DBAHO Posted May 2, 2005 Share Posted May 2, 2005 Little piece here from Ken Rosenthal got me thinking of that scenario; The Royals are such a mess, one scout says, "I almost think they're lost." Another adds sarcastically, "If they win 50 games, it's a great year." Two decisions, in particular, appeared shortsighted: The demotion of 1B/DH Calvin Pickering after only 27 at-bats and the promotion of RHP Ambiorix Burgos to closer in his first season above Class A. It should not have been surprising that Pickering, 28, pressed in his first legitimate major league opportunity. Burgos, 21, possesses an electric arm, but the Royals could retard his development by thrusting him into such a high-pressure role. It seems inevitable the team will trade 1B/DH Mike Sweeney, but his deficiencies at first base almost certainly will eliminate any N.L. interest. . . . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Be Good Posted May 2, 2005 Share Posted May 2, 2005 56 is my guess Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AssHatSoxFan Posted May 2, 2005 Share Posted May 2, 2005 i thought every team has 60 wins and 60 losses Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WilliamTell Posted May 2, 2005 Share Posted May 2, 2005 They'll win 50 for sure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DonkeyKongerko Posted May 2, 2005 Share Posted May 2, 2005 In 2002, the Royals won 62 games. They went 10-9 against a poor Cleveland team, and 10-9 against the 55-win Tigers. They also went 8-11 vs. the Sox and 7-2 vs. Texas. They also managed a 9-game win streak somehow. The 2005 Royals have a much worse offense than that team and play in a vastly improved division. There's a good chance they'll be right around 50 or so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rangercal Posted May 2, 2005 Share Posted May 2, 2005 QUOTE(DBAH0 @ May 2, 2005 -> 06:20 AM) Little piece here from Ken Rosenthal got me thinking of that scenario; I think they can put together a few 2 game winning streaks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanOfCorn Posted May 2, 2005 Share Posted May 2, 2005 How does Allard Baird still have a job? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted May 2, 2005 Share Posted May 2, 2005 I still get a laugh thinking about people predicting these guys to win the division in 2004. They are 3 years away at least, and that is if they keep all of these guys together. They have some great young arms though. Sisco and Burgos are going to be nasty in the 8th and 9th innings. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iWiN4PreP Posted May 2, 2005 Share Posted May 2, 2005 That is.. if they get to the 8th inning with hopes of winning lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rowand44 Posted May 2, 2005 Share Posted May 2, 2005 We have to now face KC when they're the hottest they'll get all year, 2 game winning streak. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DonkeyKongerko Posted May 5, 2005 Share Posted May 5, 2005 I've realized the answer to this question is also the answer to the question, "Will Mike Sweeney be traded this year?" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Capn12 Posted May 5, 2005 Share Posted May 5, 2005 Don't kid yourself. KC has some very talented hurlers. Problem is, when they need a big hit, you look at that lineup and see only 1 guy that can beat you...and I doubt he'll be there much longer himself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NUKE_CLEVELAND Posted May 5, 2005 Share Posted May 5, 2005 QUOTE(rangercal @ May 2, 2005 -> 12:20 PM) I think they can put together a few 2 game winning streaks. When do the D-Rays come to KC? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rowand44 Posted May 5, 2005 Share Posted May 5, 2005 QUOTE(NUKE_CLEVELAND @ May 4, 2005 -> 10:55 PM) When do the D-Rays come to KC? What about the yankees? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZoomSlowik Posted May 5, 2005 Share Posted May 5, 2005 The Royals are just god awful. They have exactly one guy that can hit, and their pitching staff is composed of guys that are either very young or not that good to start with. In a couple of years Grienke, Affeldt, Burgos, and Sisco could all be impact guys, but they have to find some guys that can actually hit. They'll still win at least 50 though, it's really hard to not win that many. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts