Soxy Posted August 12, 2005 Share Posted August 12, 2005 I finally finished my master's proposal (my Herculean task of the summer) and will be giving it to members of my committee in the next hour (after I make copies, and dance joyously in my office). I AM SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO HAPPY!!!!!! So cross your fingers and hope that they enjoy "Schwa Deletion and Epenthesis: Acquiring phonological variants using an artificial lexicon" as much as I do! WOOHOOOOOOOOOOO! Hopefully I'll propose the first week of September then start running participants soon after that! HAHAHAHAHAAHAHA! I win. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted August 12, 2005 Share Posted August 12, 2005 I have no idea what any of that means, so I'll just say CONGRATS SOXY!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnB Posted August 12, 2005 Share Posted August 12, 2005 you don't need no fancy book learnin congrats Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SleepyWhiteSox Posted August 12, 2005 Share Posted August 12, 2005 Congrats. Sounded like a learning and cognition class that I took, so just like that class, I have no idea what you're talking about either... Will you be able to share a little bit of what the proposal is and what the experiments generally consist of? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Queen Prawn Posted August 12, 2005 Share Posted August 12, 2005 Congrats! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kapkomet Posted August 12, 2005 Share Posted August 12, 2005 It's great when it all comes together, isn't it Soxy? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rex Kickass Posted August 12, 2005 Share Posted August 12, 2005 Is this the same Schwa that had that game show on ESPN? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Milkman delivers Posted August 12, 2005 Share Posted August 12, 2005 (edited) You shouldn't pat yourself on the back so much. I'd never do anything like that. You should be more humble, like me. Congratulations! Edited August 12, 2005 by Milkman delivers Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LowerCaseRepublican Posted August 12, 2005 Share Posted August 12, 2005 No children, I'm not crazy writing an upside down e on the board. It is the schwa. Congrats! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Critic Posted August 12, 2005 Share Posted August 12, 2005 QUOTE(ChiSoxyGirl @ Aug 12, 2005 -> 12:24 PM) So cross your fingers and hope that they enjoy "Schwa Deletion and Epenthesis: Acquiring phonological variants using an artificial lexicon" as much as I do! WOOHOOOOOOOOOOO! I have the comic book version of that, and Ben Affleck would be AWESOME in a film adaptation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted August 12, 2005 Share Posted August 12, 2005 I can imagine you feel roughly about the same way I did right after I passed my oral qualifying exams here. (I cleaned up my office for want of anything better to do) Congrats! Go have a beer. It helps. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soxy Posted August 12, 2005 Author Share Posted August 12, 2005 QUOTE(SleepyWhiteSox @ Aug 12, 2005 -> 02:56 PM) Will you be able to share a little bit of what the proposal is and what the experiments generally consist of? Thank you so much everyone! I'm so happy to be done writing it--that I honestly haven't stopped smiling like an idiot. So, thank you all! Here's the Reader's Digest Version (you all get spared the 25 pager): The schwa is an unstressed vowel (like the first vowel in: believe, suppose, tureen and the second in catholic, general, and broccoli). We've found in a previous research you can pronounce words without the schwa and people will still recognize them. Unfortunately, the frequency of the deletion rate of the schwa and actual word frequencies vary so much that it is hard to manipulate only deletion rate. So, I made up a lexicon of 32 words (two and three syllable) that have a schwa in the same position as the previous examples and the same stress pattern. The question is: if the frequency with which participants hear the words is controlled and only the deletion frequency is manipulated will participants learn one form better? Other research has shown that inserting a schwa into a word (where there is NO schwa really, called epenthesis) causes faster and more accurate recognition. Other research suggests that the presence or absence of a schwa is not as predictive as the actual frequency with which they hear either production. So, we're trying to figure out if one of those two theories (it's the extra schwa or it's frequency) is a better predictor of how people will acquire the variant productions of the word. Should be interesting. I'm excited. And now, I'm going on vacation!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonyho7476 Posted August 12, 2005 Share Posted August 12, 2005 QUOTE(ChiSoxyGirl @ Aug 12, 2005 -> 02:54 PM) Thank you so much everyone! I'm so happy to be done writing it--that I honestly haven't stopped smiling like an idiot. So, thank you all! Here's the Reader's Digest Version (you all get spared the 25 pager): The schwa is an unstressed vowel (like the first vowel in: believe, suppose, tureen and the second in catholic, general, and broccoli). We've found in a previous research you can pronounce words without the schwa and people will still recognize them. Unfortunately, the frequency of the deletion rate of the schwa and actual word frequencies vary so much that it is hard to manipulate only deletion rate. So, I made up a lexicon of 32 words (two and three syllable) that have a schwa in the same position as the previous examples and the same stress pattern. The question is: if the frequency with which participants hear the words is controlled and only the deletion frequency is manipulated will participants learn one form better? Other research has shown that inserting a schwa into a word (where there is NO schwa really, called epenthesis) causes faster and more accurate recognition. Other research suggests that the presence or absence of a schwa is not as predictive as the actual frequency with which they hear either production. So, we're trying to figure out if one of those two theories (it's the extra schwa or it's frequency) is a better predictor of how people will acquire the variant productions of the word. Should be interesting. I'm excited. And now, I'm going on vacation!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Hey, whatever floats your boat! Seriously, congrats. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greasywheels121 Posted August 12, 2005 Share Posted August 12, 2005 Congrats Soxy! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanOfCorn Posted August 12, 2005 Share Posted August 12, 2005 The new name for my band, Schwa Deletion (previous: Squeegee). Congrats... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AddisonStSox Posted August 12, 2005 Share Posted August 12, 2005 Wow! That is a very, very impressive task. Don't let anyone tell you otherwise. Congrats. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EvilJester99 Posted August 13, 2005 Share Posted August 13, 2005 Congrats Soxy!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chisoxfn Posted August 13, 2005 Share Posted August 13, 2005 Congrats Chisoxy. Some of the sounds like my Anthro class I took on the history of modern language (the lexicon aspects at least). Heck of an accomplishment and you've definately earned a nice celebration Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rowand44 Posted August 13, 2005 Share Posted August 13, 2005 QUOTE(southsider2k5 @ Aug 12, 2005 -> 12:26 PM) I have no idea what any of that means, so I'll just say CONGRATS SOXY!!! Ya, that. Congrats Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DBAHO Posted August 13, 2005 Share Posted August 13, 2005 Congrats on finally finishing it Soxy!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YASNY Posted August 13, 2005 Share Posted August 13, 2005 Congrats Soxy! All Hail The Queen of Schwa! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goldmember Posted August 14, 2005 Share Posted August 14, 2005 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Texsox Posted August 15, 2005 Share Posted August 15, 2005 Congrats Soxy!! Soxy, I assume this is limited to English speaking or will you expand to other languages? How are you controlling for each individual's English mastery? How are you controlling the pronunciations? Will the test be taped and played back? What ages are you testing? If the pronunciation has, for example, a midwest accent, and the participant is from the Bronx, how do you think that may affect the results? The topic is fascinating, controlling the experiment seems like a Herculean task. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.