Jump to content

So who is next?


RME JICO

Who will the next Sox acquisition be?  

100 members have voted

  1. 1. Who will the next Sox acquisition be?

    • Juan Pierre
      38
    • Ichiro Suzuki
      5
    • Johnny Damon
      2
    • Bill Mueller
      13
    • Brian Giles
      3
    • Luis Gonzalez
      1
    • Other
      38


Recommended Posts

If that's the case, the fans are defrauded.  Because Anderson makes less than Rowand did last year and Thome makes less than Konerko last year (aggregate of around $4mill).  And the disparity is even greater compared to what Rowand and Konerko will make in 2006.  So that would mean that JR is taking his championship, taking his sold out season tickets, and slashing payroll.

I certainly hope that isn't the case.

 

I look it as Thome Replaces the Thomas/ Everett,which was at 12mil last year.. We are at 7ish

 

we still have to fill Paulie shoes. and have about to 15 mil to do it with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 96
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

We have 5 good starters. We have 5 starters that could, arguably, be the #1 guy on some pitching staff's. We don't need Vasquez to waste our cash by sitting on the bench. Just stop joking around now, and think realistically. Adding Vasquez likely ends any chance of us getting Konerko back, unless JR is willing to bump the payroll up to $95+ million, which I doubt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am sure this won't be a popular thought but hell I will ask it anyway. What if the Sox were to possibly go after Corey Patterson? The kid has tons of talent and has a much better arm than most already being discussed. If they can put him in the 7 or 8 hole and take the pressure off of him maybe he would be able to produce. I'm not saying here, I'm just saying. Thoughts?

 

do you not know any cubs fans? patterson is one of the biggest dissapointments in recent history for the cubs. why in god's name would we pick him up?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(timotime @ Nov 25, 2005 -> 12:01 AM)
do you not know any cubs fans? patterson is one of the biggest dissapointments in recent history for the cubs. why in god's name would we pick him up?

Patterson happens to have tons of talent and speed. He is a decent CF and a above average arm...much better than Pierre. I think Patterson could be one of those "Change of scenery" type guys. With the way the Cubs handle their players is there any wonder how they screwed this guy up? I don't give a f*** all that he plays for the Cubs in the least. Only thing that would concern me about him is the attitude he was showing last season. Ozzie would have his ass though. IMO

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I happen to think that Corey Patterson would be a good gamble for us...

First off his value is perhaps at the lowest that it will ever be...

His defense is light years ahead of Pierre...

We wouldn't have to give up much to get him...

 

Then you have the downside... He would have to be kept toward the bottom of the order... He would have to realize that he's never going to be a sexy Sammy Sosa like power hitter... But his value is so low at this point it would be worth the gamble...

 

Besides that could you imagine if Corey did come to the southside, had a great year, and helped to lead us to the playoffs, it would be a PR nightmare for the Cubs...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(Jeckle2000 @ Nov 25, 2005 -> 08:37 PM)
I happen to think that Corey Patterson would be a good gamble for us...

First off his value is perhaps at the lowest that it will ever be...

His defense is light years ahead of Pierre...

We wouldn't have to give up much to get him...

 

Then you have the downside... He would have to be kept toward the bottom of the order... He would have to realize that he's never going to be a sexy Sammy Sosa like power hitter... But his value is so low at this point it would be worth the gamble...

 

Besides that could you imagine if Corey did come to the southside, had a great year, and helped to lead us to the playoffs, it would be a PR nightmare for the Cubs...

Corey Patterson - .215/.254/.414 (last 3 years 552/111 K/BB ratio)

Juan Pierre - .276/.326/.354 (last 3 years 211/226 K/BB ratio)

 

Good defense alone, doesn't make you a better player.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I still think Arizona is going to have interest in Marte. If they're smart, maybe they'll try to jump in on the Florida fire sale (although who else would you want from their pen), or try to get Mota from Boston.

 

Marte will definitely still have a good market. It's just is there a good enough replacement for him. We can't rely on Cotts to definitely put up the same numbers he did in 2005.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I still think Arizona is going to have interest in Marte. If they're smart, maybe they'll try to jump in on the Florida fire sale (although who else would you want from their pen), or try to get Mota from Boston.

 

Marte will definitely still have a good market. It's just is there a good enough replacement for him. We can't rely on Cotts to definitely put up the same numbers he did in 2005.

Why would Boston trade Mota? Their bullpen was brutal last season. They are keeping him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Patterson happens to have tons of talent and speed. He is a decent CF and a above average arm...much better than Pierre. I think Patterson could be one of those "Change of scenery" type guys. With the way the Cubs handle their players is there any wonder how they screwed this guy up? I don't give a f*** all that he plays for the Cubs in the least. Only thing that would concern me about him is the attitude he was showing last season. Ozzie would have his ass though. IMO

 

patterson is better than pierre? sure...i'll accept that. but both are bad. just to confirm, you seriously think that we should get patterson

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(timotime @ Nov 25, 2005 -> 11:49 AM)
patterson is better than pierre? sure...i'll accept that. but both are bad. just to confirm, you seriously think that we should get patterson

 

Corey Patterson's ability alone makes him worth a look with a team. His cost will never be lower, and who knows if a guy like Ozzie could get through to him. Sometimes all it takes is a change of scenery to wake a guy like this up, and its not like he has washed out with 3 or 4 teams. If you don't pay to much, his potential makes him worth a shot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Corey Patterson's ability alone makes him worth a look with a team.  His cost will never be lower, and who knows if a guy like Ozzie could get through to him.  Sometimes all it takes is a change of scenery to wake a guy like this up, and its not like he has washed out with 3 or 4 teams.  If you don't pay to much, his potential makes him worth a shot.

I would sooner start Chris Young in center field next season and I would be shocked if he wasn't much better than Patterson offensively.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(SSH2005 @ Nov 25, 2005 -> 12:28 PM)
I would sooner start Chris Young in center field next season and I would be shocked if he wasn't much better than Patterson offensively.

From what I hear of Young, he has the same kind of potential as Patterson, the one difference being that Patterson is closer to being at the level today than Young is. It sounds like Young still has some work to do, but no one doubts his potential.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(southsider2k5 @ Nov 25, 2005 -> 11:45 AM)
From what I hear of Young, he has the same kind of potential as Patterson, the one difference being that Patterson is closer to being at the level today than Young is.  It sounds like Young still has some work to do, but no one doubts his potential.

I think Patterson has to loopy of a swing to ever be a successful hitter, but that's jmo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(EvilJester99 @ Nov 25, 2005 -> 09:54 AM)
Isn't that the same thing they say about Crede too?

Crede has a long and loopy swing when he's struggling. When he's hitting right...he's got as sweet of a swing as anyone on our team. September/October...great swing. May...August...he was flying off the ball.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(southsider2k5 @ Nov 25, 2005 -> 11:11 AM)
Corey Patterson's ability alone makes him worth a look with a team.  His cost will never be lower, and who knows if a guy like Ozzie could get through to him.  Sometimes all it takes is a change of scenery to wake a guy like this up, and its not like he has washed out with 3 or 4 teams.  If you don't pay to much, his potential makes him worth a shot.

 

Patterson is, I believe, only 25 years old. It takes awhile sometimes for things to sink in with highly thought of prospects (Derek Lee and Jon Garland jump immediately to mind). For the right price, I wouldnt mind the Sox taking a chance on Patterson.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From what I hear of Young, he has the same kind of potential as Patterson, the one difference being that Patterson is closer to being at the level today than Young is.  It sounds like Young still has some work to do, but no one doubts his potential.

 

then why even acquire patterson if that's the only difference. might as well throw young into the mix and see what happens.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn't mind picking up Patterson as a backup OF. He'd come cheap. It's been something I've thought about for a year. I think the Cubs did just mess him up with wanting him to go up and down in the order so much and never letting him get comfortable in one spot.

 

Crede's old/new swing is short which is why he's a good hitter when he uses it. Before Sept, he used some modified swing that he picked up after his first year of getting to the majors.

 

BTW, I don't know why people keep saying Pierre is a bad player. He's a pretty good player and is above average. Let's get some things straight:

 

1)He's not bad defensively. I don't know where this myth comes from. Is he as good as Anderson or Rowand? No, but in no way does he suck at defense. He's middle of the pack when it comes to the whole league.

 

2)He's a pretty good offensive player who had a bad year. I'd look at his trends, his age and what he can do. That shows me he would be a very good top of the order for years to go and that 2005 was an exception rather than the rule.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...