ZoomSlowik Posted October 25, 2005 Share Posted October 25, 2005 Although none of the moves that this particular fan listed are that out of line (except the Reds might not trade Kearns in their division), the total result is pretty out there. I can't think of any teams that had like 10 new players come from outside the organization in the same year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RockRaines Posted October 25, 2005 Author Share Posted October 25, 2005 QUOTE(kyyle23 @ Oct 25, 2005 -> 10:01 AM) How is this for Cubs messageboard humor Apparently the Tribune Company fell into an extra 60 million dollars this off-season that team just isnt that much better than what they have now. The pitching is not very good, and the bullpen actually almost looks worse. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Critic Posted October 25, 2005 Share Posted October 25, 2005 After the dominant ALCS, I said this to the main Cubbie troll at work: "How's THAT for starters?" ....it didn't get a laugh....except from me, of course. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kalapse Posted October 25, 2005 Share Posted October 25, 2005 QUOTE(The Critic @ Oct 25, 2005 -> 05:50 PM) After the dominant ALCS, I said this to the main Cubbie troll at work: "How's THAT for starters?" ....it didn't get a laugh....except from me, of course. Kinda like most of your jokes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts