wdson01 Posted June 28, 2005 Share Posted June 28, 2005 QUOTE(mrzo2733 @ Jun 26, 2005 -> 08:26 PM) I agree. I would give up whatever it took to get Oswalt, Clemens, or a for sure healthy Schmidt. Ditto for Lidge. Lilly doesn't make much sense to me. We need another pitcher and whoever it is needs to be dominating. If we got any of those guys I would really like our chances. why should be trade away our already thinning farm system for a fouth ace??? we need solid 4th or 5th starter which gives us the capability to put either contreras or el duque into the bullpen and prevents us from needing to bring up mccarthy anytime el duque needs a rest. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted June 28, 2005 Share Posted June 28, 2005 You know...I'm betting we get 1 good start from McCarthy or 1 good start from El Duque or 1 good start from Contreras and these "we need a starting pitcher" threads will suddenly disappear. Every pitcher (not named Mark Buehrle) goes through ups and downs. I think the up swings on our current guys are worth the down swings. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Middle Buffalo Posted June 28, 2005 Share Posted June 28, 2005 At this point, El Duque is the #4 and Contreras is basically the #5. All we need is for Contreras to eat up some innings for the rest of the season. Hernandez needs to get his arm right for the playoffs. If he has a good September, the Sox will give him playoff starts. Otherwise, it's MB, Garcia and Garland. Not bad. It would be nice to have Duque's experience, though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3E8 Posted June 28, 2005 Share Posted June 28, 2005 QUOTE(Stephen @ Jun 27, 2005 -> 01:24 AM) I definately would feel better if we picked up another ace. You make it seem like they grow on trees. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Antonio Osuna Posted June 28, 2005 Share Posted June 28, 2005 why should be trade away our already thinning farm system for a fouth ace??? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Because this is our only chance for decades to win the World Series. You only start out 50-22 once in a lifetime. I'll be angry if Uncle Jerry blows it. I don't think too many Sox fans will disagree. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Antonio Osuna Posted June 28, 2005 Share Posted June 28, 2005 we need solid 4th or 5th starter which gives us the capability to put either contreras or el duque into the bullpen and prevents us from needing to bring up mccarthy anytime el duque needs a rest. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Garland and one of conde/duque will provide all the 4/5 we need if we acquire another ace, and both the loser of the 5 spot and McCarthy will be available in the pen. For the playoffs, we are going to need to win games when the back end of the rotation is pitching. If we have a real ace in the #3 hole, we can do a lot of damage. Oh, and for those of you (like myself) who violently reply to any post containing the word playoffs with "It's just June, we haven't won anything!", another Ace will be oh-so-helpful in keeping the rising Twinkies down. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VAfan Posted June 28, 2005 Author Share Posted June 28, 2005 I wonder what we would do with Contreras and/or El Duque if we did acquire a 4th ace in a trade. Neither fit in the bullpen. I can't imagine us just eating their contracts. Any chance any team would take Contreras and the same $3 million the Yankees gave us as part of the trade? This wouldn't solve the #5 hole, but it might keep the balance sheet in better shape for next year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsideirish71 Posted June 28, 2005 Share Posted June 28, 2005 Boston most likely will be in the playoffs. And do you really want the count going up against a team that he has s*** the bed pretty much every time he has faced them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nitetrain8601 Posted June 28, 2005 Share Posted June 28, 2005 QUOTE(Antonio Osuna @ Jun 27, 2005 -> 10:55 PM) Because this is our only chance for decades to win the World Series. You only start out 50-22 once in a lifetime. I'll be angry if Uncle Jerry blows it. I don't think too many Sox fans will disagree. And you do realize that 4th ace will only start 2 max games in the playoffs? Another ace isn't needed. It's a luxury. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nitetrain8601 Posted June 28, 2005 Share Posted June 28, 2005 QUOTE(Antonio Osuna @ Jun 27, 2005 -> 10:58 PM) Garland and one of conde/duque will provide all the 4/5 we need if we acquire another ace, and both the loser of the 5 spot and McCarthy will be available in the pen. For the playoffs, we are going to need to win games when the back end of the rotation is pitching. If we have a real ace in the #3 hole, we can do a lot of damage. Oh, and for those of you (like myself) who violently reply to any post containing the word playoffs with "It's just June, we haven't won anything!", another Ace will be oh-so-helpful in keeping the rising Twinkies down. Again, they would start 2 games max in the playoffs. So the 4th and 5th starters will be available in the pen regardless. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoxFan1 Posted June 28, 2005 Share Posted June 28, 2005 QUOTE(qwerty @ Jun 27, 2005 -> 02:40 AM) Exactly. But we will hear about it until the deadline, alot. A lot.....2 words. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsideirish71 Posted June 28, 2005 Share Posted June 28, 2005 QUOTE(nitetrain8601 @ Jun 28, 2005 -> 01:08 PM) And you do realize that 4th ace will only start 2 max games in the playoffs? Another ace isn't needed. It's a luxury. Well we have a possible 4th starter in Conteras who s***s himself everytime he sniffs Fenway. or We have another guy who had a 5.40 ERA in the playoffs last year. He was hitting 88-90 on the gun. This year he is hitting 84-85 and has been on the DL now twice. I keep forgetting where starts in the playoffs are throw aways because they only happen a few times. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZoomSlowik Posted June 28, 2005 Share Posted June 28, 2005 We don't need to trade for Jason Schmidt or Roger Clemens. You're basically going to use 3 guys through most of the playoffs, with one, maybe two starts for the 4th guy. For a 4th starter, Contreras works. Considering he would probably be facing the other team's 4th starter like Miller/Wakefield, Wang, or whatever scrub Baltimore or Texas throw out there, I wouldn't worrry that much. LA is the only team with a credible 4th starter, but it'd probably be Bird (doing better than he should right now) unless Escobar gets his s*** together, which doesn't seem likely. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsideirish71 Posted June 28, 2005 Share Posted June 28, 2005 QUOTE(ZoomSlowik @ Jun 28, 2005 -> 01:54 PM) We don't need to trade for Jason Schmidt or Roger Clemens. You're basically going to use 3 guys through most of the playoffs, with one, maybe two starts for the 4th guy. For a 4th starter, Contreras works. Considering he would probably be facing the other team's 4th starter like Miller/Wakefield, Wang, or whatever scrub Baltimore or Texas throw out there, I wouldn't worrry that much. LA is the only team with a credible 4th starter, but it'd probably be Bird (doing better than he should right now) unless Escobar gets his s*** together, which doesn't seem likely. Oontreras against the Redsox? Good lord. He s***s himself everytime you mention Fenway. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nitetrain8601 Posted June 28, 2005 Share Posted June 28, 2005 QUOTE(southsideirish71 @ Jun 28, 2005 -> 02:06 PM) Oontreras against the Redsox? Good lord. He s***s himself everytime you mention Fenway. He's a different pitcher now. Despite 2 really bad starts, he's still a damn good 4th starter who matches up with almost anyone else's #4. I think too many people on this board have gotten spoiled by what they got from Buehrle, Garcia, and Garland thus far that they think a whole pitching staff should pitch the same. That's not the case and is very unrealistic. I'm not saying Contreras won't get rocked, but it's not safe to assume he will either. Ask the Yankees if they would trade back for Contreras, I guarentee you they would say yeah. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZoomSlowik Posted June 28, 2005 Share Posted June 28, 2005 QUOTE(southsideirish71 @ Jun 28, 2005 -> 03:06 PM) Oontreras against the Redsox? Good lord. He s***s himself everytime you mention Fenway. Assuming we even face the Red Sox, he'd probably pitch game 2, meaning it'd be at the Cell. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VAfan Posted June 28, 2005 Author Share Posted June 28, 2005 QUOTE(southsideirish71 @ Jun 28, 2005 -> 07:38 PM) Well we have a possible 4th starter in Conteras who s***s himself everytime he sniffs Fenway. or We have another guy who had a 5.40 ERA in the playoffs last year. He was hitting 88-90 on the gun. This year he is hitting 84-85 and has been on the DL now twice. I keep forgetting where starts in the playoffs are throw aways because they only happen a few times. The playoffs are not throwaways, but you have to consider the marginal value of mortgaging the farm for pitchers - like AJ Burnett or Jason Schmidt - who we cannot possibly fit in our salary structure next year unless some team will take Contreras or El Duque off our hands. Would you give AJ Burnett the money we would need to sign Paul Konerko and Frank Thomas next year? The guy has only twice pitched 150 innings or more. And Jason Schmidt is a power pitcher coming off an injury that sapped his velocity. I want to win the WS as much as anyone, but I also want us to win the AL Central more often than once every 5 years. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VAfan Posted June 28, 2005 Author Share Posted June 28, 2005 (edited) Of course the solution to our 4th playoff starter problem is: El Contreduque Any chance we could just split every 4th game between them?? The trouble would be figuring out which one to have start the game! Edited June 28, 2005 by VAfan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kalapse Posted June 28, 2005 Share Posted June 28, 2005 QUOTE(VAfan @ Jun 28, 2005 -> 03:49 PM) Of course the solution to our 4th playoff starter problem is: El Contreduque Any chance we could just split every 4th game between them?? The trouble would be figuring out which one to have start the game! You could have Contreras go 4 or 5 and then have Duke piggyback him. Usually Contreras is pretty solid through the first 6 and gets hit hard in the 7th. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nitetrain8601 Posted June 28, 2005 Share Posted June 28, 2005 QUOTE(VAfan @ Jun 28, 2005 -> 02:49 PM) Of course the solution to our 4th playoff starter problem is: El Contreduque Any chance we could just split every 4th game between them?? The trouble would be figuring out which one to have start the game! I was actually thinking that earlier in the year if they needed to pitch a playoff game(as in start). Both go 4 and then you have Hermy in for the save. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.