Jump to content

Insider article on espn


Greg Hibbard

Recommended Posts

QUOTE(southsider2k5 @ Aug 8, 2005 -> 10:05 AM)
Uh I wouldn't cut and paste that.  Copying copyrighted paid material can get Soxtalk sued.  If someone wants to summerize it, that would be cool.  Otherwise it will probably just get deleted anyway.

 

That's one thing I've always wondered about at this site. I see entire articles from various sources posted all over the place.

 

What's the difference in those and this instance?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(Iwritecode @ Aug 8, 2005 -> 12:46 PM)
That's one thing I've always wondered about at this site. I see entire articles from various sources posted all over the place.

 

What's the difference in those and this instance?

Insider is a paid service.

 

The others are not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(knightni @ Aug 8, 2005 -> 04:47 PM)
Insider is a paid service.

 

The others are not.

 

But at the same time, the free sites are free because they get enough advertising revenue from the hits they receive, when we copy and past free stuff, it leads to less hits, which could lead to less advertising revenue, which could lead to no more free stuff. I think the best policy is to copy and paste highlights and provide links to full articles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(knightni @ Aug 8, 2005 -> 10:47 AM)
Insider is a paid service.

 

The others are not.

 

What about the little line I see at the bottom of every Tribune article?

 

Copyright © 2005, The Chicago Tribune

 

Doesn't that me you aren't supposed to copy the entire thing?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(knightni @ Aug 8, 2005 -> 03:15 PM)
Their content should be okay to use.

 

As long as there is a link to it, I don't see what is wrong with copying and pasting it.

 

The Chicago Tribune's website is hardly a pay site.

 

I thought that was the whole point of copyrighted material. Whether it's free or not. Wasn't that what the whole Napster lawsuit was about?

 

Just don't want to see the site get into legal trouble...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(Iwritecode @ Aug 8, 2005 -> 05:19 PM)
I thought that was the whole point of copyrighted material. Whether it's free or not. Wasn't that what the whole Napster lawsuit was about?

 

Just don't want to see the site get into legal trouble...

Yes, but music was never given away free on the web sites of the recording studios.

 

These articles are given away free on the Tribune's website.

 

ESPN is not giving away their Insider articles for free.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(knightni @ Aug 8, 2005 -> 03:24 PM)
Yes, but music was never given away free on the web sites of the recording studios.

 

These articles are given away free on the Tribune's website.

 

ESPN is not giving away their Insider articles for free.

 

Cool. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(Iwritecode @ Aug 8, 2005 -> 04:08 PM)
What about the little line I see at the bottom of every Tribune article?

Doesn't that me you aren't supposed to copy the entire thing?

I think that mean you can use as long as you dont make money off of it

Edited by ScottPodRulez22
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...