Flash Tizzle Posted June 13, 2005 Share Posted June 13, 2005 Jurors attempting to remain anonymous, via Fox News. Sorry jurors. You'll have to explain yourselves after this debacle. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyyle23 Posted June 13, 2005 Share Posted June 13, 2005 QUOTE(Flash Tizzle @ Jun 13, 2005 -> 04:31 PM) Court TV says Jackson portrayed no significant emotion. Just stood there, as if to wonder how the hell he's a free man. I suppose now we'll find out there was a OJSimpson glove moment where the prosecutors screwed themselves and moronic jurors used it as reasonable doubt. Im telling you, the glove moment was when the mother testified. Try and find some of the CNN archived stories about her testimony, I knew as soon as I read them that he was going free. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soxfest Posted June 13, 2005 Share Posted June 13, 2005 Do anything you want in California if you got money and famous you will simply walk. Not to be guilty on count 2 is a joke he admitted to giving kids alcohol. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Texsox Posted June 13, 2005 Share Posted June 13, 2005 QUOTE(FlaSoxxJim @ Jun 13, 2005 -> 04:30 PM) Pigeons = domesticated/semi-domesticated rock doves, Columbia livia. [/bio geek commentary] I started to research that. I'm wondering what she was going to do with them if he was going to prison. Tie a file to their wing and teach them to find Michael? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Queen Prawn Posted June 13, 2005 Share Posted June 13, 2005 Just out of curiosity, how many of you were jurors before? If you were, how many were on molestation cases? I was on one about a month or two ago. It's not fun and no matter how you decide you agonize over it - I still do. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted June 13, 2005 Share Posted June 13, 2005 QUOTE(Soxfest @ Jun 13, 2005 -> 02:35 PM) Do anything you want in California if you got money and famous you will simply walk. Not to be guilty on count 2 is a joke he admitted to giving kids alcohol. I believe the "giving alcohol to children" part wasn't charged separately, but as part of a giving alcohol to children to enable molestation charge. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LowerCaseRepublican Posted June 13, 2005 Share Posted June 13, 2005 QUOTE(Soxfest @ Jun 13, 2005 -> 03:35 PM) Do anything you want in California if you got money and famous you will simply walk. Not to be guilty on count 2 is a joke he admitted to giving kids alcohol. Even if they found him guilty of the misdemeanors it would just be a fine and then done. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jabroni Posted June 13, 2005 Share Posted June 13, 2005 MJ himself admitted to sleeping with kids and giving them alcohol. How does he get off on those counts? Amazing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steff Posted June 13, 2005 Author Share Posted June 13, 2005 QUOTE(Queen Prawn @ Jun 13, 2005 -> 04:36 PM) Just out of curiosity, how many of you were jurors before? If you were, how many were on molestation cases? I was on one about a month or two ago. It's not fun and no matter how you decide you agonize over it - I still do. Mer, never. And I never could because of what happened to my girlfriend. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Texsox Posted June 13, 2005 Share Posted June 13, 2005 Now put the dumb ass parents that drove victims to Neverland Ranch on trial. ANy parent after his that allows their child to anytime, supervised, unsupervised, it doesn't matter, with Jackson deserves to be locked up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soxfest Posted June 13, 2005 Share Posted June 13, 2005 QUOTE(LowerCaseRepublican @ Jun 13, 2005 -> 04:37 PM) Even if they found him guilty of the misdemeanors it would just be a fine and then done. I realize that but he WILL do this again Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jabroni Posted June 13, 2005 Share Posted June 13, 2005 (edited) The jury was glum and didn't look at Jackson because they were probably f***ing embarrassed by their own verdict. Edited June 13, 2005 by Jabroni Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Queen Prawn Posted June 13, 2005 Share Posted June 13, 2005 QUOTE(Texsox @ Jun 13, 2005 -> 04:39 PM) Now put the dumb ass parents that drove victims to Neverland Ranch on trial. ANy parent after his that allows their child to anytime, supervised, unsupervised, it doesn't matter, with Jackson deserves to be locked up. Exactly right. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flash Tizzle Posted June 13, 2005 Share Posted June 13, 2005 QUOTE(Jabroni @ Jun 13, 2005 -> 03:37 PM) MJ himself admitted to sleeping with kids and giving them alcohol. How does he get off on those counts? Amazing. A litigous mother with a troubling past is apparently more compeling than a former pop star who's admitted to sleeping with little boys and handing out "jesus juice." How the hell was Peterson every guilty in this state? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DukeNukeEm Posted June 13, 2005 Share Posted June 13, 2005 Biggest Bulls*** Ever LETS RIOT Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steff Posted June 13, 2005 Author Share Posted June 13, 2005 QUOTE(Flash Tizzle @ Jun 13, 2005 -> 04:42 PM) A litigous mother with a troubling past is apparently more compeling than a former pop star who's admitted to sleeping with little boys and handing out "jesus juice." How the hell was Peterson every guilty in this state? And given the DEATH PENALTY with LESS evidence!!! :headshake :banghead Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted June 13, 2005 Share Posted June 13, 2005 QUOTE(Texsox @ Jun 13, 2005 -> 02:39 PM) Now put the dumb ass parents that drove victims to Neverland Ranch on trial. ANy parent after his that allows their child to anytime, supervised, unsupervised, it doesn't matter, with Jackson deserves to be locked up. They're doing it for the money. Very simple. If you let your kid sleep over there...maybe you can cash in on part of the Beatles song catalog. Don't think it isn't part of the reasoning. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soxfest Posted June 13, 2005 Share Posted June 13, 2005 Oj, MJ, Robert Blake............not guilty..........rich famous........and in California they call it justice Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KipWellsFan Posted June 13, 2005 Share Posted June 13, 2005 If not guilty America is soft on celebrities. Shyte I forgot this case was in a liberal state. correction: If not guilty CALIFORNIA is soft on celebrities. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steff Posted June 13, 2005 Author Share Posted June 13, 2005 QUOTE(Soxfest @ Jun 13, 2005 -> 04:50 PM) Oj, MJ, Robert Blake............not guilty..........rich famous........and in California they call it justice They would have gotten Blake on conspiracy.. he didn't pull the trigger. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soxfest Posted June 13, 2005 Share Posted June 13, 2005 QUOTE(Steff @ Jun 13, 2005 -> 04:53 PM) They would have gotten Blake on conspiracy.. he didn't pull the trigger. Would of ,could of still not guilty verdict Cali-style Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Queen Prawn Posted June 13, 2005 Share Posted June 13, 2005 QUOTE(Soxfest @ Jun 13, 2005 -> 04:54 PM) Would of ,could of still not guilty verdict Cali-style From what I understand about the Blake trial, the prosecution did an absolutely horrible job. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steff Posted June 13, 2005 Author Share Posted June 13, 2005 QUOTE(Queen Prawn @ Jun 13, 2005 -> 04:55 PM) From what I understand about the Blake trial, the prosecution did an absolutely horrible job. They put a guy on trial that had absolutely positively zero forensic evidence on his person. The gun didn't match the casings and there was no gp residue. And at the range she was shot the killer would have been covered with blood.. Kind of like the Peterson case but reverse. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BurlyMan56 Posted June 13, 2005 Share Posted June 13, 2005 Wow...that verdict was a THRILLER.... :banghead Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanOfCorn Posted June 13, 2005 Share Posted June 13, 2005 On with the Civil Case. Say goodbye to Neverland Ranch, Michael. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.