Balta1701 Posted May 4, 2005 Share Posted May 4, 2005 CNN.com/Sports Illustrated have a piece up of the "20 best young pitchers in baseball." # 2 is our very own Mark Buehrle Here's what they have to say about him... "Mark Buehrle, 26, White Sox Season: 3-1, 3.89, K/BB: 25-9 Career: 72-46, 3.76, K/BB: 606-249 The White Sox's underrated workhorse already has four seasons of 200-plus innings under his belt. That's pretty good for a 38th round draft pick." Their #1 pitcher is Santana, as you probably expected, but I took some joy in the fact that they ranked Buehrle higher than Zambrano or Prior. John Garland was ranked #13. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZoomSlowik Posted May 4, 2005 Share Posted May 4, 2005 Seems like the people making the list prefer results over potential. Zito is the only guy a little out of place based on results, and he's kind of been in a slide the last few years. Peavy and Harden should both probably be higher. Willis at 8 is BS, Garland is probably too high also. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maggliopipe Posted May 4, 2005 Share Posted May 4, 2005 Interesting to see Greinke is not on the list but Garland, Myers, Marquis, Bedard, Bonderman, Cliff Lee and Jeff Francis (?) are. I'd likely take Greinke over any of them (unless Jonnyboy continues this streak). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
danman31 Posted May 4, 2005 Share Posted May 4, 2005 QUOTE(maggliopipe @ May 3, 2005 -> 08:12 PM) Interesting to see Greinke is not on the list but Garland, Myers, Marquis, Bedard, Bonderman, Cliff Lee and Jeff Francis (?) are. Francis tore up the minor leagues last year and made his debut in September as a 40 man callup. He is a rookie this year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hammerhead johnson Posted May 4, 2005 Share Posted May 4, 2005 I love Mark, but there is no way he should rank higher than Sheets, Zambrano, Peavy, Beckett, and Prior. I noticed that the cut-off point is 26 years of age. Extending it to 27 would have been smart, what with Roy Oswalt, Roy Halladay, Mark Mulder, and Odalis Perez. Cliff Lee? That's pretty funny. How are you gonna put that guy ahead of people like Brad Penny, Joel Pineiro, Zack Greinke, and even some of the new jacks like Scott Kazmir, Gustavo Chacin, and Dan Haren? #14 Overall Brett Myers had a 5.50 ERA and a 1.50 WHIP last year. I don't care how home run happy Citizens Bank Park is. He had a 5.33 ERA and a 1.54 WHIP on the road. He's got a ton of potential, but he ain't no Top 15. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qwerty Posted May 4, 2005 Share Posted May 4, 2005 QUOTE(hammerhead johnson @ May 4, 2005 -> 12:43 AM) I love Mark, but there is no way he should rank higher than Sheets, Zambrano, Peavy, Beckett, and Prior. I noticed that the cut-off point is 26 years of age. Extending it to 27 would have been smart, what with Roy Oswalt, Roy Halladay, Mark Mulder, and Odalis Perez. Cliff Lee? That's pretty funny. How are you gonna put that guy ahead of people like Brad Penny, Joel Pineiro, Zack Greinke, and even some of the new jacks like Scott Kazmir, Gustavo Chacin, and Dan Haren? #14 Overall Brett Myers had a 5.50 ERA and a 1.50 WHIP last year. I don't care how home run happy Citizens Bank Park is. He had a 5.33 ERA and a 1.54 WHIP on the road. He's got a ton of potential, but he ain't no Top 15. Sheets had an era+ of over 100 zero times up until last year. Buehrle has done it every year of his career. Better career era than peavy ( who i admit is f***ing awesome to watch pitch and should be very very high on this list.) and also higher than beckett. Zambrano is not liked much by white sox fans because he is on the cubs and the fact he is crazy, but he is the best pitcher in chicago if used properly. Perez has a career 102 era+ because a 4.00 career era @ dodgers stadium is not overly impressive at all. He is also very inconsistent. You don't know what you are gonna get from him year in year out. Penny has not been overally impressive throughout his career but i think we will see him in the 3.30 era range this year ( if healthy). Pineiro also needs to stay healthy because if he does he is at the very top of the list of ''young pitchers'' Grienke not being on the list is moronic. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hammerhead johnson Posted May 4, 2005 Share Posted May 4, 2005 (edited) QUOTE(qwerty @ May 4, 2005 -> 06:04 AM) Perez has a career 102 era+ because a 4.00 career era @ dodgers stadium is not overly impressive at all. He is also very inconsistent. You don't know what you are gonna get from him year in year out. Penny has not been overally impressive throughout his career but i think we will see him in the 3.30 era range this year ( if healthy). Pineiro also needs to stay healthy because if he does he is at the very top of the list of ''young pitchers'' Grienke not being on the list is moronic. Odalis definitely sucked in 2003, but I think that he's finally started to turn the corner in terms of consistency. 