Jump to content

Griffey Deal never happened


ARow33

Recommended Posts

By Hal McCoy

 

Dayton Daily News

 

CINCINNATI | Ken Griffey Jr. was not traded. Period. Paragraph. End of story.

 

A report in USA Today said that Griffey was traded to the Chicago White Sox on Saturday, but that Cincinnati Reds CEO Carl Lindner squashed the deal.

 

The report was denied Wednesday by Reds General Manager Dan O'Brien, Griffey, Brian Goldberg (Griffey's Cincinnati-based agent) and White Sox officials.

 

"My reaction is short and sweet," said O'Brien. "Throughout July we had no conversations with Griffey or his agent about his 10-and-5 status, and that says it all. We were consistent in indicating we wanted to keep our outfield intact, and that's where it stands."

 

Griffey said he hadn't heard word one about a trade.

 

"I heard the White Sox were interested in me, and that's a very good team," said Griffey. "But ... spring training in Tucson?"

 

For the Reds to trade Griffey anywhere, they need his approval, and Griffey was genuinely surprised when asked if he heard he was traded to the White Sox.

 

"I hadn't heard that," he said. "I hadn't heard about any kind of trade. But I did think it odd that the front office told Kent Mercker, David Weathers and Adam Dunn they wouldn't be traded, but nobody said anything to me. And nobody asked me or my agent anything about going to any other team."

 

Griffey has given the Reds a list of, "Three or four teams," to which he would accept a trade and the White Sox are not on that list.

 

Griffey's agent, Goldberg, was as surprised as Griffey by the report.

 

"Not anything to it," he said. "Conversations I had with the Reds recently revealed that nothing was up as far as trades other than a couple of inquiries. They told me he was going to remain with the Reds.

 

"And they never came to us to ask whether Junior would accept a trade," Goldberg added.

 

Much was made of the fact Griffey wasn't in Sunday's lineup, the day of the trade deadline, "But they told me Friday I wasn't going to play Sunday and I told all my friends and relatives so they wouldn't think I was traded," he said.

 

Dunn honored

 

Adam Dunn was named National League Player of the Month for July after hitting 11 homers and driving in 31 runs.

 

"Can I have your watch?" Griffey asked Dunn, referring to the gold watch award he receives.

 

"You can have anything I have because I'm a great teammate," Dunn said.

 

His pitchers certainly love him.

 

"It is something special, getting rewarded this way," said Dunn, who struggled mightily in May, picked it up in June and turned it on in July. "It was probably a bunch of little things I did differently, nothing major. I just made better contact. And I'm going to get better."

 

His manager, Jerry Narron, agrees, especially his batting averages. His top average was .266 last year and he is hitting .252 this year. But because of his walks, his on-base average always is high.

 

"I know his average is going to get better," Narron said. "It is a matter of putting the ball in play more. I was amazed how many times last year he took called third strikes.

 

"He is at the point in his career where you get better, you level off or you go backward, but he continues to get better," Narron added. "I've told him, 'Compete against yourself to see how good you can be.' "

 

Edwin's education

 

After making three errors, striking out twice and grounding into a double play Tuesday, Edwin Encarnacion was not so much worried about being back in the lineup as he was being back in Class AAA Louisville.

 

But Narron had him in the lineup — after a chat.

 

"I talked to him about the first year (Hall of Famer) Wade Boggs came to the big leagues and that he wasn't as good a fielder as Edwin is now," Narron said. "I told him how Boggs came to the park at home every day before batting practice and took extra ground balls and made himself good enough to win a couple of Gold Gloves. I told him I'd like to see him do that."

 

Encarnacion is willing and said, "I'll do that. I'll work hard every day to get better. That's part of my job. I've never had a day like that, ever.

 

"But (Narron) told me not to worry, that stuff like that happens, it's part of the game."

 

Added Narron, "Third base is a tough position, and very few guys come to the big leagues as good defensive third basemen. There are very few Scott Rolens in the world. As for Edwin, there is no doubt in my mind he's going to handle it and be an outstanding third baseman.

__________________

The perfect description of Reds GM Dan O'Brien and his offseason spending spree:

 

"Lyle Lanley: Y'know, a town with money is a little like the mule with a spinning wheel. No one knows how he got it and danged if he knows how to use it".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(SoxFan1 @ Aug 4, 2005 -> 03:05 PM)
They have to deny it, it would be direspectful to the players to say "Yeah. I agreed to get rid of his ass but then I 2nd guessed it. Meh."

 

 

They would have had to talk to him about it in the first place.

 

Sounds like the bulls*** hit the fan.. :rolly

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm glad to hear this. I thought the deal the Nightengale talked about would not have been a good one for the Sox. We don't need a prima donna like that who ought to have been humbled by several years in a row of zero production.

 

The Reds were a playoff team before he arrived, but haven't whiffed .500 since, isn't that right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well the press has hold of it firmly now, so its pretty much dead in my mind. It was a topic on Around the Horn today, and all of the columnists agreed that the White Sox should aggressively pursue him if possible(go figure). All but Woody Paige felt that he would pass through waivers untouched too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(VAfan @ Aug 4, 2005 -> 04:37 PM)
I'm glad to hear this.  I thought the deal the Nightengale talked about would not have been a good one for the Sox.  We don't need a prima donna like that who ought to have been humbled by several years in a row of zero production. 

 

The Reds were a playoff team before he arrived, but haven't whiffed .500 since, isn't that right?

You are WAY off calling the Reds a playoff team before Griffey arrived. The Reds signed Griffey in 2000, that season they went 85-77 (.525), they haven't been in the playoffs since '95 when they went 85-59 (.590) and won the division in the strike shortened year.

 

With Griffey:

'04 - 76-86 (.469)

'03 - 69-93 (.426)

'02 - 78-84 (.481)

'01 - 66-96 (.407)

'00 - 85-77 (.525)

 

Before Griffey:

'99 - 96-67 (.589)

'98 - 77-85 (.475)

'97 - 76-86 (.469)

'96 - 81-81 (.500)

'95 - 85-59 (.590) DIV. Strike Shortened.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...