Heads22 Posted June 15, 2005 Share Posted June 15, 2005 Just reported on the Weather Channel. Freaky and strange. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heads22 Posted June 15, 2005 Author Share Posted June 15, 2005 http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?.../n203047D74.DTL Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DBAHO Posted June 15, 2005 Share Posted June 15, 2005 Ok glad I'm gonna be at LAX next week and not this week. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jackie hayes Posted June 15, 2005 Share Posted June 15, 2005 (edited) 7.0 earthquake, 80 miles off the Calif coast. Edit: Some sources say 7.4. Whatever, a big quake. Edited June 15, 2005 by jackie hayes Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heads22 Posted June 15, 2005 Author Share Posted June 15, 2005 If there is one it is expected to hit SF at 9:23 Pacific, 11:23 central. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DBAHO Posted June 15, 2005 Share Posted June 15, 2005 QUOTE(Heads22 @ Jun 15, 2005 -> 01:57 PM) If there is one it is expected to hit SF at 9:23 Pacific, 11:23 central. Yikes, I know some of my Dad's workmates were in San Francisco over the weekend, not sure if they are still there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whitesoxin' Posted June 15, 2005 Share Posted June 15, 2005 Uh oh. How big was the earthquake that caused Decembers Tsunami? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heads22 Posted June 15, 2005 Author Share Posted June 15, 2005 9, wasn't it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DBAHO Posted June 15, 2005 Share Posted June 15, 2005 QUOTE(Heads22 @ Jun 15, 2005 -> 02:04 PM) 9, wasn't it? IIRC yeah it was. Let's hope it's nothing like that again. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jackie hayes Posted June 15, 2005 Share Posted June 15, 2005 QUOTE(whitesoxin' @ Jun 15, 2005 -> 04:02 AM) Uh oh. How big was the earthquake that caused Decembers Tsunami? Much, much bigger. 9.0-9.3, according to Wikipedia. Linkage. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kev211 Posted June 15, 2005 Share Posted June 15, 2005 Wow thats scary I hope one dosent hit! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KipWellsFan Posted June 15, 2005 Share Posted June 15, 2005 here's the warning NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE SAN FRANCISCO CA 830 PM PDT TUE JUN 14 2005 CAZ005-006-009-074-075-150600- SONOMA AND MARIN COUNTIES-SAN FRANCISCO- COASTAL MONTEREY COUNTY- SANTA CRUZ COUNTY-SAN MATEO COUNTY- 830 PM PDT TUE JUN 14 2005 ...A TSUNAMI WARNING IS IN EFFECT FOR THE COASTAL AREAS FROM THE CALIFORNIA-MEXICO BORDER TO THE NORTH TIP OF VANCOUVER ISLAND BRITISH COLUMBIA INCLUSIVE... EARTHQUAKE DATA... PRELIMINARY MAGNITUDE 7.4 LOCATION... 41.3 NORTH 125.7 WEST... OR 90 MILES NW OF EUREKA, CA AND 300 MILES NW OF SAN FRANCISCO CA AT 751 PM PDT. IT IS NOT KNOWN...REPEAT NOT KNOWN...IF A TSUNAMI EXISTS...BUT A TSUNAMI MAY HAVE BEEN GENERATED. THEREFORE PERSONS IN LOW LYING COASTAL AREAS SHOULD BE alert TO INSTRUCTIONS FROM THEIR LOCAL EMERGENCY OFFICIALS. PERSONS ON THE BEACH SHOULD MOVE TO HIGHER GROUND IF IN A WARNED AREA. TSUNAMIS MAY BE A SERIES OF WAVES WHICH COULD BE DANGEROUS FOR SEVERAL HOURS AFTER THE INITIAL WAVE ARRIVAL. THIS TSUNAMI WARNING INCLUDES THE ENTIRE CALIFORNIA COAST. ESTIMATED TIME OF ARRIVAL IN THE SAN FRANCISCO AREA IS APPROXIMATELY 923 PM PDT. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LosMediasBlancas Posted June 15, 2005 Share Posted June 15, 2005 Keep in mind there was a good size quake near the Chile-Peru border on Monday. It's along the same western coast in South America. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heads22 Posted June 15, 2005 Author Share Posted June 15, 2005 http://www.prh.noaa.gov/ptwc/wmsg Looks like they're calling it off. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DBAHO Posted June 15, 2005 Share Posted June 15, 2005 QUOTE(Heads22 @ Jun 15, 2005 -> 02:15 PM) http://www.prh.noaa.gov/ptwc/wmsg Looks like they're calling it off. That's good to hear. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LosMediasBlancas Posted June 15, 2005 Share Posted June 15, 2005 That same area had a minor tsunami in 1964 which killed 11 people. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heads22 Posted June 15, 2005 Author Share Posted June 15, 2005 Well it looks like the bulletin was before the warning. Looks like we may find out shortly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heads22 Posted June 15, 2005 Author Share Posted June 15, 2005 Well it looks like the quake happened at 752 local, the bulletin say no tsunami was at 759 and the warning occured at 830. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heads22 Posted June 15, 2005 Author Share Posted June 15, 2005 Of course, another explanation could be Bartolo Colon falling off a boat... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FlaSoxxJim Posted June 15, 2005 Share Posted June 15, 2005 QUOTE(Heads22 @ Jun 14, 2005 -> 11:23 PM) Of course, another explanation could be Bartolo Colon falling off a boat... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DBAHO Posted June 15, 2005 Share Posted June 15, 2005 QUOTE(Heads22 @ Jun 15, 2005 -> 02:23 PM) Of course, another explanation could be Bartolo Colon falling off a boat... Maybe they ran out of Krispy Kreme Donuts and he decided to go fishing instead...... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kev211 Posted June 15, 2005 Share Posted June 15, 2005 QUOTE(Heads22 @ Jun 14, 2005 -> 11:23 PM) Of course, another explanation could be Bartolo Colon falling off a boat... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heads22 Posted June 15, 2005 Author Share Posted June 15, 2005 Warning cancelled, apparently, for real this time. http://www.khnl.com/Global/story.asp?S=3475519 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted June 15, 2005 Share Posted June 15, 2005 Wow, the earth is really going nuts. SD earthquake at 5.6, this earthquake at 7, and the Chilean quake at over 7. The earth must look like a tuning fork right now. Jim maybe you know this, could this be secondary effects of the Indonsesian quake, basically shaking the earth so hard, that some of the other faults of the world start to give way? And also do you think we could see some more volcanic activity that could be the result of, or a contributing cause to this quake activity? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FlaSoxxJim Posted June 15, 2005 Share Posted June 15, 2005 Current expert opinion is that this is the earth's way of railing against the reuniting of the Spice Girls and Tony Orlando and Dawn. I actually don't have much insight on if and how all the events are related - other than the above 'Gaia hates bad music hypothesis.' Even for those in the field there are tremendous gaps in the knowledge because events are usually only being recorded from great distances away. The upside of all this activity, including the December tragedy, is that the lack of information is getting noted and efforts are being stepped up to get seafloor Global Ocean Observatory System (GOOS) networks in place. These will monitor tectonic/seismic activity simultaneously along all plate margins and allow synthesis of informartion at the global scale of resolution. Big dollar projects - and to think it only took ~ 200K deaths to get things rolling. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.