2004: 196 IP 3.25 ERA 1.14 WHIP 2005: 30 IP 3.64 ERA 1.08 WHIP In 2004, he kept his ERA at 3.75 or better against every team that he went up against other than Anaheim, Montreal, and San Diego (5 starts combined). But you never know, he could get hammered this summer if he reverts back to his 2003 form. EDIT: 4.50 ERA against the Diamondbacks in 4 starts. 2004 road numbers Edited May 4, 2005 by hammerhead johnson Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Punch and Judy Garland Posted May 4, 2005 Share Posted May 4, 2005 (edited) I believe that Peavy is one of the two best pitchers in the game with Johna being the other. You can't argue against Myers unless you argue against Garland. Both were beneath their potential until great starts this year Edited May 4, 2005 by Punch and Judy Garland Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YASNY Posted May 4, 2005 Share Posted May 4, 2005 QUOTE(Punch and Judy Garland @ May 4, 2005 -> 02:05 AM) I believe that Peavy is one fot he two best pitchers in the game with Johna being ht eother. You can't argue against Myers unless you argue against Garland. Both were beneath their potential until great starts this year Peavy and Santana. That's hard to disagree with. So I won't try. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AngelasDaddy0427 Posted May 4, 2005 Share Posted May 4, 2005 QUOTE(qwerty @ May 4, 2005 -> 12:04 AM) Zambrano is not liked much by white sox fans because he is on the cubs and the fact he is crazy, but he is the best pitcher in chicago if used properly. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I know I would take Zambrano on the sox staff in a heart beat (though i'd give him some pills to chill him out first :rolly ) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Punch and Judy Garland Posted May 4, 2005 Share Posted May 4, 2005 It's weird because Zambrano, much like Wood and Prior, is clearly more talented than Buehrle but I'd take Buehrle over Zambrano because I'd know what I'm getting. I still believe int he stats that show injuries for pitchers with rapid increases in pitch count slike Carlos'., Not sure if it;s applicable a few years after the increase but I wouldn't trust his arm with Dusty's care. I do love Mark though and hope he's a White Sox pitcher for a very long time. I'd actually have no problem with signing him to a 5-6 year deal as a huge exception to managements policy. THis of course wouldn't need to be done for a few years Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AngelasDaddy0427 Posted May 4, 2005 Share Posted May 4, 2005 QUOTE(Punch and Judy Garland @ May 4, 2005 -> 01:17 AM) It's weird because Zambrano, much like Wood and Prior, is clearly more talented than Buehrle but I'd take Buehrle over Zambrano because I'd know what I'm getting. I still believe int he stats that show injuries for pitchers with rapid increases in pitch count slike Carlos'., Not sure if it;s applicable a few years after the increase but I wouldn't trust his arm with Dusty's care. I do love Mark though and hope he's a White Sox pitcher for a very long time. I'd actually have no problem with signing him to a 5-6 year deal as a huge exception to managements policy. THis of course wouldn't need to be done for a few years <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Well I would never take Zambrano over Buherle but I would love a rotation with Zambrano in it... Buherle Garcia Zambrano Garland Hernandez *Drools* Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cerbaho-WG Posted May 4, 2005 Share Posted May 4, 2005 Harden at 11? Um. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WilliamTell Posted May 4, 2005 Share Posted May 4, 2005 As of today I believe that Mark is tied with Zito for the most wins on that list. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hammerhead johnson Posted May 4, 2005 Share Posted May 4, 2005 QUOTE(WilliamTell @ May 4, 2005 -> 03:19 PM) As of today I believe that Mark is tied with Zito for the most wins on that list. They're both at the cut-off age of 26, so naturally, they're gonna have more wins that dudes in their early twenties. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hammerhead johnson Posted May 4, 2005 Share Posted May 4, 2005 QUOTE(Punch and Judy Garland @ May 4, 2005 -> 07:05 AM) You can't argue against Myers unless you argue against Garland. Both were beneath their potential until great starts this year I hear that, but Myers performed at a level waaay below his potential last year with the second worst ERA in the major leagues among guys who threw at least 150 innings. You can begin to understand why I'd object to his presence in a Top 15 list. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.