fathom Posted May 28, 2005 Share Posted May 28, 2005 Instead of Willie s***ball, it should be Willie "4-3" Harris. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ReinsdorfSucks Posted May 28, 2005 Share Posted May 28, 2005 the worst thing about all this is that the sox are getting shut down by these no name pitchers. it's one thing if you go down good pitching. it's another to embarrass yourselves Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jabroni Posted May 28, 2005 Share Posted May 28, 2005 Instead of Willie s***ball, it should be Willie "4-3" Harris. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I prefer Willie "Soft grounder to the right side" Harris. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WHarris1 Posted May 28, 2005 Share Posted May 28, 2005 Willie=good fielder Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsideirish71 Posted May 28, 2005 Share Posted May 28, 2005 Nice lineup tonight. Uribe and his under 200 BA hitting second. The only thing that would make this lineup better is if we had Timo in tonight. Hey the kid didnt have it tonight. Needs to keep the ball down more. But if our pitching fails with our terrible offense this is what we should all expect to see. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jackie hayes Posted May 28, 2005 Share Posted May 28, 2005 Willie's one of the handful of players w/ a hit in this game, and he's the problem? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ReinsdorfSucks Posted May 28, 2005 Share Posted May 28, 2005 IT'S SHINGO TIME... a.k.a. mop up time Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CSF Posted May 28, 2005 Share Posted May 28, 2005 QUOTE(ReinsdorfSucks @ May 27, 2005 -> 08:55 PM) the worst thing about all this is that the sox are getting shut down by these no name pitchers. it's one thing if you go down good pitching. it's another to embarrass yourselves Does it matter that this guy is 4-2, and has had a 1.69 ERA in his last 3 starts? I mean, that is bad pitching, right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest JimH Posted May 28, 2005 Share Posted May 28, 2005 Does it matter that this guy is 4-2, and has had a 1.69 ERA in his last 3 starts? I mean, that is bad pitching, right? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Stop, you're confusing things with logic and facts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fathom Posted May 28, 2005 Share Posted May 28, 2005 QUOTE(jackie hayes @ May 28, 2005 -> 01:57 AM) Willie's one of the handful of players w/ a hit in this game, and he's the problem? You mean the bunt hit that should have been an error on the pitcher? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qwerty Posted May 28, 2005 Share Posted May 28, 2005 QUOTE(ChiSoxFan @ May 27, 2005 -> 08:57 PM) Does it matter that this guy is 4-2, and has had a 1.69 ERA in his last 3 starts? That seems hard to do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest JimH Posted May 28, 2005 Share Posted May 28, 2005 Soriano needs to hit the dirt here, won't happen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CSF Posted May 28, 2005 Share Posted May 28, 2005 QUOTE(JimH @ May 27, 2005 -> 08:58 PM) Stop, you're confusing things with logic and facts. What the hell was I thinking? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ReinsdorfSucks Posted May 28, 2005 Share Posted May 28, 2005 Does it matter that this guy is 4-2, and has had a 1.69 ERA in his last 3 starts? I mean, that is bad pitching, right? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> 4-2 in three starts huh? WOW. pretty amazing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WHarris1 Posted May 28, 2005 Share Posted May 28, 2005 QUOTE(fathom @ May 27, 2005 -> 08:59 PM) You mean the bunt hit that should have been an error on the pitcher? Umm well he got on base? Yikes now we are b****ing about guys getting on base. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WHarris1 Posted May 28, 2005 Share Posted May 28, 2005 (edited) QUOTE(ReinsdorfSucks @ May 27, 2005 -> 08:59 PM) 4-2 in three starts huh? WOW. pretty amazing ROFLMFAO 1.69 ERA does that register in your brain? ERA>>>>W/L Edited May 28, 2005 by WHarris1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rowand44 Posted May 28, 2005 Share Posted May 28, 2005 QUOTE(ReinsdorfSucks @ May 27, 2005 -> 07:59 PM) 4-2 in three starts huh? WOW. pretty amazing No, his overall record is 4 and 2 and he has a 1.69 era in his last 3 starts. The sox offense is definitely funking right now but Young's a good pitcher. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fathom Posted May 28, 2005 Share Posted May 28, 2005 QUOTE(WHarris1 @ May 28, 2005 -> 02:00 AM) Umm well he got on base? Yikes now we are b****ing about guys getting on base. No..no...no. I definitely wasn't complaining about Willie getting on base. I was just saying that he's as guilty as anyone for our s***ty offense tonight. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CSF Posted May 28, 2005 Share Posted May 28, 2005 QUOTE(ReinsdorfSucks @ May 27, 2005 -> 08:59 PM) 4-2 in three starts huh? WOW. pretty amazing Well, seeing how that would defy the law of numbers (or averages, physics, whatnot), ya might want to re-read the post. :rolly Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qwerty Posted May 28, 2005 Share Posted May 28, 2005 (edited) QUOTE(Rowand44 @ May 27, 2005 -> 09:00 PM) No, his overall record is 4 and 2 and he has a 1.69 era in his last 3 starts. The sox offense is definitely funking right now but Young's a good pitcher. Me Edited May 28, 2005 by qwerty Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WHarris1 Posted May 28, 2005 Share Posted May 28, 2005 QUOTE(fathom @ May 27, 2005 -> 09:01 PM) he's as guilty as anyone for our s***ty offense tonight. Not as the guys who haven't gotten on base? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jabroni Posted May 28, 2005 Share Posted May 28, 2005 Are those brown streaks on Walker's pants? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ReinsdorfSucks Posted May 28, 2005 Share Posted May 28, 2005 Well, seeing how that would defy the law of numbers (or averages, physics, whatnot), ya might want to re-read the post. :rolly <{POST_SNAPBACK}> you're the one that typed it s***head. learn to put a sentence together. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rowand44 Posted May 28, 2005 Share Posted May 28, 2005 QUOTE(ReinsdorfSucks @ May 27, 2005 -> 08:02 PM) you're the one that typed it s***head. learn to put a sentence together. Ahh, we're always so friendly around here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jackie hayes Posted May 28, 2005 Share Posted May 28, 2005 QUOTE(fathom @ May 28, 2005 -> 01:59 AM) You mean the bunt hit that should have been an error on the pitcher? Dunno, didn't see it, I came late and just read "bunt hit". But w/ everyone hitting like s***, with a lineup full of .230 hitters, I think it's interesting that the scapegoat is a guy who's hitting close to .280 and at least got on base, in a way that most people here would cheer loudly if it were some other players. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts