Balta1701 Posted January 3, 2006 Share Posted January 3, 2006 The Pack had an insane amount of injuries this year...3 running backs on IR, like 5-6 different starting running backs all year, Walker on IR...the Pack have a better team than the one we saw on the field all year. If they were to bring back people healthy, then just starting off with Green, Gado, and Davenport all in their backfield, and Driver and Walker at Wideout, they have a decent offensive nucleus to work with. The fact that they have so many good potential running backs could work to mask weakness on their offensive line. I think they may even be in good position if they need to play Rogers next year, just because they have so many decent RB's. They do need O Line help, but how many bad teams don't? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RME JICO Posted January 3, 2006 Share Posted January 3, 2006 (edited) With Sherman being fired, it is hard to see the Packers front office keeping Favre around when they are trying to rebuild and get younger. Will Brett really want to learn a new offense this late in his career? I thought Favre treated the whole Rodgers thing poorly for a veteran QB. Instead of taking the guy under his wing, Favre seemed to be offended that the Packers drafted him. Then he controlled when he would come out of the game, and not the coach? There was no reason why Rodgers couldn't have gotten more reps than he did this year with how bad the Pack played. A large part to the Packers problem this year was Brett's interceptions. He almost averaged 2 per game. It is hard to win when you turn the ball over that much. The Packers are not going to be any better next year with Favre at QB, so they might as well bring in Rodgers. Edited January 3, 2006 by RME JICO Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mr_genius Posted January 3, 2006 Share Posted January 3, 2006 QUOTE(Heads22 @ Jan 3, 2006 -> 01:20 PM) No, I censored you calling him a homo. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heads22 Posted January 4, 2006 Share Posted January 4, 2006 QUOTE(mr_genius @ Jan 3, 2006 -> 05:55 PM) Yeah, cause removing the stuff certainly isn't our policy or anything.... :rolly Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DABearSoX Posted January 4, 2006 Share Posted January 4, 2006 I have the utmost respect for this guy, but I am a bears fan...i never want to see farve in pads again. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BobDylan Posted January 4, 2006 Share Posted January 4, 2006 QUOTE(Milkman delivers @ Jan 2, 2006 -> 04:03 PM) Just go away and stop tarnishing your legacy. This year sucked and his performance in the playoffs the last couple years was pretty embarrassing. Who cares about a legacy when you love the game? Haven't you ever played on a terrible, awful, s*** team and still love it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RockRaines Posted January 4, 2006 Share Posted January 4, 2006 QUOTE(Heads22 @ Jan 3, 2006 -> 06:06 PM) Yeah, cause removing the stuff certainly isn't our policy or anything.... :rolly bring the search function back to see how many times "homo" got censored. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YASNY Posted January 4, 2006 Share Posted January 4, 2006 QUOTE(RockRaines @ Jan 3, 2006 -> 11:32 PM) bring the search function back to see how many times "homo" got censored. Stop arguing. It's against the rules and it will stay that way. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.