mreye Posted September 14, 2005 Share Posted September 14, 2005 QUOTE(YASNY @ Sep 14, 2005 -> 10:56 AM) Sounds like Marte needed his mommy. Yes. I don't think I've seen this in this thread, but I've always got the feeling that Marte thought he should be the closer. It seems like everytime he goes out we tries to blow people away, using it as an audition for Ozzie or even other team that may be interested. And now, all that pressure he's put on himself to be the closer has just gotten to him. Just a thought. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AddisonStSox Posted September 14, 2005 Share Posted September 14, 2005 QUOTE(DBAH0 @ Sep 14, 2005 -> 08:47 AM) Welcome aboard to Soxtalk. Let's just hope this doesn't affect Marte's trade value significantly. He could be a good pawn to use in a Rowand + Marte for Juan Pierre, or Marte + El Duque + prospect for Chad Tracy. And in the off-season, expect the Sox to go after another lefty for the pen. Candidates include Scott Eyre, Scott Sauerbeck, Ricardo Rincon, Chris Hammond and Valerio De Los Santos. If I'm not mistaken, Juan Pierre is a UFA after this season. Expect many teams, including the cuddily ones from the Northside to make serious attemps to bring him in. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LosMediasBlancas Posted September 14, 2005 Share Posted September 14, 2005 Back in April, who woulda thought no Shingo AND no Marte by Sept.? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soxfest Posted September 14, 2005 Share Posted September 14, 2005 Marte acts like a 7 yr old Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RockRaines Posted September 14, 2005 Share Posted September 14, 2005 QUOTE(Tony82087 @ Sep 14, 2005 -> 01:16 PM) As of Septmember 14th, my perfect off-season would be to re-sign Paul, let Carl and Frank walk, sign Furcal, move Juan over to 3b, do a package Marte-Duque and Tracy for Overbay, so you platoon Overbay and Paul at 1b/DH. You then go out and sign a swingman, maybe bring Loaiza back, put him in the pen as and as a longman/6th SP, then like you said, bring in a Scott Eyre to give us another LHP. Sorry, dont want to turn this into an off-season thread. there is no reason for us to not go after Washburn as our additional starter. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beck72 Posted September 14, 2005 Share Posted September 14, 2005 QUOTE(RockRaines @ Sep 14, 2005 -> 07:25 PM) there is no reason for us to not go after Washburn as our additional starter. I could think of two reasons--El duque and bmac. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted September 14, 2005 Share Posted September 14, 2005 QUOTE(beck72 @ Sep 14, 2005 -> 12:54 PM) I could think of two reasons--El duque and bmac. So in other words, you can think of 1 reason. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beck72 Posted September 14, 2005 Share Posted September 14, 2005 QUOTE(Balta1701 @ Sep 14, 2005 -> 08:02 PM) So in other words, you can think of 1 reason. yes Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greasywheels121 Posted September 14, 2005 Share Posted September 14, 2005 QUOTE(Kristy @ Sep 14, 2005 -> 09:41 AM) Good!!!!! He's a waste of space. Welcome to SoxTalk. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpringfieldFan Posted September 14, 2005 Share Posted September 14, 2005 I still remember in the days right before the trading deadline when Marte was rumored to be a pawn in some of those trades. I recall Ozzie (or was it Coop?) mentioning that Marte's feelings would get hurt about it. That right there made me lose faith in Damaso. You can't be fragile and be a late innings guy. SFF Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qwerty Posted September 14, 2005 Share Posted September 14, 2005 QUOTE(AddisonStSox @ Sep 14, 2005 -> 01:08 PM) If I'm not mistaken, Juan Pierre is a UFA after this season. Expect many teams, including the cuddily ones from the Northside to make serious attemps to bring him in. Every free agent is unrestricted... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beck72 Posted September 14, 2005 Share Posted September 14, 2005 QUOTE(Tony82087 @ Sep 14, 2005 -> 08:10 PM) So your saying you want Mark-Jon-Jose-Freddy-Bmac-AND WASHBURN???? I dont think any of those 6 would go for that..... Plus, Washburn would get the kind of contract that should go to Garland. Not exactly how the sox should "take care of their own". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RockRaines Posted September 14, 2005 Share Posted September 14, 2005 QUOTE(beck72 @ Sep 14, 2005 -> 02:54 PM) I could think of two reasons--El duque and bmac. this was based on the previous comment of trading contreras and my position has always been of getting rid of El Puke, he is done. My rotation would be Mark John Wash Freddy BMAC Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beck72 Posted September 14, 2005 Share Posted September 14, 2005 QUOTE(RockRaines @ Sep 14, 2005 -> 08:52 PM) this was based on the previous comment of trading contreras and my position has always been of getting rid of El Puke, he is done. My rotation would be Mark John Wash Freddy BMAC Trade the hottest SP down the stretch who finally seems to have harnessed his potential, for Washburn who likely will get a 3, 4 yr deal for close to $24 mill? The sox should and probably will try to sign Garland to a 3 yr deal. Not Washburn. And the sox can use the money to get AJ signed to a similar deal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fathom Posted September 14, 2005 Share Posted September 14, 2005 Washburn would give up a ton of homers at the Cell. Not only that, but Washburn seems to get arm/shoulder injuries at least once a season. For the amount of money he'll get, I wouldn't even consider it. We need more help than just a possible 5th starter. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gene Honda Civic Posted September 14, 2005 Share Posted September 14, 2005 QUOTE(fathom @ Sep 14, 2005 -> 03:58 PM) Washburn would give up a ton of homers at the Cell. Not only that, but Washburn seems to get arm/shoulder injuries at least once a season. For the amount of money he'll get, I wouldn't even consider it. We need more help than just a possible 5th starter. You mean like today.... They had to call up an emergency starter to take his place today. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qwerty Posted September 14, 2005 Share Posted September 14, 2005 (edited) QUOTE(beck72 @ Sep 14, 2005 -> 03:58 PM) Trade the hottest SP down the stretch who finally seems to have harnessed his potential, for Washburn who likely will get a 3, 4 yr deal for close to $24 mill? The sox should and probably will try to sign Garland to a 3 yr deal. Not Washburn. And the sox can use the money to get AJ signed to a similar deal. If we can trade an old, semi expensive, pitcher with one year left on his contract for someone that will be helping for years to come... i am all for it. But signing washburn who is an extreme fly ball pitcher for seven million a year to put up a 4.25 era+? He would probally give up fourty homers a season here. But that is not that bad considering milton would give up about 60 because he is such a piece of s***. Edited September 14, 2005 by qwerty Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RockRaines Posted September 14, 2005 Share Posted September 14, 2005 QUOTE(beck72 @ Sep 14, 2005 -> 03:58 PM) Trade the hottest SP down the stretch who finally seems to have harnessed his potential, for Washburn who likely will get a 3, 4 yr deal for close to $24 mill? The sox should and probably will try to sign Garland to a 3 yr deal. Not Washburn. And the sox can use the money to get AJ signed to a similar deal. I didnt say I wanted ot trade JC, this was in reaction to the previous post mentioning the theory, I was reacting in the same mindset. Jeez, what happened to people reading threads and not the msot recent post :banghead :banghead :banghead Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beck72 Posted September 14, 2005 Share Posted September 14, 2005 (edited) QUOTE(RockRaines @ Sep 14, 2005 -> 09:10 PM) I didnt say I wanted ot trade JC, this was in reaction to the previous post mentioning the theory, I was reacting in the same mindset. Jeez, what happened to people reading threads and not the msot recent post :banghead :banghead :banghead maybe because people don't have time to spend all day looking at every post of every thread And you seemed to like the idea of trading JC, since you put Bmac and Washburn in the 4 and 5 spots. Correct? Edited September 14, 2005 by beck72 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heads22 Posted September 14, 2005 Share Posted September 14, 2005 I'm amazed how many people still spell Garland's name J-o-h-n... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greasywheels121 Posted September 14, 2005 Share Posted September 14, 2005 http://whitesoxpride.mlblogs.com/inside_th.../wednesday.html Marte Damaso Marte saw our team physician today and continues to be bothered by a sore left trapezius. No sense yet on when or if he will be available for the rest of this season. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RockRaines Posted September 14, 2005 Share Posted September 14, 2005 QUOTE(beck72 @ Sep 14, 2005 -> 04:12 PM) maybe because people don't have time to spend all day looking at every post of every thread And you seemed to like the idea of trading JC, since you put Bmac and Washburn in the 4 and 5 spots. Correct? No, that was in response to IF we traded him for Overbay in that scenario. Read my posts in other threads. I actually want to keep JC because I think he has the best potential. Not only that, but I have said I want to start him in the first game of the playoffs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AddisonStSox Posted September 14, 2005 Share Posted September 14, 2005 QUOTE(qwerty @ Sep 14, 2005 -> 02:39 PM) Every free agent is unrestricted... Oh for cripes' sake...point being: we couldn't trade for him even if we wanted to. He'll be a free agent, not available via trade. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Al Lopez Ghost (old) Posted September 15, 2005 Share Posted September 15, 2005 QUOTE(Dick Allen @ Sep 13, 2005 -> 05:53 PM) Kudos to Al Lopez' ghost who did break this story correctly after Sunday's game. No media outlet reported Marte had been thrown off the team, not even Bruce Levine. Thanks Dick. I got a lot of s*** yesterday, but I don't make stuff up. This was the first and probably will be the last time I find something out early like this. By the way, today's Tribune says that Marte was going to his own doctors for a diagnosis, and the story says that pissed off KW. I hadn't seen that posted anywhere. I think the sad part of this is that Damaso never has figured out how good he really is. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lukeman89 Posted September 15, 2005 Share Posted September 15, 2005 i just dont understand the idea of "specialists" i have much more confidence in jenks or politte going up against a lefty than having marte pitch to them, just for the sake of having a lefty vs lefty Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.