AddisonStSox Posted December 21, 2005 Share Posted December 21, 2005 QUOTE(SSH2005 @ Dec 20, 2005 -> 11:36 PM) That's why I know I will win. How about the loser is banished from Soxtalk forever? I'm already sick of seeing 300 new threads posted per minute. You'd think you'd fly under the radar. Nope. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SSH2005 Posted December 21, 2005 Share Posted December 21, 2005 How about the loser is banished from Soxtalk forever? I'm already sick of seeing 300 new threads posted per minute. You'd think you'd fly under the radar. Nope. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Wow, I post transaction threads. If you don't like them, don't read them. It's an easy solution to your problem. Okay? Thanks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fathom Posted December 21, 2005 Share Posted December 21, 2005 QUOTE(AddisonStSox @ Dec 21, 2005 -> 02:36 PM) How about the loser is banished from Soxtalk forever? I'm already sick of seeing 300 new threads posted per minute. You'd think you'd fly under the radar. Nope. Maybe it's just me, but I think he's a very solid poster who posts interesting information. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AddisonStSox Posted December 21, 2005 Share Posted December 21, 2005 QUOTE(fathom @ Dec 21, 2005 -> 08:45 AM) Maybe it's just me, but I think he's a very solid poster who posts interesting information. Old habits die hard. Now the twenty threads per hour, tomorrow, the ever-witty derogatory pet-names for those on the Sox roster. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SSH2005 Posted December 21, 2005 Share Posted December 21, 2005 Old habits die hard. Now the twenty threads per hour, tomorrow, the ever-witty derogatory pet-names for those on the Sox roster. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I think you need some thicker skin if those things bother you. Do some extra threads in The Hotstove forum really ruin your day? Aren't transaction threads what that forum is for? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest JimH Posted December 21, 2005 Share Posted December 21, 2005 This thread is actually humorous, but I will say this for Jabroni/SSH, he is trying very hard to be non confrontational and is letting all the little potshots roll off his back. He has already admitted he is Jabroni reincarnated, so I would say it's fair to let bygones be bygones and let him be. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AddisonStSox Posted December 21, 2005 Share Posted December 21, 2005 QUOTE(JimH @ Dec 21, 2005 -> 08:51 AM) This thread is actually humorous, but I will say this for Jabroni/SSH, he is trying very hard to be non confrontational and is letting all the little potshots roll off his back. He has already admitted he is Jabroni reincarnated, so I would say it's fair to let bygones be bygones and let him be. I suppose...not my call anyway. Bah Humbug Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SSH2005 Posted December 21, 2005 Share Posted December 21, 2005 I suppose...not my call anyway. Bah Humbug <{POST_SNAPBACK}> By the way, I'm not the one who invented the "OMIT TIMO" slogan. Other posters have made up nicknames for Sox players as well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fathom Posted December 21, 2005 Share Posted December 21, 2005 QUOTE(SSH2005 @ Dec 21, 2005 -> 02:54 PM) By the way, I'm not the one who invented the "OMIT TIMO" slogan. Other posters have made up nicknames for Sox players as well. Hey, that was me! That's it, I take back the compliment from a few minutes ago. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SSH2005 Posted December 21, 2005 Share Posted December 21, 2005 Hey, that was me! That's it, I take back the compliment from a few minutes ago. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> It was far too witty for me to think up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest JimH Posted December 21, 2005 Share Posted December 21, 2005 Ian did you see the list of non tenders? Lots of bullpen guys, and lots of 4th OF types. I don't think they'll have any problem bringing in depth. They always announce a bunch of these signings in January. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SSH2005 Posted December 21, 2005 Share Posted December 21, 2005 (edited) Ian did you see the list of non tenders? Lots of bullpen guys, and lots of 4th OF types. I don't think they'll have any problem bringing in depth. They always announce a bunch of these signings in January. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> What do you think of Chad Bradford? I would really like to add him. Edited December 21, 2005 by SSH2005 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AddisonStSox Posted December 21, 2005 Share Posted December 21, 2005 QUOTE(JimH @ Dec 21, 2005 -> 08:56 AM) Ian did you see the list of non tenders? Lots of bullpen guys, and lots of 4th OF types. I don't think they'll have any problem bringing in depth. They always announce a bunch of these signings in January. Sure did. Lot's of interesting names popping up...as a certain somebody I know predicted. Check your PMs a little later. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fathom Posted December 21, 2005 Share Posted December 21, 2005 BTW, the Sox have supposedly talked to the Rangers, Dodgers, and Padres about Garland. I guess it's time for a 20 page thread about possible Padres trades. Cue VaFan and Brian Giles. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest JimH Posted December 21, 2005 Share Posted December 21, 2005 Cue VaFan and Brian Giles. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Can we not? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SSH2005 Posted December 21, 2005 Share Posted December 21, 2005 You have to admire his love for Giles though. He posts stats I've never even heard of to show how good Giles is. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fathom Posted December 21, 2005 Share Posted December 21, 2005 QUOTE(SSH2005 @ Dec 21, 2005 -> 03:01 PM) You have to admire his love for Giles though. He posts stats I've never even heard of to show how good Giles is. I honestly think I've stopped reading stats on this site. Every stat seems as a way for a poster to push his belief onto others. Sometimes, it's better to not use stats as analyzing a player, and just trust what you see with your own eyes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YASNY Posted December 21, 2005 Share Posted December 21, 2005 QUOTE(fathom @ Dec 21, 2005 -> 09:02 AM) I honestly think I've stopped reading stats on this site. Every stat seems as a way for a poster to push his belief onto others. Sometimes, it's better to not use stats as analyzing a player, and just trust what you see with your own eyes. 74.6% of scouts and GM's feel stats are overrated. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.