OilCan Posted December 1, 2005 Share Posted December 1, 2005 Not surprising that the Yankees are trying to sign just about anyone and everyone they can get their hands on, and to throw the green stuff to lure them in. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
timotime Posted December 1, 2005 Share Posted December 1, 2005 Good. I want Marte over his soon to be overpaid ass. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> yes, exactly Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CWSGuy406 Posted December 1, 2005 Share Posted December 1, 2005 QUOTE(Jordan4life_2005 @ Nov 30, 2005 -> 08:20 PM) Pierre is a maybe guy because of one down year, a year in which he still hit a solid .276 and finished second in the NL in stolen bases and triples? And had a .326 OBP. But yeah -- he stole bases. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Felix Posted December 1, 2005 Share Posted December 1, 2005 QUOTE(Jordan4life_2005 @ Nov 30, 2005 -> 03:20 PM) Pierre is a maybe guy because of one down year, a year in which he still hit a solid .276 and finished second in the NL in stolen bases and triples? I think not. Pierre has more than proven himself. Rowand hit .270 last year. Do you think he had a good offensive year? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knightni Posted December 1, 2005 Share Posted December 1, 2005 (edited) Myers would wreak holy hell upon the Oakland A's lefties. Get him if only for that. Edited December 1, 2005 by knightni Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jordan4life_2007 Posted December 1, 2005 Share Posted December 1, 2005 QUOTE(CWSGuy406 @ Nov 30, 2005 -> 09:03 PM) And had a .326 OBP. But yeah -- he stole bases. I know what his OBP was. He obviously had an off year in that department. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jordan4life_2007 Posted December 1, 2005 Share Posted December 1, 2005 QUOTE(Felix @ Nov 30, 2005 -> 09:10 PM) Rowand hit .270 last year. Do you think he had a good offensive year? And the point of this was? I'm not saying Pierre had a great year. Just pointing out it wasn't as bad as some are making it out to be. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ptatc Posted December 1, 2005 Share Posted December 1, 2005 QUOTE(SoxFan101 @ Nov 29, 2005 -> 10:28 PM) Im sick when people say we didnt win with Clee, Maggz, Thomas......thats because our pitching sucked back than... our closer was Koch blowing everything and we never had a 5th starter and Garland was mediocre at best. You throw in the pitching staff for the 2004, 2003, 2002 teams they make the playoffs and possibly win the WS too. I agree. However, with a finite budget back then (it's expanding now) it was proven that a team of sluggers adept at scoringruns with a poor pitching staff couldn't win. It was proven that the money put into the pitching staff insteadof the slugging run producers with a medicore offese can win the world series on a similar budget. That's all I'm saying. We couldn't have both so which one won out? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chisoxfn Posted December 1, 2005 Share Posted December 1, 2005 QUOTE(timotime @ Nov 30, 2005 -> 05:43 PM) yes, exactly Agreed Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
timotime Posted December 2, 2005 Share Posted December 2, 2005 I know what his OBP was. He obviously had an off year in that department. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> you are rationalizing. we dont need pierre, we have anderson. stick with the kid, baby. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.