sayitaintso Posted June 21, 2005 Share Posted June 21, 2005 QUOTE(ScottPodRulez22 @ Jun 21, 2005 -> 02:25 PM) gmail if you already have an account and have plenty of invitations to make adresses for yourself. It would still be way to time counsuming. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve9347 Posted June 21, 2005 Share Posted June 21, 2005 I'd say the White Sox are running away with it. HAHA. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChWRoCk2 Posted June 21, 2005 Share Posted June 21, 2005 QUOTE(sayitaintso @ Jun 21, 2005 -> 03:26 PM) It would still be way to time counsuming. and the allcity vote isnt Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sayitaintso Posted June 21, 2005 Share Posted June 21, 2005 QUOTE(Steve9347 @ Jun 21, 2005 -> 02:27 PM) I'd say the White Sox are running away with it. HAHA. Pretty much. Look in the All City Team Thread with 41 pages in it. You will see why were dominating it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buehrle>Wood Posted June 21, 2005 Share Posted June 21, 2005 http://www.soxtalk.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=35436 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sayitaintso Posted June 21, 2005 Share Posted June 21, 2005 QUOTE(chi-guy2 @ Jun 21, 2005 -> 02:28 PM) and the allcity vote isnt Not really, it takes like 5 minutes to do 1000 votes the rigged way. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dam8610 Posted June 21, 2005 Share Posted June 21, 2005 You'd need 40,000 accounts to even make a dent in the all-star voting. The all-city team is far easier to rig. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kev211 Posted June 21, 2005 Share Posted June 21, 2005 QUOTE(Steve9347 @ Jun 21, 2005 -> 03:27 PM) I'd say the White Sox are running away with it. HAHA. There is a 41 page thread about this. Read before you post. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kev211 Posted June 21, 2005 Share Posted June 21, 2005 QUOTE(chi-guy2 @ Jun 21, 2005 -> 03:28 PM) and the allcity vote isnt No it only takes 5 minutes to do. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sayitaintso Posted June 21, 2005 Share Posted June 21, 2005 QUOTE(ScottPodRulez22 @ Jun 21, 2005 -> 02:31 PM) There is a 41 page thread about this. Read before you post. The person is new, you got to cut them some slack for a little while. Not if it is a recouring habit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sayitaintso Posted June 21, 2005 Share Posted June 21, 2005 QUOTE(Dam8610 @ Jun 21, 2005 -> 02:30 PM) You'd need 40,000 accounts to even make a dent in the all-star voting. The all-city team is far easier to rig. Exactly! And that's why i joined in the rigging too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kev211 Posted June 21, 2005 Share Posted June 21, 2005 QUOTE(sayitaintso @ Jun 21, 2005 -> 03:33 PM) The person is new, you got to cut them some slack for a little while. Not if it is a recouring habit. It is the most active thread on here for the past week. I could see if it had fell back a few pages. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kev211 Posted June 21, 2005 Share Posted June 21, 2005 QUOTE(Dam8610 @ Jun 21, 2005 -> 03:30 PM) You'd need 40,000 accounts to even make a dent in the all-star voting And like 3 days of doing nothing but voting. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve9347 Posted June 21, 2005 Share Posted June 21, 2005 yeah, maybe i wanted to start a new thread because no one is going to surf to the end of an 8,000 post thread. take it easy webking! :finger Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sayitaintso Posted June 21, 2005 Share Posted June 21, 2005 QUOTE(ScottPodRulez22 @ Jun 21, 2005 -> 02:34 PM) It is the most active thread on here for the past week. I could see if it had fell back a few pages. Mehh. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sayitaintso Posted June 21, 2005 Share Posted June 21, 2005 (edited) QUOTE(Steve9347 @ Jun 21, 2005 -> 02:36 PM) yeah, maybe i wanted to start a new thread because no one is going to surf to the end of an 8,000 post thread. take it easy webking! Some people will though thats the point. Edited June 21, 2005 by sayitaintso Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sayitaintso Posted June 21, 2005 Share Posted June 21, 2005 QUOTE(ScottPodRulez22 @ Jun 21, 2005 -> 02:35 PM) And like 3 days of doing nothing but voting. I'd give it at least 5 days. It would take forever just to make a difference in the All-Star votes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kev211 Posted June 21, 2005 Share Posted June 21, 2005 QUOTE(Steve9347 @ Jun 21, 2005 -> 03:36 PM) yeah, maybe i wanted to start a new thread because no one is going to surf to the end of an 8,000 post thread. take it easy webking! :finger Try 600 and there all one liners too. No one posted a big paragraph in there. I have to admit alot of times i skip big paragraphs out of sheer laziness. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jerseysox Posted June 21, 2005 Share Posted June 21, 2005 QUOTE(sayitaintso @ Jun 21, 2005 -> 03:37 PM) People will though thats the point. no, they won't. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sayitaintso Posted June 21, 2005 Share Posted June 21, 2005 (edited) QUOTE(jerseysox @ Jun 21, 2005 -> 02:39 PM) no, they won't. Not read it all, but go to the end of the topic and then read what's there. How else to threads make it that long. Edited June 21, 2005 by sayitaintso Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve9347 Posted June 21, 2005 Share Posted June 21, 2005 well, either way, sox are running away with it... i'll start a new topic anytime i want. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sayitaintso Posted June 21, 2005 Share Posted June 21, 2005 (edited) QUOTE(Steve9347 @ Jun 21, 2005 -> 02:43 PM) well, either way, sox are running away with it... i'll start a new topic anytime i want. :headshake ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ I love merged topics. Edited June 21, 2005 by sayitaintso Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SleepyWhiteSox Posted June 21, 2005 Share Posted June 21, 2005 QUOTE(Steve9347 @ Jun 21, 2005 -> 03:43 PM) well, either way, sox are running away with it... i'll start a new topic anytime i want. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kev211 Posted June 21, 2005 Share Posted June 21, 2005 QUOTE(Steve9347 @ Jun 21, 2005 -> 03:43 PM) well, either way, sox are running away with it... i'll start a new topic anytime i want. Your not going to last with that attitude. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sayitaintso Posted June 21, 2005 Share Posted June 21, 2005 (edited) Coming from someone who almost got kicked out today(thankfully a warning), you should probaly tone it down a notch or so. Edited June 21, 2005 by sayitaintso Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.