southsider2k5 Posted December 22, 2005 Share Posted December 22, 2005 http://apnews.myway.com/article/20051222/D8EL0PG0K.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kapkomet Posted December 22, 2005 Share Posted December 22, 2005 What's messed up about this whole thing for all you Bush haters out there re: the Patriot Act. The law originated after the Oklahoma City bombing and was originally signed into law by one President Clinton. So, it was ok then, but now that EVILLLLLLLLLL George W. Bush is in the White House, he's pissing all over the constituion. Furthermore, how often is this even used? Not very often. In fact, almost zero - but it's there in case it's needed, or to scream bloody f***ing murder that our president is nothing but a power grabbing douchebag. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mercy! Posted December 22, 2005 Share Posted December 22, 2005 ... our president is nothing but a power grabbing douchebag. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Won't you please watch your feminizing language about our Penis-in-Chief. Let's show a little respect around here, okay? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted December 22, 2005 Share Posted December 22, 2005 Wow....just....wow. From MSNBC six days ago: Mr Bush, in an effort to force passage of the bill, warned on Friday he would veto any temporary extension of the [Patriot] act. From AP today: (White House-AP) December 22, 2005 - The White House is hailing the Senate's vote to extend the Patriot Act for six months, a day after vowing President Bush wouldn't accept a short-term extension. Press Secretary Scott McClellan calls Wednesday night's Senate vote "an important victory for the American people." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kapkomet Posted December 22, 2005 Share Posted December 22, 2005 QUOTE(Balta1701 @ Dec 22, 2005 -> 09:27 PM) Wow....just....wow. Yea, because he was told that they would kill it. What would you do? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted December 22, 2005 Share Posted December 22, 2005 QUOTE(kapkomet @ Dec 22, 2005 -> 01:44 PM) Yea, because he was told that they would kill it. What would you do? Let's ask a different question...what was the variety of shoes commonly thrown at Mr. Bush's opponent during the 2004 election? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kapkomet Posted December 22, 2005 Share Posted December 22, 2005 QUOTE(Balta1701 @ Dec 22, 2005 -> 09:47 PM) Let's ask a different question...what was the variety of shoes commonly thrown at Mr. Bush's opponent during the 2004 election? Since you're one for "details" - the threat of the veto was on a 3 month extension. This one is six. So, no veto necessary. And yes, this answer is as lame as some of yours. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jasonxctf Posted December 22, 2005 Share Posted December 22, 2005 only extended 1 month Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted December 22, 2005 Share Posted December 22, 2005 QUOTE(jasonxctf @ Dec 22, 2005 -> 02:42 PM) only extended 1 month Assuming the same version can get through the Senate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted December 23, 2005 Author Share Posted December 23, 2005 QUOTE(Balta1701 @ Dec 22, 2005 -> 04:47 PM) Let's ask a different question...what was the variety of shoes commonly thrown at Mr. Bush's opponent during the 2004 election? And what is one of the biggest b****es about this administration? That they don't compromise and try to do everything their way. Now they compromise and people complain. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted December 23, 2005 Share Posted December 23, 2005 QUOTE(southsider2k5 @ Dec 23, 2005 -> 05:00 AM) And what is one of the biggest b****es about this administration? That they don't compromise and try to do everything their way. Now they compromise and people complain. When a Republican flip-flops, it's a compromise. When a Democrat compromises, it's a flip-flop. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FlaSoxxJim Posted December 23, 2005 Share Posted December 23, 2005 QUOTE(Balta1701 @ Dec 23, 2005 -> 10:53 AM) When a Republican flip-flops, it's a compromise. When a Democrat compromises, it's a flip-flop. That's correct. NOW GET BACK IN LINE! Sen. Feingold has shed light on what the House 5-week Patriot Act extension really amounts to, and he vows that the bipartison coalition will not allow the GOP to ram the Conference Report through as it currently stands in its flawed form: Late today the House agreed to a 5 week extension of the Patriot Act and it looks like the President and Senate will agree as well. I have no problem with this shorter extension - it actually brings us closer to the 3 month extension many on our side had argued for. With a shorter extension, the overly broad parts of the current Patriot Act, will be in effect for less time, and as many have pointed out here today, that would be a good thing. However, the House Republican leadership and the President should not make the mistake of thinking that a shorter extension will make it possible to jam the unacceptable conference report through the Congress. I will fight against that as hard in January as I did in November and December - And our bipartisan coalition has come too far, and survived too many attacks, not to hang together. It's time to get serious about passing a bill that protects our rights and freedoms while also combatting terrorism. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts