southsider2k5 Posted January 6, 2006 Share Posted January 6, 2006 http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/nation/3564937.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NUKE_CLEVELAND Posted January 6, 2006 Share Posted January 6, 2006 B.B.B.B.B.B.B.B.UT HES AN EVIL REACTIONARY PIG!!! HE CANT BE ON THE COURT!!!! NOMINATE JESSE JACKSON!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mreye Posted January 6, 2006 Share Posted January 6, 2006 http://www.nationalreview.com/lowry/lowry200601060713.asp Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rex Kickass Posted January 6, 2006 Share Posted January 6, 2006 Just because he's well qualified doesn't mean he's the right person for the job. The Democrats aren't planning a filibuster at this point from everything I've read. But they are going to have a vigorous hearing. So we'll see what happens. Personally, I think its the President's perogative to nominate who he wants. Unfortunately, we elected someone who nominates people that I disagree with. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NUKE_CLEVELAND Posted January 6, 2006 Share Posted January 6, 2006 QUOTE(Rex Kickass @ Jan 6, 2006 -> 02:58 PM) So we'll see what happens. Personally, I think its the President's perogative to nominate who he wants. Unfortunately, we elected someone who nominates people that I disagree with. Unfortunately is in the eye of the beholder. I couldn't be happier. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heads22 Posted January 6, 2006 Share Posted January 6, 2006 I'd have been MUCH happier with another person along the Roberts mold. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts