juddling Posted January 10, 2006 Share Posted January 10, 2006 interesting documentary Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knightni Posted January 10, 2006 Share Posted January 10, 2006 No way. That's not her. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LosMediasBlancas Posted January 10, 2006 Share Posted January 10, 2006 She is supposed to be 39 in that before picture? No way. She is probably 29 in the before picture. But I do believe she'd look as bad as the 'after' picture (at 39) if she was partying like they claim. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mreye Posted January 10, 2006 Share Posted January 10, 2006 A month later? No frickin' way! 10 years, ok. Not a month! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NorthSideSox72 Posted January 10, 2006 Share Posted January 10, 2006 I call B.S. on this article. I'm not even convinced those are the same woman. And no way that happens in a month. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rex Kickass Posted January 11, 2006 Share Posted January 11, 2006 Imagine if she did that AND ate nothing but McDonalds. Hello casket! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WilliamTell Posted January 11, 2006 Share Posted January 11, 2006 I'm guessing that's not her either. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sayitaintso Posted January 11, 2006 Share Posted January 11, 2006 That can't be her a month later, she had some terrible ageing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.