Nokona Posted June 30, 2005 Share Posted June 30, 2005 Well I'm gonna guess that he'll pitch brilliantly until the 7th when Pods will misplay a ball over his head and blow the Win for BMac. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiSox_Sonix Posted June 30, 2005 Share Posted June 30, 2005 i pretty much guessed it...off by .1 IP, 1 SO and 1 BB Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Punch and Judy Garland Posted June 30, 2005 Share Posted June 30, 2005 He was good. But, you do KNOW that I-Rod flyout was long gone at home right? Still, you pitch to the park and he used it pretty effectively on the whole. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NUKE_CLEVELAND Posted June 30, 2005 Share Posted June 30, 2005 Nice outing after all. 3 runs in 6 innings +. I'll gladly take that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoxFan1 Posted June 30, 2005 Share Posted June 30, 2005 QUOTE(SoxFan1 @ Jun 29, 2005 -> 06:44 PM) 6 2/3 IP, 8 hits, 5 K, 4 BB, 3 ER I was close as hell. Off by 1/3 IP, 2 hits, 4 BB. I got the 5 K and 3 ER right. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jabroni Posted June 30, 2005 Share Posted June 30, 2005 I can't wait to see the line predictions if McCarthy pitches at the Cell in his next start. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jerseysox Posted June 30, 2005 Share Posted June 30, 2005 QUOTE(jerseysox @ Jun 29, 2005 -> 05:04 PM) i EXPECT six innings of three-run ball Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kalapse Posted June 30, 2005 Share Posted June 30, 2005 QUOTE(SoxFan1 @ Jun 29, 2005 -> 10:25 PM) I was close as hell. Off by 1/3 IP, 2 hits, 4 BB. I got the 5 K and 3 ER right. That's not close. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoxFan1 Posted June 30, 2005 Share Posted June 30, 2005 QUOTE(Kalapse @ Jun 29, 2005 -> 11:28 PM) That's not close. Just the 4BB. I a glad he didn't walk anybody though. Take away walks and I pretty much got it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
danman31 Posted June 30, 2005 Share Posted June 30, 2005 BMac had control of his curveball. When he has that he doesn't need a 3rd pitch. When his curveball is off, it's hard for him to succeed without that change. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Capn12 Posted June 30, 2005 Share Posted June 30, 2005 He still gave up some hammered shots though. Still with that being said, it was a quality start, which was all we could ask for from that slot in the rotation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jabroni Posted June 30, 2005 Share Posted June 30, 2005 He still gave up some hammered shots though. Still with that being said, it was a quality start, which was all we could ask for from that slot in the rotation. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Yes, it was a QS. But I still fear him pitching at the Cell. He probably would have given up 4 homers if he was pitching at the Cell tonight. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
danman31 Posted June 30, 2005 Share Posted June 30, 2005 Yeah, but he settled down until the 7th. Heck, he already surpassed my expectations after seeing the Texas game. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YASNY Posted June 30, 2005 Share Posted June 30, 2005 QUOTE(Jabroni @ Jun 29, 2005 -> 11:16 PM) Yes, it was a QS. But I still fear him pitching at the Cell. He probably would have given up 4 homers if he was pitching at the Cell tonight. But he wasn't pitching at the Cell. If he was, he might have pitched those guys differently. He did what he did tonight. Why belittle his accomplishments with meaningless speculation? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jabroni Posted June 30, 2005 Share Posted June 30, 2005 But he wasn't pitching at the Cell. If he was, he might have pitched those guys differently. He did what he did tonight. Why belittle his accomplishments with meaningless speculation? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Because he is prone to giving up deep fly balls. He did it at Wrigley, he did it at Texas, and he did it at Detroit. Those deep flies tonight are homers at many ballparks and definately at the Cell. He will have to pitch his home games at the Cell, right? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YASNY Posted June 30, 2005 Share Posted June 30, 2005 QUOTE(Jabroni @ Jun 30, 2005 -> 02:20 AM) Because he is prone to giving up deep fly balls. He did it at Wrigley, he did it at Texas, and he did it at Detroit. Those deep flies tonight are homers at many ballparks and definately at the Cell. He will have to pitch his home games at the Cell, right? Damn, you're a stubborn cuss. :headshake Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jabroni Posted June 30, 2005 Share Posted June 30, 2005 Damn, you're a stubborn cuss. :headshake <{POST_SNAPBACK}> He also did it at Charlotte. Maybe that's just the way he pitches a la Eric Milton -- a flyball pitcher. That won't fly well pitching at the Cell. No pun intended. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.