TLAK Posted September 7, 2005 Share Posted September 7, 2005 With Hermanson’s back situation and having 6 starters for 4 playoff slots I think we better find out how good Brandon McCarthy is as a reliever. Nobody’s going to start ahead of Buehrle, Garland or Garcia. We know Oz is in love with El Duke in big games. We also know that Contreras can pitch effectively in relief, as he has done it before. But we don’t know about McCarthy. He’s certainly not afraid of anyone and, since his return, he has been very effective against two good hitting teams. The White Sox will see nothing but good hitting teams in the playoffs, and the more options not named Vizcaino the better. He’ll be rested up from his Monday start this weekend, I’d like to see Ozzie spot him a few batters or an inning a couple times against the Angels just to see how he does. Does he warm fast enough? Is he as effective without mulling scouting reports for a week before his appearance? How well does he bounce back from a short outing –is he available next day or day after? If he’s as good in short stints as he looked in his starts against Texas and Boston, Brandon could be the stake driven into the evil heart of the other team at crunch time. I’d like to find out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kalapse Posted September 7, 2005 Share Posted September 7, 2005 Actually, Contreras was pretty ineffective out of the pen for the Yankees in the playoffs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heads22 Posted September 7, 2005 Share Posted September 7, 2005 And, I don't want to be a jinx, but the Count has been lights out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TLAK Posted September 7, 2005 Author Share Posted September 7, 2005 QUOTE(Kalapse @ Sep 7, 2005 -> 01:03 PM) Actually, Contreras was pretty ineffective out of the pen for the Yankees in the playoffs. Just looked it up. He was good 3 out of 4 times both against the Red Sox and Marlins. So 6 outings with no runs, 1 with 3 Vs Boston and 1 with 4 Vs Florida. He's inconsistant, its not any different than he does as a starter. On a good night he's lights out, on a bad --get him out of there! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsideirish71 Posted September 7, 2005 Share Posted September 7, 2005 Garson (Chicago, IL): What, if any, impact do you see Brandon McCarthy having down the strecth and in the playoffs? Robby (Chicago): What would do with the White Sox pitching staff at this point after the two huge starts they got out of the rookie McCarthy? Would you switch to a 6-man rotation and give the staff an extra day of rest on route to the playoffs or would you make him a relief pitcher? SportsNation Jim Callis: (2:25 PM ET ) I would go to a six-man staff for a couple of weeks and include him in the playoff rotation. He's so deceptive that he misses more bats than anyone else in that rotation, which depends heavily on a good defense behind them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WilliamTell Posted September 7, 2005 Share Posted September 7, 2005 (edited) I think Contreras should be our 4th guy in my opinion. And I would favor not having McCarthy on the playoff roster just because I think the other guys we have had worked pretty well most of the year. But if Hermanson can't go, then sure, let's see what McCarthy can do. Jenks, Cotts, Marte, Politte, Vizciano all deserve to be on the post season roster. Edited September 7, 2005 by WilliamTell Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kalapse Posted September 7, 2005 Share Posted September 7, 2005 QUOTE(WilliamTell @ Sep 7, 2005 -> 01:51 PM) I think Contreras should be our 4th guy in my opinion. And I would favor not having McCarthy on the playoff roster just because I think the other guys we have had worked pretty well most of the year. But if Hermanson can't go, then sure, let's see what McCarthy can do. Jenks, Cotts, Marte, Politte, Vizciano all deserve to be on the post season roster. Viz, not so much. I'm 1000X more comfortable seeing BMac than Viz. Which sounds insane. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SleepyWhiteSox Posted September 7, 2005 Share Posted September 7, 2005 QUOTE(WilliamTell @ Sep 7, 2005 -> 01:51 PM) Vizciano all deserve to be on the post season roster. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoxFanForever Posted September 7, 2005 Share Posted September 7, 2005 QUOTE(Kalapse @ Sep 7, 2005 -> 06:54 PM) Viz, not so much. I'm 1000X more comfortable seeing BMac than Viz. Which sounds insane. It isn't insane. You are just in touch with reality Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WilliamTell Posted September 7, 2005 Share Posted September 7, 2005 (edited) I'm just saying that right now I prefere Viz, but I haven't seen McCarthy in a relieving role. My opinion could change. Edited September 7, 2005 by WilliamTell Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpringfieldFan Posted September 7, 2005 Share Posted September 7, 2005 (edited) Sure, try Brandon as a reliever, but... Just promise me that if he is dominent in the pen that he won't be considered "too valuable" a reliever to be used as a starter again (i.e. the "Cotts" theorem). SFF Edited September 7, 2005 by SpringfieldFan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted September 7, 2005 Share Posted September 7, 2005 QUOTE(SpringfieldFan @ Sep 7, 2005 -> 01:58 PM) Sure, try Brandon as a reliever, but... Just promise me that if he is dominent in the pen that he won't be considered "too valuable" a reliever to be used as a starter again (i.e. the "Cotts" theorem). SFF That is 1 promise I can give to you 110%. I want this kid throwing 7 innings every 5th game starting next year. The last 2 games have at least sold me on that...especially if he works on adding in another pitch in the offseason. I still don't think Cotts has the pitches to be a dominant starter, but he has the pitches to be a dominant reliever. And on top of that...he's a lefty...and lefty relievers that can get people out are a hell of a prize in this game today. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaliSoxFanViaSWside Posted September 7, 2005 Share Posted September 7, 2005 QUOTE(Balta1701 @ Sep 7, 2005 -> 02:27 PM) I want this kid throwing 7 innings every 5th game starting next year. The last 2 games have at least sold me on that...especially if he works on adding in another pitch in the offseason. I think he's already shown it's not absolutly necessary to add another pitch. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted September 7, 2005 Share Posted September 7, 2005 QUOTE(CaliSoxFanViaSWside @ Sep 7, 2005 -> 02:56 PM) I think he's already shown it's not absolutly necessary to add another pitch. Not absolutely necessary...but could it really hurt? Just to have 1 more pitch in his back pocket that he throws like 2 or 3 times per game just to throw people completely off? A slider or a cutter? I think that'd just be the icing on the cake. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted September 7, 2005 Share Posted September 7, 2005 QUOTE(Balta1701 @ Sep 7, 2005 -> 05:09 PM) Not absolutely necessary...but could it really hurt? Just to have 1 more pitch in his back pocket that he throws like 2 or 3 times per game just to throw people completely off? A slider or a cutter? I think that'd just be the icing on the cake. I bet money they try to add a cutter in the offseason. Its the Sox MO. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted September 7, 2005 Share Posted September 7, 2005 QUOTE(southsider2k5 @ Sep 7, 2005 -> 04:36 PM) I bet money they try to add a cutter in the offseason. Its the Sox MO. I think we were actually talking about this in a thread about a month ago when Brandon finally started getting his act together at AAA...they were talking about how there were plans to work on a new pitch with him in the offseason, but if my memory serves it actually wasn't a cutter, which was surprising to me because as you say it is their MO. Even if it were I wouldn't complain...it worked pretty well for Loaiza when he found one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colorado Sox Fan Posted September 7, 2005 Share Posted September 7, 2005 Give him a start this weekend. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted September 7, 2005 Share Posted September 7, 2005 QUOTE(Colorado Sox Fan @ Sep 7, 2005 -> 04:50 PM) Give him a start this weekend. Ok, so here's the question...do you want to go with the 6 man rotation, give BMac the starts, and potentially cost Mark/Jon 1 start a piece and a win that could make the difference in the Cy Young race, or do you go with the 5 man rotation and try to give those 2 the best shot you can? Personally...I plan for the playoffs at all costs, and go with the 6 man as long as Brandon can take it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greg775 Posted September 8, 2005 Share Posted September 8, 2005 Tough call. It's why Oz and KW get the big bucks. I sure hope the 2 ex Yanks come through in the playoffs and/or Series. I'd almost rather have McCarthy starting and continuing his hot sizz. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted September 8, 2005 Share Posted September 8, 2005 QUOTE(Balta1701 @ Sep 7, 2005 -> 06:54 PM) Ok, so here's the question...do you want to go with the 6 man rotation, give BMac the starts, and potentially cost Mark/Jon 1 start a piece and a win that could make the difference in the Cy Young race, or do you go with the 5 man rotation and try to give those 2 the best shot you can? Personally...I plan for the playoffs at all costs, and go with the 6 man as long as Brandon can take it. Personal rewards mean nothing to me. Getting the rotation rested and set for the playoffs, and seeing if Brandon should be in the 2006 rotation mean way more than a Cy Young, as they should to this team. The thing that has gotten this team as far as it has, is the total lack of ego on the playing field. Hitters are willing to give up ABs to move runners over, pitchers are willing to do whatever Ozzie asks them etc. This team isn't talented enough to win as individuals, and if the pitchers are worried about CY awards, they aren't going to win in the playoffs anyway. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.