Steve Bartman's my idol Posted January 26, 2006 Share Posted January 26, 2006 At least you finally admitted it. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Why don't you just agree to meet me downtown, bring $1,000.00 (your life savings), and lets do this already. I'm sick of your posturing and your lack of willingness to back up your claims. You are losing all credibility when you try to slander me, and don't have the backbone to face me. Steff has more balls than you and she's a woman (a hot one, so I hear!). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RockRaines Posted January 26, 2006 Share Posted January 26, 2006 QUOTE(mr_genius @ Jan 26, 2006 -> 11:40 AM) Clemens, Pettite? yes. Going forward or the last 5 years? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YASNY Posted January 26, 2006 Share Posted January 26, 2006 QUOTE(Felix @ Jan 26, 2006 -> 11:40 AM) A .936 OPS is pretty good.. Yes. He had one good post season, after a few horrid ones. He wasn't exactly Mr. Clutch with the Pirates. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Critic Posted January 26, 2006 Share Posted January 26, 2006 This thread is fantastic and awful at the same time. There are like 7 arguments going on, none of which make any sense. And one Herman's Hermits reference, from out of nowhere. And before you even start, I don't want to bet anyone about anything!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Bartman's my idol Posted January 26, 2006 Share Posted January 26, 2006 Would you consider him better than johan Santana, Roy Halladay, Jake Peavy, Roger Clemens, Andy pettite? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> BTW...Clemens, Pettitte and Peavy are in the NL! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyyle23 Posted January 26, 2006 Share Posted January 26, 2006 QUOTE(The Critic @ Jan 26, 2006 -> 12:42 PM) This thread is fantastic and awful at the same time. There are like 7 arguments going on, none of which make any sense. And one Herman's Hermits reference, from out of nowhere. And before you even start, I don't want to bet anyone about anything!!! LOL, Kid Gleason was cracking me up too. This thread is like a person with multiple personalities going at it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mr_genius Posted January 26, 2006 Share Posted January 26, 2006 QUOTE(RockRaines @ Jan 26, 2006 -> 11:42 AM) Going forward or the last 5 years? current and forward. lol, no way I am saying Buehrle is any where near Clemens in past years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kalapse Posted January 26, 2006 Share Posted January 26, 2006 QUOTE(mr_genius @ Jan 26, 2006 -> 11:40 AM) Santana, Halladay? no Clemens, Pettite? yes. Santana, Halladay? yes. Clemens? possibly Pettite? not for long Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Bartman's my idol Posted January 26, 2006 Share Posted January 26, 2006 current and forward. lol, no way I am saying Buehrle is any where near Clemens in past years. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> That's what I said! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyyle23 Posted January 26, 2006 Share Posted January 26, 2006 QUOTE(Steve Bartman's my idol @ Jan 26, 2006 -> 12:43 PM) BTW...Clemens, Pettitte and Peavy are in the NL! so what, they were in the quote that contained all the pitchers that you said Mark Buehrle was better than. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RockRaines Posted January 26, 2006 Share Posted January 26, 2006 QUOTE(Steve Bartman's my idol @ Jan 26, 2006 -> 11:43 AM) BTW...Clemens, Pettitte and Peavy are in the NL! O RLY? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kalapse Posted January 26, 2006 Share Posted January 26, 2006 QUOTE(Steve Bartman's my idol @ Jan 26, 2006 -> 11:43 AM) BTW...Clemens, Pettitte and Peavy are in the NL! Point being? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kid Gleason Posted January 26, 2006 Share Posted January 26, 2006 QUOTE(The Critic @ Jan 26, 2006 -> 11:42 AM) This thread is fantastic and awful at the same time. There are like 7 arguments going on, none of which make any sense. And one Herman's Hermits reference, from out of nowhere. And before you even start, I don't want to bet anyone about anything!!! Collect a penny for everytime you see "no one" spelt "noone" on the 'net, and within an hour you will be a rich man. People have been trying to turn the Peter Noone reply into the new Spam, kind of. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Felix Posted January 26, 2006 Share Posted January 26, 2006 Throwing exclamation points at the end of posts make you look smart! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Critic Posted January 26, 2006 Share Posted January 26, 2006 I don't want New Spam or New Coke. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RockRaines Posted January 26, 2006 Share Posted January 26, 2006 QUOTE(mr_genius @ Jan 26, 2006 -> 11:44 AM) current and forward. lol, no way I am saying Buehrle is any where near Clemens in past years. Well the argument was that Mark was better than those guys, including some other Cy Young winners. Then it went to that Mark was better than them because they only had 1 or 2 good years. Then it was Mark is the better pitcher in the playoffs. Then it was ERA doesnt matter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyyle23 Posted January 26, 2006 Share Posted January 26, 2006 QUOTE(Kid Gleason @ Jan 26, 2006 -> 12:45 PM) Collect a penny for everytime you see "no one" spelt "noone" on the 'net, and within an hour you will be a rich man. People have been trying to turn the Peter Noone reply into the new Spam, kind of. Ok Mr Spellcheck, dont you have a Sci Fi Film Festival to attend? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mr_genius Posted January 26, 2006 Share Posted January 26, 2006 QUOTE(Kalapse @ Jan 26, 2006 -> 11:44 AM) Santana, Halladay? yes. he asked if Buehrle was better Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kalapse Posted January 26, 2006 Share Posted January 26, 2006 QUOTE(RockRaines @ Jan 26, 2006 -> 11:46 AM) Well the argument was that Mark was better than those guys, including some other Cy Young winners. Then it went to that Mark was better than them because they only had 1 or 2 good years. Then it was Mark is the better pitcher in the playoffs. Then it was ERA doesnt matter. Wins and intangibles are all that matters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kalapse Posted January 26, 2006 Share Posted January 26, 2006 QUOTE(mr_genius @ Jan 26, 2006 -> 11:46 AM) he asked if Buehrle was better duh. pay no attention. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RockRaines Posted January 26, 2006 Share Posted January 26, 2006 QUOTE(Steve Bartman's my idol @ Jan 25, 2006 -> 01:29 PM) Buehrle is better than ANY one of the above mentioned pitchers. This was what was claimed, and this was the pitchers that were being spoken about. The Pitchers I was comparing him to were Carpenter, Prior or Zambrano, Clemens (if he comes back) or Andy P, Jake Peavy, Pedro, Smoltz, Dontrelle, Halladay, Randy Johnson, Rich Harden or Barry Zito, Johan Santana. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Bartman's my idol Posted January 26, 2006 Share Posted January 26, 2006 Point being? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> The question was asked whether Buehrle was in the top 5-7 pitchers in the AL? When someone said he was, then (professor) rock asked if he was better than Pettitte, Clemen, Peavy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YASNY Posted January 26, 2006 Share Posted January 26, 2006 QUOTE(RockRaines @ Jan 26, 2006 -> 11:46 AM) Well the argument was that Mark was better than those guys, including some other Cy Young winners. Then it went to that Mark was better than them because they only had 1 or 2 good years. Then it was Mark is the better pitcher in the playoffs. Then it was ERA doesnt matter. How in the hell can you keep up with where the argument has gone? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kalapse Posted January 26, 2006 Share Posted January 26, 2006 QUOTE(Steve Bartman's my idol @ Jan 26, 2006 -> 11:47 AM) The question was asked whether Buehrle was in the top 5-7 pitchers in the AL? When someone said he was, then (professor) rock asked if he was better than Pettitte, Clemen, Peavy. It's impossible to keep track of who is responding to what. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted January 26, 2006 Share Posted January 26, 2006 All right guys, as funny as this has been, it needs to stop. Its been the same people over and over again, and it is killing theads. Once it is funny... more than once it is become a pattern and must end now. I don't want to see you guys in an arguement again, please. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts