Princess Dye Posted July 18, 2005 Share Posted July 18, 2005 trade to ariz likely Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest JimH Posted July 18, 2005 Share Posted July 18, 2005 Thread title misleading? If this is just speculation it's been covered in the other forum. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
retro1983hat Posted July 18, 2005 Share Posted July 18, 2005 QUOTE(JimH @ Jul 18, 2005 -> 12:24 PM) Thread title misleading? If this is just speculation it's been covered in the other forum. I agree. I clicked on the topic thinking it was done. Give me a He Gone! When he actually Gone! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YASNY Posted July 18, 2005 Share Posted July 18, 2005 Title changed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Princess Dye Posted July 18, 2005 Author Share Posted July 18, 2005 score 670 reports that it is happening. so i thought i would let you all know. i suppose we've seen that sort of thing before, when it falls thru. but i'm into taking huge posting risks, Dude. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Princess Dye Posted July 18, 2005 Author Share Posted July 18, 2005 thread title changed? tyrant. when i'm proved right, i'll demand 8 apologies. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YASNY Posted July 18, 2005 Share Posted July 18, 2005 QUOTE(Princess Dye @ Jul 18, 2005 -> 12:29 PM) thread title changed? tyrant. when i'm proved right, i'll demand 8 apologies. If it's official, then it was correct. If it isn't officially a done deal yet, then it's misleading. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rangercal Posted July 18, 2005 Share Posted July 18, 2005 QUOTE(Princess Dye @ Jul 18, 2005 -> 12:28 PM) score 670 reports that it is happening. so i thought i would let you all know. i suppose we've seen that sort of thing before, when it falls thru. but i'm into taking huge posting risks, Dude. Thanks for informing us! I can't belive anyone has not posted any rumors on shingo yet! Congrats on being the 1st to post this breaking news! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted July 18, 2005 Share Posted July 18, 2005 QUOTE(Princess Dye @ Jul 18, 2005 -> 12:29 PM) thread title changed? tyrant. when i'm proved right, i'll demand 8 apologies. I hope you are joking for your sake. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Princess Dye Posted July 18, 2005 Author Share Posted July 18, 2005 the key, however: will my thread be credited as the inaugural Shingo is gone thread? this is what Matters. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Princess Dye Posted July 18, 2005 Author Share Posted July 18, 2005 QUOTE(southsider2k5 @ Jul 18, 2005 -> 11:33 AM) I hope you are joking for your sake. you are hideous! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted July 18, 2005 Share Posted July 18, 2005 QUOTE(Princess Dye @ Jul 18, 2005 -> 10:34 AM) the key, however: will my thread be credited as the inaugural Shingo is gone thread? this is what Matters. So if I post a thread saying the White Sox have won the world series, would I get credit in October as the inaugural victory thread? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Princess Dye Posted July 18, 2005 Author Share Posted July 18, 2005 QUOTE(Balta1701 @ Jul 18, 2005 -> 11:36 AM) So if I post a thread saying the White Sox have won the world series, would I get credit in October as the inaugural victory thread? finally someone is with me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YASNY Posted July 18, 2005 Share Posted July 18, 2005 (edited) QUOTE(Princess Dye @ Jul 18, 2005 -> 12:34 PM) the key, however: will my thread be credited as the inaugural Shingo is gone thread? this is what Matters. Since this is what matters, Princess, I would like to inform you that there is an ongoing thread about this very thing in The Inside Beat subforum. Edited July 18, 2005 by YASNY Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted July 18, 2005 Share Posted July 18, 2005 QUOTE(Princess Dye @ Jul 18, 2005 -> 10:38 AM) finally someone is with me. Um...that was supposed to be an argument against your point. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AWhiteSoxinNJ Posted July 18, 2005 Share Posted July 18, 2005 (edited) There are 2-3 Shingo threads in the "Inside Beat" sub forum...you may want to try to look there first. Edited July 18, 2005 by AWhiteSoxinNJ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted July 18, 2005 Share Posted July 18, 2005 No need to litter PHT with this craptacular thread. Off to the trade forum you go Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Princess Dye Posted July 18, 2005 Author Share Posted July 18, 2005 (edited) Balta: work on detecting typed sarcasm better. truth time: i dont care about having the inaugural thread. what i will argue for though is the legitimacy of my post. the Score 670 reported that the trade is happening. Balta, your reasoning does not exactly hold up. are you saying we cant post that a move is happening until the exact moment it's official? one, we have no exact way of knowing when that is. two, we post on these things when they are reported. Shingo-to-Zona has been reported. if you want more accuracy, how bout you let me know when the i's are dotted, etc. case in point: should one never post about any of these agreed-upon NBA contracts until July 22, when FA season officially begins? Edited July 18, 2005 by Princess Dye Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyyle23 Posted July 18, 2005 Share Posted July 18, 2005 Lets make it simple Princess. Dont post a trade as being done until it is so. Until then, it is a RUMOR, and thus belongs in the White Sox RUMOR threads. There was no sarcasm there, so dont worry about detecting it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Princess Dye Posted July 18, 2005 Author Share Posted July 18, 2005 so there is no importance to the fact that the Score says this trade is happening? lets face it: if i wasnt here entertaining myself with a faux-smarmy attitude, you would have said, 'thanks for the info' .... and you would have been informed, instead of pure evil. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YASNY Posted July 18, 2005 Share Posted July 18, 2005 QUOTE(Princess Dye @ Jul 18, 2005 -> 12:52 PM) so there is no importance to the fact that the Score says this trade is happening? lets face it: if i wasnt here entertaining myself with a faux-smarmy attitude, you would have said, 'thanks for the info' .... and you would have been informed, instead of pure evil. No one is being "evil" toward you. The thread title was misleading because the deal is not done yet. It's good to post reports about a possible deal, and this one may just happen. But, until Shingo's gone, then a thread title saying "shingo gone" is not accurate. I changed the title to eliminate confusion for all the other posters on Soxtalk, not to disrespect you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyyle23 Posted July 18, 2005 Share Posted July 18, 2005 QUOTE(Princess Dye @ Jul 18, 2005 -> 12:52 PM) so there is no importance to the fact that the Score says this trade is happening? No, there is no importance at all. If we posted all of the links that said a trade is happening, there would be no end to it. If we reported every radio station that said a trade is happenign, there would be no end to it. Reporters and Columnists throw as much s*** on the wall as they can to see what sticks. You just have to wait until a trade is made to say that it is done. Remember when Boston reported that the A-Rod deal was done and the only thing that was holding it up is the players association deciding if they could re-work A-Rods deal? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Princess Dye Posted July 18, 2005 Author Share Posted July 18, 2005 would a thread reading "670 reports shingo is gone" be more palatable? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3E8 Posted July 18, 2005 Share Posted July 18, 2005 QUOTE(Princess Dye @ Jul 18, 2005 -> 12:57 PM) would a thread reading "670 reports shingo is gone" be more palatable? Did they mention for whom? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted July 18, 2005 Share Posted July 18, 2005 The only thing I see happening soon is this thread being gone... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.