KipWellsFan Posted February 1, 2006 Share Posted February 1, 2006 lol "Antiwar activist Cindy Sheehan -- who was invited to attend President Bush's State of the Union speech -- has been arrested, Capitol police say." cnn.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flash Tizzle Posted February 1, 2006 Share Posted February 1, 2006 You're right. That's funny. Don't know why he even bothered to invite her, though. Let's use this as the official State of the Union thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NUKE_CLEVELAND Posted February 1, 2006 Share Posted February 1, 2006 Bush didnt invite her obviously. According to Fox News some congresswoman invited her. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flash Tizzle Posted February 1, 2006 Share Posted February 1, 2006 QUOTE(NUKE_CLEVELAND @ Jan 31, 2006 -> 08:06 PM) Bush didnt invite her obviously. According to Fox News some congresswoman invited her. Typo on my behalf. Meant don't know why 'they' bothered to invite her. She wasn't going to be allowed in the room during his speech. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NUKE_CLEVELAND Posted February 1, 2006 Share Posted February 1, 2006 QUOTE(Flash Tizzle @ Jan 31, 2006 -> 08:09 PM) Typo on my behalf. Meant don't know why 'they' bothered to invite her. She wasn't going to be allowed in the room during his speech. Yeah, Uber-Attention whore strikes yet again. :rolly Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Texsox Posted February 1, 2006 Share Posted February 1, 2006 idiot. She was arrested as part of a group. It really pains me when extremists try to hijack the party. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flash Tizzle Posted February 1, 2006 Share Posted February 1, 2006 (edited) "We will act boldly in freedom's cause." Democrats wet themselves. I noticed prior to this statement he mentioned democratic elected governments respecting their neighbors. If that's not a subtle dig at Hamas I don't know what is. Edited February 1, 2006 by Flash Tizzle Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NUKE_CLEVELAND Posted February 1, 2006 Share Posted February 1, 2006 "If there are people in America talking to Al Quada we want to know about it. We will not sit back and wait to be hit again!" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flash Tizzle Posted February 1, 2006 Share Posted February 1, 2006 Very strong words for Iran earlier. George heightened his tone noticeably on the issue. Somehow, you get the impression economic sanctions against Iran aren't very practical in Dubya's mind. New documents released by the IAEA earlier this afternoon should dispell any doubt of Iran's intentions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigSqwert Posted February 1, 2006 Share Posted February 1, 2006 QUOTE(NUKE_CLEVELAND @ Jan 31, 2006 -> 09:36 PM) "If there are people in America talking to Al Quada we want to know about it. We will not sit back and wait to be hit again!" I have yet to hear a Dem disagree. It's the sidestepping of the law we have a problem with. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rex Kickass Posted February 1, 2006 Share Posted February 1, 2006 I got back in time to hear the last sentence. Oh well... I prefer reading it, takes less time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KipWellsFan Posted February 1, 2006 Author Share Posted February 1, 2006 No expert here, but it seemed like a hell of a speech. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rex Kickass Posted February 1, 2006 Share Posted February 1, 2006 And now its time for the 40th Annual response by the opposing party. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsideirish71 Posted February 1, 2006 Share Posted February 1, 2006 Cindy Sheehan is so off the map, she wants to run against Diane Finestein who is as liberal as hell, because she first supported the war. When you are too liberal for the California branch of the democratic party, you need to check your sanity at the door. The goof who invited her needs to get her invite privileges taken away. Did she really think that Cindy would behave. I am glad that Cindy was stupid enough to try and open that banner ahead of time, if she was a bit more with it she would of waited to pull her attention grabing scheme during the address. They should just issue a restraining order and keep her away. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NUKE_CLEVELAND Posted February 1, 2006 Share Posted February 1, 2006 QUOTE(southsideirish71 @ Jan 31, 2006 -> 09:13 PM) Cindy Sheehan is so off the map, she wants to run against Diane Finestein who is as liberal as hell, because she first supported the war. When you are too liberal for the California branch of the democratic party, you need to check your sanity at the door. The goof who invited her needs to get her invite privileges taken away. Did she really think that Cindy would behave. I am glad that Cindy was stupid enough to try and open that banner ahead of time, if she was a bit more with it she would of waited to pull her attention grabing scheme during the address. They should just issue a restraining order and keep her away. The congresswoman who invited her is a real winner in her own right. One of those left coast radicals who advocates a "department of peace". LOL! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsideirish71 Posted February 1, 2006 Share Posted February 1, 2006 QUOTE(NUKE_CLEVELAND @ Jan 31, 2006 -> 09:14 PM) The congresswoman who invited her is a real winner in her own right. One of those left coast radicals who advocates a "department of peace". LOL! Make she can meet with Chirac and work towards the French model with the Department of Surrender. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NUKE_CLEVELAND Posted February 1, 2006 Share Posted February 1, 2006 QUOTE(southsideirish71 @ Jan 31, 2006 -> 09:15 PM) Make she can meet with Chirac and work towards the French model with the Department of Surrender. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rex Kickass Posted February 1, 2006 Share Posted February 1, 2006 Tim Kaine is good. The Bush speech is pretty solid too (I'm on page three) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NUKE_CLEVELAND Posted February 1, 2006 Share Posted February 1, 2006 Oh this is soooooooooo typical of them. Bush sucks..........Bush sucks........Bush sucks........ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rex Kickass Posted February 1, 2006 Share Posted February 1, 2006 You aren't even listening. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Texsox Posted February 1, 2006 Share Posted February 1, 2006 QUOTE(NUKE_CLEVELAND @ Jan 31, 2006 -> 09:19 PM) Oh this is soooooooooo typical of them. Bush sucks..........Bush sucks........Bush sucks........ That is soooooooooo typical of the "out party". The GOP tossed a lot of mud at Clinton, in case you forgot. The business of politics isn't much different from either party. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NUKE_CLEVELAND Posted February 1, 2006 Share Posted February 1, 2006 There's a better way...........theres a better way........... Socialism and defeatism are not them however........try again dude. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NUKE_CLEVELAND Posted February 1, 2006 Share Posted February 1, 2006 How can this guy keep a straight face saying Democrats are trying to help get rid of partisanship and rancor in Washington when just yesterday Kennedy and Kerry were screaming for a filibuster for Sam Alito. LOL! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsideirish71 Posted February 1, 2006 Share Posted February 1, 2006 There is a better way. How about we leave the tax cuts for those who affect the economy. The small business owner who will get boned if Dems try to repeal Bushes tax cuts. Lets penalize those who make a buck, because its the democratic way. Capitalism and not socialism is the better way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NUKE_CLEVELAND Posted February 1, 2006 Share Posted February 1, 2006 QUOTE(southsideirish71 @ Jan 31, 2006 -> 09:27 PM) There is a better way. How about we leave the tax cuts for those who affect the economy. The small business owner who will get boned if Dems try to repeal Bushes tax cuts. Lets penalize those who make a buck, because its the democratic way. Capitalism and not socialism is the better way. Typical liberalism right there. Lets take from the producers and give it to the non-producers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts