VAfan Posted July 25, 2005 Share Posted July 25, 2005 The Burnett speculation thread seems to be filled with 99% speculation still, but let's assume for a moment we're getting AJ and Lowell soon for the cost of BMac and Marte. What should the Sox do then? 1. Lowell v. Crede. I don't buy the theory that you keep both on the team so that Lowell can replace Konerko next year. Lowell is a 3B. If he hits to his career averages, he is clearly a better 3B than Crede. Here's Lowell's average year: 5.72 162 593 80 162 41 0 24 98 58 89 3 1 .273 .340 .466 .806 Here's Crede's: 2.86 162 553 70 141 29 1 23 81 33 89 1 2 .255 .304 .435 .739 Lowell is 31, while Crede is 27, so the trends should move together, but if the Marlins are picking up 1/3 of Lowell's contract over the next 2-1/2 years, he should be a fine bridge to Fields. That means if we're taking on Lowell, then KW must already have another trade in mind involving Joe Crede. The problem is, who would he help? Cleveland, Minnesota, Seattle, the Nats, and Philadelphia. Only the last team is a possible trade partner. 2. Whither Contreras? With Burnett on the team, are we really going to pay Jose Contreras close to $8 million to become a long reliever? Do we trust his wildness and inability to prevent steals enough to use him as an alternative closer? Must we keep him around to protect against El Duque going down again? Does this depend on re-signing Burnett? I think the answer is to trade Contreras to a contender that needs a starting pitcher. Again, the logical choice would be Philadelphia. 3. Will Philly accept Contreras, Crede, and Vizcaino for Billy Wagner? This would be the logical repercussion of a Sox trade for Burnett and Lowell. To try to add Billy Wagner in a huge push to win it all this year. Philly might go for it if they get 3 major league players in the deal. Indeed, they might be crazy not to go for it. The result would be that we would have surrendered BMac to get: Burnett for Contreras Wagner for Marte and Vizcaino Lowell for Crede We could then bring up Bajenaru for the last spot in the pen. 4. Will those additions be enough? I would consider one other move. Trying to pry Omar Vizquel from SF for Juan Uribe and prospects. Of course, all of this would be too good to be true, especially if JR spent the money to re-sign both Burnett and Wagner for the next couple of years. A possible lineup that is solid 1-9: Pods LF Iguchi 2B Everett DH Konerko 1B Dye RF Pierzynski C Rowand CF Lowell 3B Vizquel SS Bench: Ozuna, Harris (for speed), Gload, Widger, Perez. A possible rotation: Buehrle Garcia Garland Burnett El Duque Bullpen: Wagner, Politte, Cotts, Hermanson, Jenks, Bajenaru If you add a 90% Frank Thomas in mid-September through the postseason, this team could match up with anyone. With Lowell/Vizquel instead of Crede/Uribe we would have changed the left side of the infield, but we would have veteran presence and solid defense. Plus WS experience and a lot fewer outs. It is this last point that sells me. Without Thomas our lineup would have no superstars. But is also would have no weak links. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ozzie Montana Posted July 25, 2005 Share Posted July 25, 2005 QUOTE(VAfan @ Jul 25, 2005 -> 05:50 PM) A possible lineup that is solid 1-9: Pods LF Iguchi 2B Everett DH Konerko 1B Dye RF Pierzynski C Rowand CF Lowell 3B Vizquel SS Bench: Ozuna, Harris (for speed), Gload, Widger, Perez. A possible rotation: Buehrle Garcia Garland Burnett El Duque Bullpen: Wagner, Politte, Cotts, Hermanson, Jenks, Bajenaru If you add a 90% Frank Thomas in mid-September through the postseason, this team could match up with anyone. With Lowell/Vizquel instead of Crede/Uribe we would have changed the left side of the infield, but we would have veteran presence and solid defense. Plus WS experience and a lot fewer outs. It is this last point that sells me. Without Thomas our lineup would have no superstars. But is also would have no weak links. That would be one hell of a lineup and pitching Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daa84 Posted July 25, 2005 Share Posted July 25, 2005 QUOTE(VAfan @ Jul 25, 2005 -> 04:50 PM) The Burnett speculation thread seems to be filled with 99% speculation still, but let's assume for a moment we're getting AJ and Lowell soon for the cost of BMac and Marte. What should the Sox