Chi Town Sox Posted August 30, 2005 Share Posted August 30, 2005 Can anyone here think of an instance where a public figure (athlete, presidential, etc.) apologized publicly about a mistake that he/she made but did not have to apologize. Such as Bill Clinton apoligizing about Monica Lewinski when he was caught, I need the opposite of that. A person apologizing about something when not having to. All help would be appreciated thanks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steff Posted August 30, 2005 Share Posted August 30, 2005 Kobe apologizing for rap.. err.. having sex with that girl from Colorado. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyyle23 Posted August 30, 2005 Share Posted August 30, 2005 (edited) Michael Irvin apologizing for having a suitcase full of coke and hookers in a Dallas hotel room. edit: Steffs reply threw me off Irvin shouldnt have apologized, he should have been thrown in the pokey. Edited August 30, 2005 by kyyle23 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kid Gleason Posted August 30, 2005 Share Posted August 30, 2005 QUOTE(Steff @ Aug 30, 2005 -> 01:52 PM) Kobe apologizing for rap.. err.. having sex with that girl from Colorado. I didn't know Kobe knew how to rap! He should hook up with that Kayne fella from Chicago. Heck, if they both Rap...they might already know each other. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FlaSoxxJim Posted August 30, 2005 Share Posted August 30, 2005 QUOTE(kyyle23 @ Aug 30, 2005 -> 02:55 PM) Michael Irvin apologizing for having a suitcase full of coke and hookers in a Dallas hotel room. edit: Steffs reply threw me off Irvin shouldnt have apologized, he should have been thrown in the pokey. How many hookers did he have stuffed into the suitcase? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chi Town Sox Posted August 30, 2005 Author Share Posted August 30, 2005 Sorry I guess i phrased it wrong, from what i know kobe and irvin were caught in their acts. i guess what i wanted to say was that the public figure came "out of the blue" and apologized when noone knew about it or wouldve found out. Thanks alot Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wong & Owens Posted August 30, 2005 Share Posted August 30, 2005 Did Pat O'Brien make any public apologies? I hope not, because no one need be sorry for providing that level of comedy. How about hypocritical televangelist Jimmy Swaggart's blubbering after the thing with, hmm, who was it? not Jessica Hahn, not Fawn Hall, what was her name? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FlaSoxxJim Posted August 30, 2005 Share Posted August 30, 2005 QUOTE(Chi Town Sox @ Aug 30, 2005 -> 03:00 PM) Sorry I guess i phrased it wrong, from what i know kobe and irvin were caught in their acts. i guess what i wanted to say was that the public figure came "out of the blue" and apologized when noone knew about it or wouldve found out. Thanks alot Public figures so that ALL THE TIME. Honestly, no public figure is going to come out with dirt on himself unless he knows the s*** is about to hit the fan. That's human nature. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FlaSoxxJim Posted August 30, 2005 Share Posted August 30, 2005 QUOTE(Wong & Owens @ Aug 30, 2005 -> 03:00 PM) Did Pat O'Brien make any public apologies? I hope not, because no one need be sorry for providing that level of comedy. How about hypocritical televangelist Jimmy Swaggart's blubbering after the thing with, hmm, who was it? not Jessica Hahn, not Fawn Hall, what was her name? But he said he 'only stuck the tip in.' Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chi Town Sox Posted August 30, 2005 Author Share Posted August 30, 2005 I think it's a stupid paper to assign also but some public figures had to come out and admit something in order to have a paper assigned on it, well now that i think of it my teacher is kind of wacked Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steff Posted August 30, 2005 Share Posted August 30, 2005 QUOTE(kyyle23 @ Aug 30, 2005 -> 02:55 PM) edit: Steffs reply threw me off Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FlaSoxxJim Posted August 31, 2005 Share Posted August 31, 2005 You know, I've been thinking about the question, and I think I may have a plausible answer in Jimmy Carter. For trhose too young to remember, carter was crucified for admitting that he had "lusted in his heart" for women other than his wife in a 1976 Playboy interview. I can concede that his Presidency left a lot to be desired, but the guy had integrity and pretty much did nothing more than admit to what we all know everybody does. It's simple human nature to have sexual fantasies. In the interview he evenwent as far as saying that he didn't consider himslf any better than an actual adulturer because the sins were no different in the eyes of his God. It didn't save him from being publicly skewered however. So, basically, he admitted a wrongdoing (at least in the eyes to his God) that he didn't have to - and got a lot of grief for his trouble. Here's the Playboy synopsis: Carter took a lot of heat for admitting to Playboy's Barry Golson and Robert Scheer that he "lusted in his heart" in our November 1976 issue. Asked about his religious beliefs, Carter replied, "Christ said, 'I tell you that anyone who looks on a woman with lust has in his heart already committed adultery.' I've looked on a lot of women with lust. I've committed adultery in my heart many times. This is something that God recognizes I will do -- and I have done it -- and God forgives me for it. But that doesn't mean that I condemn someone who not only looks on a woman with lust but who leaves his wife and shacks up with somebody out of wedlock. Christ says, Don't consider yourself better than someone else because one guy screws a whole bunch of women while the other guy is loyal to his wife." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Texsox Posted August 31, 2005 Share Posted August 31, 2005 QUOTE(FlaSoxxJim @ Aug 30, 2005 -> 07:58 PM) You know, I've been thinking about the question, and I think I may have a plausible answer in Jimmy Carter. For those too young to remember, carter was crucified for admitting that he had "lusted in his heart" for women other than his wife in a 1976 Playboy interview. I can concede that his Presidency left a lot to be desired, but the guy had integrity and pretty much did nothing more than admit to what we all know everybody does. It's simple human nature to have sexual fantasies. In the interview he even went as far as saying that he didn't consider himself any better than an actual adulterer because the sins were no different in the eyes of his God. It didn't save him from being publicly skewered however. So, basically, he admitted a wrongdoing (at least in the eyes to his God) that he didn't have to - and got a lot of grief for his trouble. Here's the Playboy synopsis: Damn you. I was just getting ready to post that. Carter has also done more for humanity and has been a greater ex-President thank anyone else. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FlaSoxxJim Posted August 31, 2005 Share Posted August 31, 2005 QUOTE(Texsox @ Aug 30, 2005 -> 10:12 PM) Carter has also done more for humanity and has been a greater ex-President than anyone else. True that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Texsox Posted August 31, 2005 Share Posted August 31, 2005 I felt like such a geek, that question had been buzzing around my head all day. All of a sudden the lusting interview came to mind. Sadly, I was thinking great PR blunders. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.