Cali Posted May 8, 2003 Share Posted May 8, 2003 Since we lost today, I'm sure we'll see a different line-up tomorrow, I'll try to come up one, that mixes what worked last year, and what worked yetserday, we'll see if JM thinks the same.... Jimenez Thomas Lee Ordonez Konerko Valentin Crede Olivo/Alomar Harris Graffy showed today why he's a awesome utility player, not an everyday starter Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
baggio202 Posted May 8, 2003 Share Posted May 8, 2003 vrs rhp 2b graffy ca olivo rf maggs dh thomas ss valentin lf lee 1b konerko cf rios 3b crede Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whitesox247 Posted May 8, 2003 Share Posted May 8, 2003 Oh JM will never turn down the chance to tinker How about: Konerko (the Speedster!) Crede Harris Olivo Jimenez Valentin Lee Thomas Ordonez Think that'll work? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heads22 Posted May 9, 2003 Share Posted May 9, 2003 Since we lost today, I'm sure we'll see a different line-up tomorrow, I'll try to come up one, that mixes what worked last year, and what worked yetserday, we'll see if JM thinks the same.... Jimenez Thomas Lee Ordonez Konerko Valentin Crede Olivo/Alomar Harris Graffy showed today why he's a awesome utility player, not an everyday starter I agree. I think he helps this team the most when he is a pinch-hitter/runner and the so-such. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YASNY Posted May 9, 2003 Share Posted May 9, 2003 Hey baggs. I like the idea of Olivo batting 2nd. If he could handle the responsibilities involved with batting in that slot, and still learn the ins and outs of handling a pitching staff, I think he'd be very good there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Be Good Posted May 9, 2003 Share Posted May 9, 2003 Oh JM will never turn down the chance to tinker How about: Konerko (the Speedster!) Crede Harris Olivo Jimenez Valentin Lee Thomas Ordonez Think that'll work? NO, not all leave Mr. Hurt at the 2 hole BE GOOD Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
baggio202 Posted May 9, 2003 Share Posted May 9, 2003 Hey baggs. I like the idea of Olivo batting 2nd. If he could handle the responsibilities involved with batting in that slot, and still learn the ins and outs of handling a pitching staff, I think he'd be very good there. i think so too..with his speed and ability to bunt..he could be real successful there...plus that means we can drop a bigger bat down in the order and not have so many automatic outs... i'd toy wit the idea of leading him off some games too...but i remember jason kendall saying the worst thing about leading off for a catcher is playing at home and having to rush in after the first inning and get all the gear off and get ready to hit...he said thats the biggest detriment to a catcher leading off...but with olivo's speed and what seems like better plate discipline he could be this team's answer to getting some speed up there...id feel much better with jimeneez 2nd than leading off...cause with jimenez's lack of speed might as well let frank lead off Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YASNY Posted May 9, 2003 Share Posted May 9, 2003 You don't have to have blazing speed to lead off. OBP is the big key. Look at what Oakland did with Jeremy Giambi... that seemed to work out for them for awhile. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
baggio202 Posted May 9, 2003 Share Posted May 9, 2003 You don't have to have blazing speed to lead off. OBP is the big key. Look at what Oakland did with Jeremy Giambi... that seemed to work out for them for awhile. but you have to have some....and i dont think giambi in the lead off spot worked that well since billy bean dumped him for john mabry...i know the game has change..maybe past me by a little for my likes...but i really love a lead off man that can put pressure on the defense and be the guy to manufacture runs Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YASNY Posted May 9, 2003 Share Posted May 9, 2003 but you have to have some....and i dont think giambi in the lead off spot worked that well since billy bean dumped him for john mabry...i know the game has change..maybe past me by a little for my likes...but i really love a lead off man that can put pressure on the defense and be the guy to manufacture runs I agree that any weapon is an asset, including speed. But in the AL game, it's more of the Earl Weaver style of baseball.... wait for the three run homer. I don't agree with it, but that's the way it is. I'm more pitching, defense, on base percentage type of baseball.... moving the runner, etc. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
baggio202 Posted May 9, 2003 Share Posted May 9, 2003 I agree that any weapon is an asset, including speed. But in the AL game, it's more of the Earl Weaver style of baseball.... wait for the three run homer. I don't agree with it, but that's the way it is. I'm more pitching, defense, on base percentage type of baseball.... moving the runner, etc. one thing is fir sure..the sox are doing neither rght now Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YASNY Posted May 9, 2003 Share Posted May 9, 2003 one thing is fir sure..the sox are doing neither rght now Agreed Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.