NUKE_CLEVELAND Posted December 22, 2005 Author Share Posted December 22, 2005 QUOTE(mr_genius @ Dec 21, 2005 -> 06:06 PM) I think Iraq has the right to try him in Iraq. If they want they can send it off to some 'international' court in Europe. Or maybe just give him a seat on the UN human rights council. lol Yeah. Hed fit right in with Syria, Cuba, Lybia and all those other "shining examples" who currently sit on there. What a joke. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mr_genius Posted December 22, 2005 Share Posted December 22, 2005 QUOTE(NorthSideSox72 @ Dec 21, 2005 -> 06:30 PM) Wow. Nice sweeping judgement. And totally inaccurate. Many of those countries HAVE those governments, but even in places like Iran, the majority of people in the country scratch and claw for western freedoms of all kinds. Its really pretty sad that some people (like you, apparently) think that everyone from the Middle East is a radical fundamentalist maniac. Hey, if Iraq doesn't elect a theocracy I will gladly admit that I was wrong. And of course everyone in the middle east isn't a fundamentalist, maybe the majority of them are but not all. Once again... prove me wrong middle east, prove me wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NorthSideSox72 Posted December 22, 2005 Share Posted December 22, 2005 QUOTE(mr_genius @ Dec 21, 2005 -> 07:33 PM) Hey, if Iraq doesn't elect a theocracy I will gladly admit that I was wrong. And of course everyone in the middle east isn't a fundamentalist, maybe the majority of them are but not all. Once again... prove me wrong middle east, prove me wrong. Actually, the Islamic religion reminds me a lot of the Catholic faith, only more amplified and a few centuries behind. A minority of highly influential individuals pull the group towards the most fundamental extent of the belief system, while the body of the believers pull towards something more moderate. Except, at this point, the Catholic Church doesn't run any countries. And they've calmed down a bit in recent centuries. Before people chastise my analogy, I am in fact a confirmed (and recovering) Catholic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chisoxfn Posted December 22, 2005 Share Posted December 22, 2005 QUOTE(NUKE_CLEVELAND @ Dec 21, 2005 -> 09:14 AM) http://www.cnn.com/2005/WORLD/meast/12/21/...rial/index.html I laughed for 10 minutes straight after reading this. I strongly doubt this is true but even if it is does anyone really give a s***? Thats the thing, he deserves to be beaten. I could give two s***s if he cries a foul. Regardless i doubt its true and I hope we didn't do it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted December 22, 2005 Share Posted December 22, 2005 QUOTE(mr_genius @ Dec 21, 2005 -> 04:27 PM) If I had to wager, which I often do, I would place a large amount of money on any elected Iraqi government having the trial in Iraq and executing him. I would fully agree with you, but I think that is a simplistic view of the situation. Why? Because the "elected Iraqi government" is composed almost entirely of religious Shi'ite muslims. Given their relationship with the Sunni population of Iraq, of course the elected government wants to get their hands on him, for the same reason this nation wants to get its hands on Osama. (Or at least why we wanted to for those few months in 2001-2002 when he was still our priority). If you polled the Sunni population however, I bet you'd find overwhelming support for his trial happening in front of an international court. Ditto the sunnis in Saudi Arabia, etc. On the other hand, I'll bet the Shi'a in Iran would like the Shi'a in Iraq to take care of him. Etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BHAMBARONS Posted December 22, 2005 Share Posted December 22, 2005 To hear Hussein complain about civil rights violations is like the Yanks complaining that the D-Rays have to large of a payroll Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mercy! Posted December 22, 2005 Share Posted December 22, 2005 Thats the thing, he deserves to be beaten. I could give two s***s if he cries a foul. Regardless i doubt its true and I hope we didn't do it. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Assuming you believe in democracy, he deserves to be tried first and administered just punishment afterward. Somewhere in the world, there are people who think you should be beheaded simply because of who and what your are (or aren't). That's why we're better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kapkomet Posted December 22, 2005 Share Posted December 22, 2005 QUOTE(Mercy! @ Dec 22, 2005 -> 07:54 PM) Assuming you believe in democracy, he deserves to be tried first and administered just punishment afterward. Somewhere in the world, there are people who think you should be beheaded simply because of who and what your are (or aren't). That's why we're better. Holy s***... the world is coming to an end, apparantly. That's two posts in a row I agree with Mercy. /faints Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mercy! Posted December 22, 2005 Share Posted December 22, 2005 Holy s***... the world is coming to an end, apparantly. That's two posts in a row I agree with Mercy. /faints <{POST_SNAPBACK}> YEAH BABY! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kapkomet Posted December 22, 2005 Share Posted December 22, 2005 QUOTE(Mercy! @ Dec 22, 2005 -> 07:58 PM) YEAH BABY! My, my... what's this world coming to? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mercy! Posted December 22, 2005 Share Posted December 22, 2005 My, my... what's this world coming to? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Well, just don't tell Tex. Then I'd have to start sending the photos to you instead of to him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kapkomet Posted December 22, 2005 Share Posted December 22, 2005 QUOTE(Mercy! @ Dec 22, 2005 -> 08:17 PM) Well, just don't tell Tex. Then I'd have to start sending the photos to you instead of to him. You could send them to both of us... (and forget to send them to Tex, mysteriously...) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted December 22, 2005 Share Posted December 22, 2005 The Iraqi judge in the Saddam case says there is "no evidence" to support these allegations. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4551656.stm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kapkomet Posted December 22, 2005 Share Posted December 22, 2005 QUOTE(southsider2k5 @ Dec 22, 2005 -> 09:40 PM) The Iraqi judge in the Saddam case says there is "no evidence" to support these allegations. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4551656.stm He's lying. We torture everyone in our captivity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mreye Posted December 23, 2005 Share Posted December 23, 2005 QUOTE(southsider2k5 @ Dec 22, 2005 -> 03:40 PM) The Iraqi judge in the Saddam case says there is "no evidence" to support these allegations. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4551656.stm Why the f*** should that matter? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoCalSouthSider59 Posted December 24, 2005 Share Posted December 24, 2005 QUOTE(NUKE_CLEVELAND @ Dec 21, 2005 -> 10:14 AM) http://www.cnn.com/2005/WORLD/meast/12/21/...rial/index.html I laughed for 10 minutes straight after reading this. I strongly doubt this is true but even if it is does anyone really give a s***? So did i, what a f***in' idiot, Saddam Hussein.......... :finger Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NUKE_CLEVELAND Posted December 24, 2005 Author Share Posted December 24, 2005 Now that it's clear, based on evidence, that we haven't beaten and tortured Hussein my question becomes............. "Why not?!?" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
timotime Posted December 27, 2005 Share Posted December 27, 2005 I thought we were in Iraq to set up a democracy. Democracy isn't about beating and torturing prisoners of war (which I am not claiming happened in this case). So if it's cool for us to do things like this then we seem like hypocrites in Iraq where we expect them to set up a civilized democracy. You claim to be anti-communist (in your avatar) but you are all for Communist tactics. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> we are setting up a democracy- it has been set up. we should let the iraqi gov't do whatever it wants now. we arent torturing saddam, the iraqi government is, and they should, too, because that piece of s*** deserves it. liberals are always complaining about us running that country when the iraqis should be, like it is a puppet gov't. and now you want us to step into this trial? you cant have it both ways, man, make a choice. dont b**** unless you have a solution. let me go out on a limb- you're solution has three phases: 1. cut 2. run 3. place tail between legs for all the world to see Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
timotime Posted December 27, 2005 Share Posted December 27, 2005 The Iraqi judge in the Saddam case says there is "no evidence" to support these allegations. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4551656.stm <{POST_SNAPBACK}> i know, saddam hasnt wiped out kurds in the north or anything? that testimony that was in the news from multiple people who had family members killed in front of them? it was all lies and it was all false. no evidence whatsoever! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts