SoxFan1 Posted April 23, 2005 Share Posted April 23, 2005 Imagine that.......Gardner/Mush PLUS Johnson/Jones/RB and the 25th........rape! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CWSGuy406 Posted April 23, 2005 Share Posted April 23, 2005 Tru, we don't need Ware. We already have Brown/Haynes/Ogunlye on the ends. Then again, I might be thinking of the wrong guy, but isn't Ware good enough to where he can adjust to playing OLB? If we do go that route -- and trade to get the #9 and #25 and an extra pick, I'd love to grab Derrick Johnson there... And then grab your WR/TE at #25. Please, someone tell me that I'm a f***ing nut for liking Johnson so damn much. Someone, please... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T R U Posted April 23, 2005 Share Posted April 23, 2005 (edited) QUOTE(CWSGuy406 @ Apr 22, 2005 -> 09:02 PM) Tru, we don't need Ware. We already have Brown/Haynes/Ogunlye on the ends. Then again, I might be thinking of the wrong guy, but isn't Ware good enough to where he can adjust to playing OLB? If we do go that route -- and trade to get the #9 and #25 and an extra pick, I'd love to grab Derrick Johnson there... And then grab your WR/TE at #25. Please, someone tell me that I'm a f***ing nut for liking Johnson so damn much. Someone, please... Ware can play OLB, thats what I was projecting him as oh yeah, and your not nuts, Johnson is an animal Edited April 23, 2005 by T R U Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoxFan1 Posted April 23, 2005 Share Posted April 23, 2005 QUOTE(CWSGuy406 @ Apr 22, 2005 -> 11:02 PM) Please, someone tell me that I'm a f***ing nut for liking Johnson so damn much. Someone, please... Nope.......he is a stud. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soxbadger Posted April 23, 2005 Share Posted April 23, 2005 If we are picking lb, then it would be Johnson or Merriman. I doubt a 4-3 team will take Ware. SB Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CWSGuy406 Posted April 23, 2005 Share Posted April 23, 2005 Then why might Johnson fall to Detroit at #10? Ray Lewis is the type of player that can single-handedly change a game. And I realize that you can say that about a few of the WR's/RB's in the draft, too. I dunno, I guess I'd think that a player who people are comparing to Ray Lewis would be thought of a little higher... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GoodAsGould Posted April 23, 2005 Share Posted April 23, 2005 If that trade happened and we could get DJ at #9 than Clayton at #25.... id be ecstatic. And since we have a high 2nd rounder maybe we could get that USC DT or Brodney Poole.... I love draft day Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Middle Buffalo Posted April 23, 2005 Share Posted April 23, 2005 I do this trade in a heartbeat. The Bears need more than just one player. I don't know that I see McCaskey paying two first round bonuses, though. Let's hope they get a defensive wing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chisoxfn Posted April 23, 2005 Share Posted April 23, 2005 QUOTE(CWSGuy406 @ Apr 22, 2005 -> 07:02 PM) Tru, we don't need Ware. We already have Brown/Haynes/Ogunlye on the ends. Then again, I might be thinking of the wrong guy, but isn't Ware good enough to where he can adjust to playing OLB? If we do go that route -- and trade to get the #9 and #25 and an extra pick, I'd love to grab Derrick Johnson there... And then grab your WR/TE at #25. Please, someone tell me that I'm a f***ing nut for liking Johnson so damn much. Someone, please... I can't, I'd love to make that deal and see Derrick Johnson there. I"m a huge Johnson backer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jabroni Posted April 23, 2005 Share Posted April 23, 2005 Getting Rod Gardner and drafting Williamson isnt needed... Gardner and Muhsin is good as it is You wanna use the other 2 picks on need pos. If Ware is available at #9 he would be a beast, and then at 25 you take the best player there to help your team (For the Bears) which will still be a nice addition <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Muhammad and Gardner is a bad WR combo. Neither has much speed. Both are big physical jumpers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
backman Posted April 23, 2005 Share Posted April 23, 2005 How bout Campbell, he seems pretty good not saying take him with 9, but the 25th wouldn’t seem so bad. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YASNY Posted April 23, 2005 Share Posted April 23, 2005 The guy I've been hearing the Bears are interested at if they get that#25 pick is Auburn QB Jason Campbell. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jackie hayes Posted April 23, 2005 Share Posted April 23, 2005 QUOTE(Jabroni @ Apr 23, 2005 -> 05:29 AM) Muhammad and Gardner is a bad WR combo. Neither has much speed. Both are big physical jumpers. No, what we put on the field last year was "bad". Mush and Gardner would simply be 'not ideal', but still pretty damn good. I still don't see why Washington makes this deal. Talk about a team with needs. And if they're aiming at 'making a splash', to me that sounds like Braylon Edwards, who doesn't look to last to #4. Not that I'd ever question the wisdom of Dan Snyder... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.