Controlled Chaos Posted July 1, 2005 Share Posted July 1, 2005 (edited) He grabbed girl's arm -- now he's a sex offender July 1, 2005 BY STEVE PATTERSON Staff Reporter Fitzroy Barnaby said he had to swerve to avoid hitting the 14-year-old Des Plaines girl who walked in front of his car. She said he yelled, "Come here, little girl," before getting out of his car and grabbing her by the arm. He said he simply lectured her. She said she broke free and ran, fearful of what he'd do next. In a Thursday ruling, the Appellate Court of Illinois said the 28-year-old Evanston man must register as a sex offender. While acknowledging it might be "unfair for [barnaby] to suffer the stigmatization of being labeled a sex offender when his crime was not sexually motivated," the court said his actions are the type that are "often a precursor" to a child being abducted or molested. Though Barnaby was acquitted of attempted kidnapping and child abduction charges stemming from the November 2002 incident, he was convicted of unlawful restraint of a minor -- which is a sex offense. 'Most stupid ruling' Now, he will have to tell local police where he lives and won't be able to live near a park or school. "This is the most stupid ruling the appellate court has rendered in years," said Barnaby's Chicago attorney, Frederick Cohn. "If you see a 15-year-old beating up your 8-year-old and you grab that kid's hand and are found guilty of unlawful restraint, do you now have to register as a sex offender?" But Cook County state's attorney spokesman Tom Stanton said Barnaby should have to register "because of the proclivity of offenders who restrain children to also commit sex acts or other crimes against them." In the criminal case against him, Cook County Judge Patrick Morse said that "it's more likely than not" Barnaby planned only "to chastise the girl" when he grabbed her, but "I can't read his mind." "I don't really see the purpose of registration in this case. I really don't," Morse said. "But I feel that I am constrained by the statute." Recognizing the stigma that comes with being labeled as a sex offender, the appellate court said "it is [barnaby's] actions which have caused him to be stigmatized, not the courts." Edited July 1, 2005 by Controlled Chaos Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Queen Prawn Posted July 1, 2005 Share Posted July 1, 2005 I heard about this on the radio. That is total and utter bulls***. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steff Posted July 1, 2005 Share Posted July 1, 2005 Unreal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LosMediasBlancas Posted July 1, 2005 Share Posted July 1, 2005 Actually, I read that even just 'mooning' someone could get in the same trouble. It's considered 'exposing' yourself to someone. If you get someone who wants to screw you and take it as far as it can go, you could end up on a sex offender list. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Texsox Posted July 1, 2005 Share Posted July 1, 2005 :headshake What happened to common sense? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LosMediasBlancas Posted July 1, 2005 Share Posted July 1, 2005 QUOTE(Texsox @ Jul 1, 2005 -> 03:15 PM) :headshake What happened to common sense? It's the least common of all senses. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Controlled Chaos Posted July 1, 2005 Author Share Posted July 1, 2005 It's just ridiulous. Maybe the parents should have punished their daughter for running in front of a car and almost killing hereself. He went from being responsible enough to slam on his breaks and not kill a girl that ran in front of his car...to being a sex offender. Utterly ridiculous. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YASNY Posted July 1, 2005 Share Posted July 1, 2005 There are many cases where the label of "sex offender" is not justified. People are so quick to support this s***, without giving thought to how it can totally f*** up someone's life. There is a legitimate need for sex offender registration, but damn, this is sick. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LosMediasBlancas Posted July 1, 2005 Share Posted July 1, 2005 what is unlawful restraint and in what situation is unlawful restraint of a minor by itself a sex offense? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steff Posted July 1, 2005 Share Posted July 1, 2005 QUOTE(LosMediasBlancas @ Jul 1, 2005 -> 11:05 AM) what is unlawful restraint and in what situation is unlawful restraint of a minor by itself a sex offense? It's when you restrain a minor at any time against their will. The charge is a good one - when applicable... but that it's attached to sex offense crimes and not by itself is where the problem lies. It should be totally separate.. but since in order to sexually offend a minor you have to restrain them they were attached I believe in the late '90's when those 2 twins in Chicago were abducted and the sex laws against minors were updated. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Beast Posted July 1, 2005 Share Posted July 1, 2005 Complete, and absolute bulls***. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.