do then? 1. Lowell v. Crede. I don't buy the theory that you keep both on the team so that Lowell can replace Konerko next year. Lowell is a 3B. If he hits to his career averages, he is clearly a better 3B than Crede. Here's Lowell's average year: 5.72 162 593 80 162 41 0 24 98 58 89 3 1 .273 .340 .466 .806 Here's Crede's: 2.86 162 553 70 141 29 1 23 81 33 89 1 2 .255 .304 .435 .739 Lowell is 31, while Crede is 27, so the trends should move together, but if the Marlins are picking up 1/3 of Lowell's contract over the next 2-1/2 years, he should be a fine bridge to Fields. That means if we're taking on Lowell, then KW must already have another trade in mind involving Joe Crede. The problem is, who would he help? Cleveland, Minnesota, Seattle, the Nats, and Philadelphia. Only the last team is a possible trade partner. 2. Whither Contreras? With Burnett on the team, are we really going to pay Jose Contreras close to $8 million to become a long reliever? Do we trust his wildness and inability to prevent steals enough to use him as an alternative closer? Must we keep him around to protect against El Duque going down again? Does this depend on re-signing Burnett? I think the answer is to trade Contreras to a contender that needs a starting pitcher. Again, the logical choice would be Philadelphia. 3. Will Philly accept Contreras, Crede, and Vizcaino for Billy Wagner? This would be the logical repercussion of a Sox trade for Burnett and Lowell. To try to add Billy Wagner in a huge push to win it all this year. Philly might go for it if they get 3 major league players in the deal. Indeed, they might be crazy not to go for it. The result would be that we would have surrendered BMac to get: Burnett for Contreras Wagner for Marte and Vizcaino Lowell for Crede We could then bring up Bajenaru for the last spot in the pen. 4. Will those additions be enough? I would consider one other move. Trying to pry Omar Vizquel from SF for Juan Uribe and prospects. Of course, all of this would be too good to be true, especially if JR spent the money to re-sign both Burnett and Wagner for the next couple of years. A possible lineup that is solid 1-9: Pods LF Iguchi 2B Everett DH Konerko 1B Dye RF Pierzynski C Rowand CF Lowell 3B Vizquel SS Bench: Ozuna, Harris (for speed), Gload, Widger, Perez. A possible rotation: Buehrle Garcia Garland Burnett El Duque Bullpen: Wagner, Politte, Cotts, Hermanson, Jenks, Bajenaru If you add a 90% Frank Thomas in mid-September through the postseason, this team could match up with anyone. With Lowell/Vizquel instead of Crede/Uribe we would have changed the left side of the infield, but we would have veteran presence and solid defense. Plus WS experience and a lot fewer outs. It is this last point that sells me. Without Thomas our lineup would have no superstars. But is also would have no weak links. next time you give stats, how bout letting everyone know what they actually mean instead of just giving us numbers Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ptatc Posted July 26, 2005 Share Posted July 26, 2005 I think the idea behind adding lowell is for a RH DH and guy off the bench in case Thomas can't go anymore. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VAfan Posted July 26, 2005 Author Share Posted July 26, 2005 QUOTE(daa84 @ Jul 25, 2005 -> 11:00 PM) next time you give stats, how bout letting everyone know what they actually mean instead of just giving us numbers You ought to be able to read that without guidance. All the stat lines are the same. In this case the first number is the number of years, but everything else is normal. As for the comment about making Lowell as a RH DH, I think this would be stupid. Everett is actually hitting much better from the right side this year. If Lowell is part of any deal, we need to trade him or Crede to the Phillies as part of a package for Billy Wagner. But all of this appears like a total long shot. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DBAHO Posted July 26, 2005 Share Posted July 26, 2005 Since Philly's in the race, can't see them dealing Wagner, especially since Urbina has struggled mightily at Citizens. I think Contreras could be used in a trade with Arizona however for one of their 1B guys like Chad Tracy, but the Sox would have to throw in a prospect or 2. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.