RME JICO Posted February 2, 2006 Share Posted February 2, 2006 The Sox April 2006 schedule consists of 24 games: 3 vs CLE 3 at KC 3 at DET 3 vs TOR 3 vs KC 3 vs MIN 3 at SEA 3 at LAA I don't know if they will match last year's hot start, but the schedule is in their favor. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jordan4life_2007 Posted February 2, 2006 Share Posted February 2, 2006 QUOTE(RME JICO @ Feb 2, 2006 -> 02:54 AM) The Sox April 2006 schedule consists of 24 games: 3 vs CLE 3 at KC 3 at DET 3 vs TOR 3 vs KC 3 vs MIN 3 at SEA 3 at LAA I don't know if they will match last year's hot start, but the schedule is in their favor. It is? Other than the Royals and Mariners, those are some tough teams. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hi8is Posted February 2, 2006 Share Posted February 2, 2006 uhh.... 24 and 0? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
klaus kinski Posted February 2, 2006 Share Posted February 2, 2006 Well, if the "pitchers are ahead of the hitters" at the start of the season as we hear, we should have a good start Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rowand44 Posted February 2, 2006 Share Posted February 2, 2006 15 and 9 seems about right. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevin57 Posted February 2, 2006 Share Posted February 2, 2006 Here are my predictions, series by Series 3 vs CLE Sox 2-1 3 at KC Sox 2-1 3 at DET Sox 2-1 3 vs TOR Tor 2-1 3 vs KC Sox 2-1 3 vs MIN Sox 2-1 3 at SEA Sea 2-1 3 at LAA LAA 2-1 Sox 13-11. I know it doesn't sound very impressive, but my rationale is this: 1) They take the first three series (good start) but we visit TOR where we've had trouble and face a pretty good team. After taking three series, it's difficult to take a fourth straight. We get back on a roll with KC and MIN, but then go to the dreaded West where we fall back into a bit of a slump. Predictions are a bit tricky this early out. I'll be waiting to see how a couple of the ST "experiments" work out. For instance, Anderson in CF, Uribe at #2, etc. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jphat007 Posted February 2, 2006 Share Posted February 2, 2006 (edited) 16-17. I'd imagine we'll throw a sweep in there somewhere. The only series that I'd be worried about is LAA as they'd be out for revenge, but their team sure doesn't look all that great. Edited February 2, 2006 by jphat007 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elrockinMT Posted February 2, 2006 Share Posted February 2, 2006 I'll vote on April 30th. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kalapse Posted February 2, 2006 Share Posted February 2, 2006 3 vs CLE --> 2-1 3 at KC --> 3-0 3 at DET --> 2-1 3 vs TOR --> 2-1 3 vs KC ---> 2-1 3 vs MIN --> 2-1 3 at SEA --> 3-0 3 at LAA --> 1-2 ---------------------- 17-7 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LosMediasBlancas Posted February 2, 2006 Share Posted February 2, 2006 It'll be a slow April and then everyone in the media, Cub fans and 75% of this board will hit the panic button.......and we'll still make the playoffs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChWRoCk2 Posted February 2, 2006 Share Posted February 2, 2006 QUOTE(LosMediasBlancas @ Feb 2, 2006 -> 01:44 PM) It'll be a slow April and then everyone in the media, Cub fans and 75% of this board will hit the panic button.......and we'll still make the playoffs. ^agreed typical reaction from all fans Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Felix Posted February 2, 2006 Share Posted February 2, 2006 QUOTE(Kalapse @ Feb 2, 2006 -> 11:49 AM) 3 vs CLE --> 2-1 3 at KC --> 3-0 3 at DET --> 2-1 3 vs TOR --> 2-1 3 vs KC ---> 2-1 3 vs MIN --> 2-1 3 at SEA --> 3-0 3 at LAA --> 1-2 ---------------------- 17-7 Sums up my thoughts well Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sayitaintso Posted February 2, 2006 Share Posted February 2, 2006 I think that they could win 16-17 games. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jordan4life_2007 Posted February 2, 2006 Share Posted February 2, 2006 QUOTE(LosMediasBlancas @ Feb 2, 2006 -> 12:44 PM) It'll be a slow April and then everyone in the media, Cub fans and 75% of this board will hit the panic button.......and we'll still make the playoffs. I, for one, will never doubt this team again. I'm still embarrased that I acted the way I did during the September slide. I won't make that same mistake again. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dam8610 Posted February 2, 2006 Share Posted February 2, 2006 It's hard to expect much more from a team than a .667 win%, so I voted 16-17. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoeBatterz Posted February 3, 2006 Share Posted February 3, 2006 I am hoping for 16-17 wins, but a 15-9 start would be a .625 clip and equate to 101 victories. What will our magic number be on April 30th? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greg775 Posted February 4, 2006 Share Posted February 4, 2006 I can't imagine anybody being too upset this year no matter what happens. We're coming off the Big Show. I watched a special on Ditka last night and it showed him crying at the press conference when Bears fired him. It made me wonder. Will Oz someday get fired?? Managers are hired to be fired, but this guy brought us a World Series, something unheard of in Chicago, moreso with the Yankees buying themselves pennants all these years. Can you envision Oz EVER getting fired like Ditka did? I think it'd be a tragid day for chicago sports. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RME JICO Posted February 4, 2006 Author Share Posted February 4, 2006 QUOTE(greg775 @ Feb 3, 2006 -> 10:44 PM) I can't imagine anybody being too upset this year no matter what happens. We're coming off the Big Show. I watched a special on Ditka last night and it showed him crying at the press conference when Bears fired him. It made me wonder. Will Oz someday get fired?? Managers are hired to be fired, but this guy brought us a World Series, something unheard of in Chicago, moreso with the Yankees buying themselves pennants all these years. Can you envision Oz EVER getting fired like Ditka did? I think it'd be a tragid day for chicago sports. I doubt that will happen that way, but you never know. I expect Ozzie will go out on his own terms. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted February 4, 2006 Share Posted February 4, 2006 QUOTE(RME JICO @ Feb 3, 2006 -> 10:19 PM) I doubt that will happen that way, but you never know. I expect Ozzie will go out on his own terms. The last World Series winning manager who was fired was Bob Brenley of the Diamondbacks, fired in 2004 after winning in 01. McKeon retired this year. Francona still has the BoSox, Scoscia still has the Angels, Torre still has the Yankees. Leyland led the Marlins in 97, but he resigned after management dismantled the team. Bobby Cox won in 95. Cito Gaston managed the Blue Jays in the pre-strike years, but was fired in 97 and has not managed since. Tom Kelley won in '91 and '87 with the Twinkie bastages, and retired after 2001. Sweet Lou resigned in '92 after winning in 1990 with the Reds. LaRussa resigned in '95 to take over the Redbirds after winning in '89. Lasorda led the Dodgers in '88 and retired in '96. Davey Johnson managed the Mets in '86, and was fired in 1990. So out of the last 20 years, only 3 world series managers have been fired. The rest are either still managing or have retired/resigned, albiet not necessarily on their own terms (i.e. LaRussa). So the Odds certainly seem with the Oz being able to stay on as long as he wants, as long as management doesn't dismantle the team under him (i.e. Gaston in Toronto or Brenley in Arizona). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MurcieOne Posted February 5, 2006 Share Posted February 5, 2006 Im gonna wait and see some of spring training before predicting any of these games.... too many stories, injuries etc... can happen before then. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RME JICO Posted May 1, 2006 Author Share Posted May 1, 2006 17-7, 34% were correct. Almost 49% said 15 or lower. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rowand44 Posted May 1, 2006 Share Posted May 1, 2006 QUOTE(Rowand44 @ Feb 2, 2006 -> 09:28 AM) 15 and 9 seems about right. Good thing I suck. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mreye Posted May 1, 2006 Share Posted May 1, 2006 Exasct same record as 2005. I smell a trend. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kalapse Posted May 1, 2006 Share Posted May 1, 2006 QUOTE(Kalapse @ Feb 2, 2006 -> 11:49 AM) 3 vs CLE --> 2-1 3 at KC --> 3-0 3 at DET --> 2-1 3 vs TOR --> 2-1 3 vs KC ---> 2-1 3 vs MIN --> 2-1 3 at SEA --> 3-0 3 at LAA --> 1-2 ---------------------- 17-7 Well, I got the record correct. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LosMediasBlancas Posted May 1, 2006 Share Posted May 1, 2006 I predicted a losing record in April, glad I was wrong. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.