Jump to content

Official ruling


IlliniKrush

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 184
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

QUOTE(MurcieOne @ Oct 13, 2005 -> 03:31 AM)
im still pretty sure that Paul didnt get ALLLLLL glove on that ball..... i think the call was right.

 

Paul is a pussy, and his mistake cost his team..... give the AL's best record an  extra out and see what happens.

 

we win, they lose.

 

Dont kid yourself it was clear as day he got his glove on all of the ball... He didnt give us an extra out the Umps horrible mistake did.. that being said as long as it goes in our favor Ill take it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(IlliniKrush @ Oct 12, 2005 -> 09:38 PM)
Wow, Eddings had no clue what to say right there. And half of what he said is basically wrong. You don't rule strike with two different motions.

 

From what it sounds like is that the arm meant no contact and the call meant strike, and he does use that call all game so it's interesting. I still dont know if he caught it. Whoever that head ump guy dude is he seems to think that it hit the ground.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(Rowand44 @ Oct 12, 2005 -> 10:39 PM)
From what it sounds like is that the arm meant no contact and the call meant strike, and he does use that call all game so it's interesting.  I still dont know if he caught it.  Whoever that head ump guy dude is he seems to think that it hit the ground.

They should have never, EVER said they went to replay to try to justify their ruling, and talk about whether or not it hit the ground.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(TheBlackSox8 @ Oct 12, 2005 -> 10:40 PM)
they all sounded shaky when they said the ball changed direction from looking at the reply.

 

Didn't sound all that shaky to me, but as someone posted, there is a reason why they are behind the plate and not a microphone lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(IlliniKrush @ Oct 12, 2005 -> 10:40 PM)
They should have never, EVER said they went to replay to try to justify their ruling, and talk about whether or not it hit the ground.

yeah...that basically shows they were questioning it themselves....and at one point were unsure of themselves and the call

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(IlliniKrush @ Oct 12, 2005 -> 10:40 PM)
They should have never, EVER said they went to replay to try to justify their ruling, and talk about whether or not it hit the ground.

 

I can't blame them for checking it out (especially if there was a protest) considering the first question asked is if they looked at the replay.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(3E8 @ Oct 12, 2005 -> 07:17 PM)
If you are correct, tune in to the Baseball Tonight crew.  You will get a good laugh at how bad they're butchering this rule right now.

I don't think its correct. But I could be wrong. I always thought you call the out and than from there on you make the 2nd call out. Who knows though.

 

I still think it hit the dirt (well i'm fairly confident in that).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(redandwhite @ Oct 12, 2005 -> 10:41 PM)
I believe they protested it immediately.

I'm not an expert on protests, but i'm pretty sure nothing can happen as far as an official protest goes. It's similar to a safe/out call, etc. They can't appeal whether the ball hit the ground, they could only appeal something based off Eddings mechanics behind the plate. And i don't even know if that is possible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(Balance @ Oct 12, 2005 -> 07:31 PM)
While I agree with you 100%, that situation didn't result in a run for the Angels.  That would weaken our "they got some breaks with calls, too" argument on that particular instance.

 

Glad we won, just pointing that out.

 

:gosox4:

It was an inning ending double play and the game winning run scored on the play. Had that slide not been made, the inning would have been over and one less run would have scored.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(redandwhite @ Oct 13, 2005 -> 03:41 AM)
I believe they protested it immediately.

 

Is this something you heard? Only the Sox could have a situation where a playoff game is forced to resume due to a protest overturning a call. Of course, I know there's a .001 pct chance of the protest being successful. And yes, the only reason I could see them protesting is Eddings signaling that AJP was out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(Rowand44 @ Oct 12, 2005 -> 07:39 PM)
From what it sounds like is that the arm meant no contact and the call meant strike, and he does use that call all game so it's interesting.  I still dont know if he caught it.  Whoever that head ump guy dude is he seems to think that it hit the ground.

I don't think there is any set out rule either because you can always change the ruling on a play. How is it any different than a guy being called out and than the umps discuss it and someone else has a better angle and says the ball was trapped. Different situation, yes, but I dont' think there is any set this is your out call. Afterall a lot of umps call different things different.

 

I still say that hit the dirt so whether the ump motioned wrong or not, Paul should have made the tag (if its close you usually do so).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(fathom @ Oct 13, 2005 -> 03:45 AM)
Is this something you heard?  Only the Sox could have a situation where a playoff game is forced to resume due to a protest overturning a call.  Of course, I know there's a .001 pct chance of the protest being successful.  And yes, the only reason I could see them protesting is Eddings signaling that AJP was out.

The crew cheif mentioned that Sciosia protested it immediately during the press conference.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(fathom @ Oct 12, 2005 -> 07:40 PM)
I know this is probably is a very amateurish question, but there's no way that the Angels protested this, is there?

No. I'm 99% sure, but I think the only time you can protest a game is if you do it during the game. You can't do it after the fact, you have to make it known and the remainder of the game is played under protest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(IlliniKrush @ Oct 12, 2005 -> 10:45 PM)
Something i just noticed -

 

Pierzynski started running after the extended arm call meaning he swung through it. I think AJ thought that he wasn't going to rule him out, and started running. AJ never saw the fist call.

Another thing is that Paul flipped the ball back to the mound before the fist call.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...