Felix Posted November 9, 2005 Share Posted November 9, 2005 This is just downright foolish. Kenny deserves this without a doubt, not some hack whose team didnt even make the playoffs, let alone win the World Series. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NorthSideSox72 Posted November 9, 2005 Share Posted November 9, 2005 QUOTE(Tony82087 @ Nov 8, 2005 -> 07:07 PM) Just cause it wasnt it green doesnt mean I wasnt being sarcastic.... I was wondering. Some people have said things almost that ridiculous and meant them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greasywheels121 Posted November 9, 2005 Share Posted November 9, 2005 KW speaks: http://whitesox.mlb.com/NASApp/mlb/news/ar...t=.jsp&c_id=cws The MLB Executive of the Year recipient was announced Monday night at the GM meetings and Indians general manager Mark Shapiro captured the award. "I didn't expect it anyway," Williams said. "Ultimately, all I really cared about, and still care about, is getting Jerry Reinsdorf and the city of Chicago a World Series championship. We have done that. "Now I want to see if we can do it again, and that fire is burning even hotter at this point. Therefore, it doesn't allow me much time to worry about those things. I think my staff is more [upset about it] than I am." He would rather spend his time concentrating on other things -- such as the team. "We'll figure it out," he said. "I am OK Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
witesoxfan Posted November 9, 2005 Share Posted November 9, 2005 QUOTE(greasywheels121 @ Nov 8, 2005 -> 06:20 PM) KW speaks: http://whitesox.mlb.com/NASApp/mlb/news/ar...t=.jsp&c_id=cws Why do I have a feeling KW, deep down inside, really did kind of want this award? He said the PC thing. And what he said was his first goal was what the truth. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whitewashed in '05 Posted November 9, 2005 Share Posted November 9, 2005 KW is the man, never b****es about anything. He knows we all appreciate his efforts. f*** the rest. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flash Tizzle Posted November 9, 2005 Share Posted November 9, 2005 (edited) There should be absolutely no doubt whether Guillen wins Manager of the Year tomorrow. ABSOLUTELY none. Whether you believe Wegde deserved the award due to the Indians late season resurgence is irrelevant. If anything, the White Sox rebounding from their supposed collapse should only reinforce Guillen's grasp on the award. Even before our postseason surge, when votes were likely cast, Guillen deserved recognition. I understand we won the World Series--and that's ultimately all that matters. But Williams missing his well-deserved acolades disappointed me. If Guillen loses, I'll be convinced a contingent of teams were so upset with our success they combined efforts to vote against us. And on that issue--does anyone know if there's any method of disclosing which teams voted for which person? I wouldn't be shocked if Anaheim, Boston, Minnesota, Cleveland, Detroit, Cubs, Houston, Kansas City, Oakland alone voted against Williams. Edited November 9, 2005 by Flash Tizzle Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevin57 Posted November 9, 2005 Share Posted November 9, 2005 My guess is that KW knows that a WS title is much more important than any individual award, but at a gut level, he's probably disappointed. People usually want to be respected and honored by their peers. That said, party on KW. We won! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Ginger Kid Posted November 9, 2005 Author Share Posted November 9, 2005 QUOTE(witesoxfan @ Nov 8, 2005 -> 05:35 PM) Why do I have a feeling KW, deep down inside, really did kind of want this award? He said the PC thing. And what he said was his first goal was what the truth. I'm with you -- he's a competetive guy and who doesn't want praise? What's more, he deserves it!! Oh well, yet another reason to dislike the Indians...as if I had room for anymore. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chitownsportsfan Posted November 9, 2005 Share Posted November 9, 2005 "But the sox team isn't exactly filled with overachievers, who had career yrs. They have plenty of room for improvement, esp offensively." huh? Career Year: Contreras, Buehrle, Garland, Konerko, Politte, AJ... I mean, not everyone had a career year, though they certainly had their share of overachievers, but as you note, the offense can still get much better. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whitewashed in '05 Posted November 9, 2005 Share Posted November 9, 2005 QUOTE(chitownsportsfan @ Nov 8, 2005 -> 09:47 PM) "But the sox team isn't exactly filled with overachievers, who had career yrs. They have plenty of room for improvement, esp offensively." huh? Career Year: Contreras, Buehrle, Garland, Konerko, Politte, AJ... I mean, not everyone had a career year, though they certainly had their share of overachievers, but as you note, the offense can still get much better. I wouldn't call AJ having a career year. He degressed in nearly every offensive catagory except hr's. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YASNY Posted November 9, 2005 Share Posted November 9, 2005 QUOTE(Sox Hustler @ Nov 8, 2005 -> 09:52 PM) I wouldn't call AJ having a career year. He degressed in nearly every offensive catagory except hr's. Nor would I include Buehrle and Konerko in the "career year" catagory. Contreras and Garland are finally doing what has been expected of them for a couple of years. Basically, I don't think this a case of these over performing with little chance of them repeating their siccess. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Felix Posted November 9, 2005 Share Posted November 9, 2005 I'm not sure how this could be considered Konerko's career year when he hit more HR and more RBI last year. Sure, his OPS was slightly higher, but its not like it was a real difference. Someone having a career year would be a 30 year old player who has been in the majors for 8 years and has a career OPS of .700, then finally has a .950 OPS in a year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted November 9, 2005 Share Posted November 9, 2005 QUOTE(chitownsportsfan @ Nov 8, 2005 -> 10:47 PM) "But the sox team isn't exactly filled with overachievers, who had career yrs. They have plenty of room for improvement, esp offensively." huh? Career Year: Contreras, Buehrle, Garland, Konerko, Politte, AJ... I mean, not everyone had a career year, though they certainly had their share of overachievers, but as you note, the offense can still get much better. By that logic, the Indians took a huge step back. There weren't too many career years over there either. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Texsox Posted November 9, 2005 Share Posted November 9, 2005 Two years ago, I thought he should have been fired, so what is my opinion worth? It sucks, I am certain he is unhappy about it. Too bad, it doesn't seem fair. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
santo=dorf Posted November 9, 2005 Share Posted November 9, 2005 I like how the Sox were able to turn Alex Escobar into Jerry Owens, and the best Shapiro could do with him is let him get claimed off of waivers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bmags Posted November 9, 2005 Share Posted November 9, 2005 nobody except garland and contreras had career years...I don't quite understand where you got the rest from. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bjm676 Posted November 9, 2005 Share Posted November 9, 2005 It's over and done with, but still trying to figure out why Shapiro won this. What did he do in the offseason? Sign Millwood? Jose Hernandez? He kept pretty much the same team that he had the previous year. The only thing he really did was lay the groundwork for a POTENTIAL contending team. Everything else is up to the manager. Oh, well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonyho7476 Posted November 9, 2005 Share Posted November 9, 2005 QUOTE(robinventura23 @ Nov 9, 2005 -> 02:35 PM) It's over and done with, but still trying to figure out why Shapiro won this. What did he do in the offseason? Sign Millwood? Jose Hernandez? He kept pretty much the same team that he had the previous year. The only thing he really did was lay the groundwork for a POTENTIAL contending team. Everything else is up to the manager. Oh, well. Exactly, he signed 1 player...Kenny reworked the whole team...THIS YEAR Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whitewashed in '05 Posted November 9, 2005 Share Posted November 9, 2005 (edited) Shapiro signed Millwood. - Great acquisition. Signed Alex Cora. - Ended up trading him to Boston for a prospect I think. Signed Juan Gonzalez. - That worked out GREAT! Traded Gerut for Dubois. - No gain Signed Arthur Rhodes - Good acquisition Am I missing anything else? Oh wait! They signed Jeff Leifer!! Besides these they extended contracts to their own players. How the hell did he earn that more than KW? Now in 04 they signed Wickman, Boone, Betancourt and Peralta but they didn't go anywhere. Edited November 9, 2005 by Sox Hustler Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyyle23 Posted November 9, 2005 Share Posted November 9, 2005 QUOTE(bmags @ Nov 9, 2005 -> 01:00 PM) nobody except garland and contreras had career years...I don't quite understand where you got the rest from. I think Hermanson had a career year until his back injury sidelined him. Politte and Cotts had career years, other than that the team was at or below their career norms Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bmags Posted November 9, 2005 Share Posted November 9, 2005 QUOTE(kyyle23 @ Nov 9, 2005 -> 09:26 PM) I think Hermanson had a career year until his back injury sidelined him. Politte and Cotts had career years, other than that the team was at or below their career norms good call on hermanson, but i'm not really worried with jenks being our closer. cotts and politte yes. Although, hopefully with Cotts, its a sign of things to come. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YASNY Posted November 10, 2005 Share Posted November 10, 2005 QUOTE(bmags @ Nov 9, 2005 -> 04:12 PM) good call on hermanson, but i'm not really worried with jenks being our closer. cotts and politte yes. Although, hopefully with Cotts, its a sign of things to come. Even the call on Hermanson is debatable. He had only previously held the closer's role for part of the season at SF. KW signed him because he's a quality pitcher who also happens to be a versatile pitcher. Signing Hermanson allowed the Sox to have some flexibility with their pitching staff, which was part of the plan. You can say that DH had a career high in saves and be absolutely correct. I look at DH as pitcher that knows how to pitch. His job was to get outs regardless of his role. He had shown that ability in past and continued to so for the Sox. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.