru 4 in CF. There is no reason to ever put Everett near CF again. EVER! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts