SoxFan1 Posted November 8, 2005 Share Posted November 8, 2005 QUOTE(WHarris1 @ Nov 8, 2005 -> 12:34 AM) If 0.776470588 is 1/10 than ya sure... TO TD/gm - Moss TD/gm = 0.11029412 which is approximately 1/10. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoxFan1 Posted November 8, 2005 Share Posted November 8, 2005 QUOTE(SSH2005 @ Nov 8, 2005 -> 12:36 AM) He must have failed math class. Hmmmm. :headshake Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WHarris1 Posted November 8, 2005 Share Posted November 8, 2005 QUOTE(SoxFan1 @ Nov 7, 2005 -> 10:38 PM) TO TD/gm - Moss TD/gm = 0.11029412 which is approximately 1/10. Which equates to 144 yards and 1.6 TD's. I suppose if you want the guy with worse numbers you can have him? Maybe I will go into TO's much better reception totals? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoxFan1 Posted November 8, 2005 Share Posted November 8, 2005 QUOTE(SSH2005 @ Nov 8, 2005 -> 12:38 AM) Moss was really putting up better numbers than TO this year too, just to prove that you're right. :rolly QUOTE(SoxFan1 @ Nov 8, 2005 -> 12:32 AM) Uuuum, what have we heard from Moss AT ALL this season off the field? Nada. And you can't say one is better because his team is better. Uuum, look at what Moss has compared to TO. Yeah. I mean stat wise, Moss is only tops in the league in yards per catch at 20.8! And receptions/rec. yards can't be factored in because the Eagles are a pass team and the Raiders are developing a run game with LaMont Jordan. BTW, Moss has more support in his WR group. I mean all they have is Jerry Porter, Randy Moss, and Doug Gabriel to spread the ball out to. Not to mention a developing young star TE in Courtney Anderson. Eagles pass to To and Westbrook...thats it. Oakland spreads the ball around more. Moss > TO. Sorry. EDIT: No point in fighting. Agree to disagree and thats it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heads22 Posted November 8, 2005 Share Posted November 8, 2005 SF, did you watch yesterday's game? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoxFan1 Posted November 8, 2005 Share Posted November 8, 2005 Which equates to 144 yards and 1.6 TD's. In what perspective? Since 2000, TO has 144 more yards an 1.6 more TD's is what your saying? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoxFan1 Posted November 8, 2005 Share Posted November 8, 2005 QUOTE(Heads22 @ Nov 8, 2005 -> 12:41 AM) SF, did you watch yesterday's game? Nope, sure didnt. What did I miss? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SSH2005 Posted November 8, 2005 Share Posted November 8, 2005 Or maybe Moss can't get open as much as TO can? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WHarris1 Posted November 8, 2005 Share Posted November 8, 2005 SF1 - The Eagles only throw it 5 more times per game than the Raiders. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WHarris1 Posted November 8, 2005 Share Posted November 8, 2005 (edited) QUOTE(SoxFan1 @ Nov 7, 2005 -> 10:42 PM) Which equates to 144 yards and 1.6 TD's. In what perspective? Since 2000, TO has 144 more yards an 1.6 more TD's is what your saying? Per season. Edited November 8, 2005 by WHarris1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DBAHO Posted November 8, 2005 Share Posted November 8, 2005 Question for Soxfan1, if Moss is so good, and the Raiders are developing a running game, why do Jordan and Porter have almost 40 receptions each, and Moss only 26. Yeah Moss has had a hamstring injury, but he hasn't done much in Oakland so far. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoxFan1 Posted November 8, 2005 Share Posted November 8, 2005 QUOTE(WHarris1 @ Nov 8, 2005 -> 12:43 AM) Per season. Uuuum, that isn't much of a difference at all. Take out Moss' worst game and TO's best game and compare. Need I go into the receivers each has played with since 2000 as well? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qwerty Posted November 8, 2005 Share Posted November 8, 2005 QUOTE(SoxFan1 @ Nov 7, 2005 -> 10:44 PM) Uuuum, that isn't much of a difference at all. Take out Moss' worst game and TO's best game and compare. Need I go into the receivers each has played with since 2000 as well? LOL. You are getting desperate. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SSH2005 Posted November 8, 2005 Share Posted November 8, 2005 Uuuum, that isn't much of a difference at all. Take out Moss' worst game and TO's best game and compare. Need I go into the receivers each has played with since 2000 as well? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Why should he have to do that? Those bad games and good games actually happened. You don't just pick and choose stats like that. :rolly When a running back averages 3.0 yards per carry and then makes a huge run to up his average, do you subtract that long run? No, because that's stupid. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoxFan1 Posted November 8, 2005 Share Posted November 8, 2005 QUOTE(DBAH0 @ Nov 8, 2005 -> 12:43 AM) Question for Soxfan1, if Moss is so good, and the Raiders are developing a running game, why do Jordan and Porter have almost 40 receptions each, and Moss only 26. Yeah Moss has had a hamstring injury, but he hasn't done much in Oakland so far. I challenge anyone in the best condition to try to play any sport, let alone football, with a hamstring injury. They dont go away. Now, I am not saying that his injury has caused lack of production but it sure as hell helps. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WHarris1 Posted November 8, 2005 Share Posted November 8, 2005 (edited) QUOTE(SoxFan1 @ Nov 7, 2005 -> 10:44 PM) Uuuum, that isn't much of a difference at all. Take out Moss' worst game and TO's best game and compare. Need I go into the receivers each has played with since 2000 as well? Go for it. Since they have both played with such mediocre WR's since 2000. They both played with legends in the twilight of their career then Moss played with D'Wayne Bates and Nate Burelson while T.O. played with JJ Stokes and Todd Pinkston. If you feel that changed their numbers then go ahead and believe that. Edited November 8, 2005 by WHarris1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SSH2005 Posted November 8, 2005 Share Posted November 8, 2005 I challenge anyone in the best condition to try to play any sport, let alone football, with a hamstring injury. They dont go away. Now, I am not saying that his injury has caused lack of production but it sure as hell helps. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I challenge you to explain why you are right about this and we are all wrong, even when the stats show that TO is more productive than Moss. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoxFan1 Posted November 8, 2005 Share Posted November 8, 2005 Does anyone really think that Oakland is the best situation for Moss anyway? Switch the 2, and I can almost guarantee McNabb/Moss would be better than McNabb and TO. In my eyes, Moss is the better Wr. Thats just my opinion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoxFan1 Posted November 8, 2005 Share Posted November 8, 2005 QUOTE(SSH2005 @ Nov 8, 2005 -> 12:47 AM) I challenge you to explain why you are right about this and we are all wrong, even when the stats show that TO is more productive than Moss. That is just how I feel. When I put it all together, I feel Moss is better than TO. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SSH2005 Posted November 8, 2005 Share Posted November 8, 2005 Does anyone really think that Oakland is the best situation for Moss anyway? Switch the 2, and I can almost guarantee McNabb/Moss would be better than McNabb and TO. In my eyes, Moss is the better Wr. Thats just my opinion. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Backtracking. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mr_genius Posted November 8, 2005 Share Posted November 8, 2005 I also think the Bears should give T.O. a shot. He needs to rehab his image and I would suspect that he might be on his best behavior with the Bears to just prove that the Eagles were the "jerks" and not him. He is a big game breaker and the Bears could really use a player with that type of ability. but then again, TO could end up being a complete disaster Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoxFan1 Posted November 8, 2005 Share Posted November 8, 2005 QUOTE(SSH2005 @ Nov 8, 2005 -> 12:49 AM) Backtracking. Would you like a cookie? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoxFan1 Posted November 8, 2005 Share Posted November 8, 2005 BTW, there is no definite right or wrong, no matter how many people disagree on the issue. I'm backing up my opinion becuase I feel Moss is a better overall receiver than TO. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heads22 Posted November 8, 2005 Share Posted November 8, 2005 QUOTE(SoxFan1 @ Nov 7, 2005 -> 10:42 PM) Nope, sure didnt. What did I miss? Moss not catching anything his way. Also, guys, keep this civil so we don't have to close this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SSH2005 Posted November 8, 2005 Share Posted November 8, 2005 BTW, there is no definite right or wrong, no matter how many people disagree on the issue. I'm backing up my opinion becuase I feel Moss is a better overall receiver than TO. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Would you like a cookie? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.