Texsox Posted December 1, 2005 Share Posted December 1, 2005 http://www.nbc10.com/news/5438681/detail.html PHILADELPHIA -- A junior at the University of Pennsylvania faces punishment from the school for posting photos he took of two naked students who could be seen through a dorm window, according to confidential memos obtained by a student newspaper. Photo Linked Here Basically the couple were easily seen from the street. They seem to be having sex in a window. The student snapped a picture, posted it on his personal web site which is University hosted, and now risks suspension. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hi8is Posted December 1, 2005 Share Posted December 1, 2005 re-f***ING-tarded f*** that university and their codes of honor... if i lived near there i would protest Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DonkeyKongerko Posted December 1, 2005 Share Posted December 1, 2005 I think posting it on his university-hosted website was retarded. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted December 1, 2005 Share Posted December 1, 2005 I don't know...does the "Girls Gone Wild" precedent apply here? That court ruling basically said that anything done in a public setting could be photographed/videotaped and there was no limit on what could be done with it. Is an open window a public setting I guess is the question. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steff Posted December 1, 2005 Share Posted December 1, 2005 QUOTE(Balta1701 @ Dec 1, 2005 -> 11:29 AM) I don't know...does the "Girls Gone Wild" precedent apply here? That court ruling basically said that anything done in a public setting could be photographed/videotaped and there was no limit on what could be done with it. Is an open window a public setting I guess is the question. I think the bigger issue is putting it on college web site..? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted December 1, 2005 Share Posted December 1, 2005 QUOTE(Steff @ Dec 1, 2005 -> 09:31 AM) I think the bigger issue is putting it on college web site..? Well, if the college has rules about pornographic material on university-hosted web sites, then there's no question the kid earned the suspension by violating a clearly spelled out rule (assuming the rule is clearly spelled out somewhere). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steff Posted December 1, 2005 Share Posted December 1, 2005 QUOTE(Balta1701 @ Dec 1, 2005 -> 11:33 AM) Well, if the college has rules about pornographic material on university-hosted web sites, then there's no question the kid earned the suspension by violating a clearly spelled out rule (assuming the rule is clearly spelled out somewhere). I think I'm done with rule/law threads for today.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WilliamTell Posted December 1, 2005 Share Posted December 1, 2005 QUOTE(DonkeyKongerko @ Dec 1, 2005 -> 11:25 AM) I think posting it on his university-hosted website was retarded. Yeah that's what I'm thinking. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.