Jump to content

On her way to mom of the year..


Steff

Recommended Posts

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Feb. 7) -- TMZ has learned that the LA County Department of Chidren and Family Services (DCFS) has contacted the LA County Sheriff's Department, inquiring about Britney driving with her baby on her lap without proper child restraint.

 

TMZ contacted DCFS and an official would not say if the matter was under investigation.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

 

 

http://tmz.aol.com/article1?id=20060207134409990001

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(SSH2005 @ Feb 7, 2006 -> 12:45 PM)
You can't take the trash out of white trash.  Man, Britney hooked up with a hillbilly and has been downhill ever since.

 

Who the hell do you think you are? Talk about trash. Pot meet kettle. :angry: :banghead

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(Iwritecode @ Feb 7, 2006 -> 03:04 PM)
Wouldn't this be the same as getting your picture taken while running a red light? I know they send people tickets in the mail.

 

 

No.

 

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060208/ap_en_...DRrBHNlYwM3NjI-

 

 

The sheriff's department won't pursue any charges, Deputy Luis Castro said.

 

"Unless a deputy saw the violation, there's nothing we can do," he said. "We don't even know if this took place in our jurisdiction."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(Steff @ Feb 8, 2006 -> 09:51 AM)
No.

 

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060208/ap_en_...DRrBHNlYwM3NjI-

The sheriff's department won't pursue any charges, Deputy Luis Castro said.

 

"Unless a deputy saw the violation, there's nothing we can do," he said. "We don't even know if this took place in our jurisdiction."

 

Britney gets a pass in the court of law and a misdemeanor in the court of public opinion. Hopefully sometime in the future when she is "protecting" her baby by "any means" she will stop putting her baby in more danger in the process of taking him out of danger.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(Steff @ Feb 8, 2006 -> 08:51 AM)
No.

 

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060208/ap_en_...DRrBHNlYwM3NjI-

The sheriff's department won't pursue any charges, Deputy Luis Castro said.

 

"Unless a deputy saw the violation, there's nothing we can do," he said. "We don't even know if this took place in our jurisdiction."

 

Yea, I guess that makes sense. They don't know when/where the picture was taken...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(Iwritecode @ Feb 8, 2006 -> 11:18 AM)
Yea, I guess that makes sense. They don't know when/where the picture was taken...

 

It's about the difference between a law violation and an ordinance violation.

 

If it was a violation of criminal law, the police could (if they so chose) pursue an investigation. Whether or not they'd bother on something like this is another question.

 

But this was a traffic ordinance violation. The police have to witness it to ticket her. A police camera at an intersection is, for legal purposes, a police witness. A paparazzi is not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...