Mr. Showtime Posted July 3, 2005 Share Posted July 3, 2005 Half way home Pretty good read. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WHarris1 Posted July 3, 2005 Share Posted July 3, 2005 • Carl Everett does not get credit for what he means to the White Sox, not only as their only legitimate left-handed threat against right-handed relievers, but for the edge and energy he brings to that team. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Showtime Posted July 3, 2005 Author Share Posted July 3, 2005 QUOTE(WHarris1 @ Jul 2, 2005 -> 09:26 PM) Jurassic is the man for sure. However, I said it in the chat, and I'll say it here. I guess Gammons hasn't heard what Carl thinks of him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rangercal Posted July 3, 2005 Share Posted July 3, 2005 • How unpredictable are relievers? Take the Baseball Prospectus Reliever Expected Runs chart which rates the performances, and the top 20 relievers in baseball, in order, are Cliff Politte, Chris Hammond, Jesse Crain, Chad Cordero, Huston Street, Roberto Hernandez, Al Reyes, Pete Walker, Todd Jones, B.J. Ryan, Danys Baez, John Grabow, Matt Miller, Scott Eyre, Hector Carrasco, Mike Timlin, Rudy Seanez, Rafael Betancourt, Jay Witasick and Lance Cormier. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NUKE_CLEVELAND Posted July 3, 2005 Share Posted July 3, 2005 Nice to see Politte get some props. Hes been money all season long. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mplssoxfan Posted July 3, 2005 Share Posted July 3, 2005 Here's a little caution for you Schmidt lovers (and I am one). Two teams, the White Sox and Orioles, sent scouts to Arizona on Tuesday specifically to see Schmidt; all the other scouts were on regular coverage. The Giants say they have to be "overwhelmed" to trade him, especially with the fact that they've crept back into the race and might get Bonds back in a month. "He was just OK," says one scout who was there. "He isn't close to what he once was. He touched 93, but it wasn't explosive. His changeup is good, but he doesn't throw his breaking ball any more. He's good, but he's not dominant." I still want him, though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChWRoCk2 Posted July 3, 2005 Share Posted July 3, 2005 whats with all the schmidt talk, giants wont trade him, hes to good to give away and that division could fall apart at any minute, they are gonna keep schmidt Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Milkman delivers Posted July 3, 2005 Share Posted July 3, 2005 QUOTE(Mr. Showtime @ Jul 2, 2005 -> 09:29 PM) Jurassic is the man for sure. However, I said it in the chat, and I'll say it here. I guess Gammons hasn't heard what Carl thinks of him. What did Everett say about Gammons? If it was anything about being an old, red-sox-loving bastard that is ignorant in the sport of baseball, then he was right. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wedge Posted July 3, 2005 Share Posted July 3, 2005 QUOTE(Mplssoxfan @ Jul 2, 2005 -> 09:35 PM) Here's a little caution for you Schmidt lovers (and I am one). Two teams, the White Sox and Orioles, sent scouts to Arizona on Tuesday specifically to see Schmidt; all the other scouts were on regular coverage. The Giants say they have to be "overwhelmed" to trade him, especially with the fact that they've crept back into the race and might get Bonds back in a month. "He was just OK," says one scout who was there. "He isn't close to what he once was. He touched 93, but it wasn't explosive. His changeup is good, but he doesn't throw his breaking ball any more. He's good, but he's not dominant." I still want him, though. Why? Everything thus far says trading him is a mistake. In the gigantor trade thread, I think most of us agreed that we should take the scout's word for his value. Apparently, it's pretty low. Schmidt is a shell of himself. He won't help us. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WilliamTell Posted July 3, 2005 Share Posted July 3, 2005 I hope it was our scout that was talking about Schmidt. I don't feel like we need him for what they're going to want. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rowand44 Posted July 3, 2005 Share Posted July 3, 2005 QUOTE(Milkman delivers @ Jul 2, 2005 -> 09:45 PM) What did Everett say about Gammons? If it was anything about being an old, red-sox-loving bastard that is ignorant in the sport of baseball, then he was right. He was making a crack about Gammons being gay. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GoodAsGould Posted July 3, 2005 Share Posted July 3, 2005 QUOTE(Rowand44 @ Jul 3, 2005 -> 06:58 AM) He was making a crack about Gammons being gay. How could he do that if he doesnt believe in gay people Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rowand44 Posted July 3, 2005 Share Posted July 3, 2005 QUOTE(SoxFan101 @ Jul 3, 2005 -> 01:11 AM) How could he do that if he doesnt believe in gay people No, no, no. You've got it all mixed up he doesn't believe in dinasours, he just believes homosexuality is wrong. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jordan4life_2007 Posted July 3, 2005 Share Posted July 3, 2005 The part about Schmidt is a definite turn off. Anybody been keeping up with his most recent outings? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
witesoxfan Posted July 3, 2005 Share Posted July 3, 2005 QUOTE(Jordan4life_2005 @ Jul 3, 2005 -> 02:46 AM) The part about Schmidt is a definite turn off. Anybody been keeping up with his most recent outings? 6/11 - Cleveland - 5 IP, 6 H, 6 R(6 ER), 3 BB, 7 K 6/17 - @Detroit - 8 IP, 7 H, 0 R, 1 BB, 5 K 6/22 - Arizona - 8 IP, 5 H, 0 R, 2 BB, 10 K 6/28 - @Arizona - 6 IP, 9 H, 3 R(3 ER), 3 BB, 6 K Definately can't like his WHIP of 2 in his last start. I don't think trading for him would be wise at all, unless the package was understandably cheap. The risk/reward is far, far too great for me atleast to consider making the deal for what you'd have to give up. The reward is huge...he returns to dominance of 03, or atleast returns to being very good, ala 02 and 04, and it would be a crying shame if we didn't win the series(because with a 1-4 of Buehrle-Garcia-Schmidt-Garland in any order, you have no reason to lose any type of series). The risk is could be far greater though...giving up 2 top prospects for what could a disaster...Schmidt being worse than Duque, along with the Sox being stuck with an unbelievably bad contract while hurting in the future for young players. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rowand44 Posted July 3, 2005 Share Posted July 3, 2005 QUOTE(witesoxfan @ Jul 3, 2005 -> 03:09 AM) 6/11 - Cleveland - 5 IP, 6 H, 6 R(6 ER), 3 BB, 7 K 6/17 - @Detroit - 8 IP, 7 H, 0 R, 1 BB, 5 K 6/22 - Arizona - 8 IP, 5 H, 0 R, 2 BB, 10 K 6/28 - @Arizona - 6 IP, 9 H, 3 R(3 ER), 3 BB, 6 K Definately can't like his WHIP of 2 in his last start. I don't think trading for him would be wise at all, unless the package was understandably cheap. The risk/reward is far, far too great for me atleast to consider making the deal for what you'd have to give up. The reward is huge...he returns to dominance of 03, or atleast returns to being very good, ala 02 and 04, and it would be a crying shame if we didn't win the series(because with a 1-4 of Buehrle-Garcia-Schmidt-Garland in any order, you have no reason to lose any type of series). The risk is could be far greater though...giving up 2 top prospects for what could a disaster...Schmidt being worse than Duque, along with the Sox being stuck with an unbelievably bad contract while hurting in the future for young players. The contract isn't that big of a deal, he has a team option after this year with a 3 or 3.5 mill buyout. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wedge Posted July 3, 2005 Share Posted July 3, 2005 QUOTE(Rowand44 @ Jul 3, 2005 -> 03:12 AM) The contract isn't that big of a deal, he has a team option after this year with a 3 or 3.5 mill buyout. at that point we've given up two top prospects or more for half a season of a pitcher that's potentially worse than the one we've got. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YASNY Posted July 3, 2005 Share Posted July 3, 2005 QUOTE(Wedge @ Jul 3, 2005 -> 08:20 AM) at that point we've given up two top prospects or more for half a season of a pitcher that's potentially worse than the one we've got. ... Or ... potentially the difference between a world series win or an early playoff exit. Potential can go both ways. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C_LEE45 Posted July 3, 2005 Share Posted July 3, 2005 I dont like the Schmidt trade because i dont want to give up our farm for a guy past his prime,but i will say this the cuban connection MUST GO iam tired of seeing walks walks and a blast so if iam KW i would go after AJ Burnett and make a run at Billiy Wagner and somehow trade Contreras and marte and some prospects. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
That funky motion Posted July 3, 2005 Share Posted July 3, 2005 QUOTE(Rowand44 @ Jul 3, 2005 -> 01:20 AM) No, no, no. You've got it all mixed up he doesn't believe in dinasours, he just believes homosexuality is wrong. What about a gay dinosour? I believe that your gay but I dont believe in you! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YASNY Posted July 3, 2005 Share Posted July 3, 2005 QUOTE(That funky motion @ Jul 3, 2005 -> 08:57 AM) What about a gay dinosour? I believe that your gay but I dont believe in you! That would be Barney. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CWSOX45 Posted July 3, 2005 Share Posted July 3, 2005 Sorry folks, but if we have the chance to snag Jason Schmidt, we need to do it. That bumps Contreras into the pen for the post-season. Having more than 5 reliable starting pitchers in the play-offs can do wonders for a ball club. Look at the Red Sox last year, they had Derek Lowe and Bronson Arroyo coming out of the pen until later in the ALCS! Getting Schmidt would only bolster our rotation even more, a change of scenery may also be what Schmidt needs to get him back on track. I love Brandon McCarthy but there is no way you can rely on him to be solid in the post-season, let alone in consecutive starts. We need to get Jason Schmidt. CWSOX45 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nitetrain8601 Posted July 3, 2005 Share Posted July 3, 2005 QUOTE(CWSOX45 @ Jul 3, 2005 -> 09:40 AM) Sorry folks, but if we have the chance to snag Jason Schmidt, we need to do it. That bumps Contreras into the pen for the post-season. Having more than 5 reliable starting pitchers in the play-offs can do wonders for a ball club. Look at the Red Sox last year, they had Derek Lowe and Bronson Arroyo coming out of the pen until later in the ALCS! Getting Schmidt would only bolster our rotation even more, a change of scenery may also be what Schmidt needs to get him back on track. I love Brandon McCarthy but there is no way you can rely on him to be solid in the post-season, let alone in consecutive starts. We need to get Jason Schmidt. CWSOX45 And just like Arroyo and Lowe, Count and Duque will be in the bullpen. Only reason why Lowe even got a shot was because of Schilling's injury. Else he would've been in the bullpen the whole time. Schmidt in his current state isn't going to help us more than Count or El Duque. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Milkman delivers Posted July 3, 2005 Share Posted July 3, 2005 QUOTE(C_LEE45 @ Jul 3, 2005 -> 08:53 AM) I dont like the Schmidt trade because i dont want to give up our farm for a guy past his prime,but i will say this the cuban connection MUST GO iam tired of seeing walks walks and a blast so if iam KW i would go after AJ Burnett and make a run at Billiy Wagner and somehow trade Contreras and marte and some prospects. I remember people saying that Chavez won't get back to his norm, but he's just about there now. Just saying that some players are proven talents and you can't judge them on a small sample size. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kalapse Posted July 3, 2005 Share Posted July 3, 2005 QUOTE(Milkman delivers @ Jul 3, 2005 -> 11:48 AM) I remember people saying that Chavez won't get back to his norm, but he's just about there now. Just saying that some players are proven talents and you can't judge them on a small sample size. Chavez is 28 years old and had 1 1/3 bad years anyone who said that he wouldn't get back to form is f***ing retarded. The difference between Schmidt and Chavez is first of all age. Chavez is 5 years younger than Schmidt and has never been injured, he was just underperforming. Schmidt on the other hand is a 32 year old pitcher with arm problems. The guy doesn't have the same velocity that he once had and because of that he is no longer the dominating pitcher he once was. However what the Giants would want for him is a package equivalent to if he was still a Cy Young calebor pitcher. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.