SSH2005 Posted February 9, 2006 Share Posted February 9, 2006 Had him cornered in a mountain area of how many square miles? The same thing as having his head in the cross hairs. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Bush bashers seem to forget that 9/11 might never have happened if Clinton had a set of balls. Apparently, the only time he used his balls was with White House interns. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted February 9, 2006 Share Posted February 9, 2006 QUOTE(SSH2005 @ Feb 9, 2006 -> 01:01 PM) Bush bashers seem to forget that 9/11 might never have happened if Clinton had a set of balls. Apparently, the only time he used his balls was with White House interns. And it might never have happened had Bush not ignored the attack on the Cole or Richard Clarke's requests for a principals-level meeting on Al Qaeda in 2001 either. There's plenty o' blame to go around. Should Clinton have done more? In hindsight, absolutely. Should Bush? In hindsight, absolutely. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cknolls Posted February 9, 2006 Share Posted February 9, 2006 QUOTE(Balta1701 @ Feb 9, 2006 -> 12:15 AM) Simply untrue on all accounts, according to the 9/11 commission's final report. This commission was a f***ing joke. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NorthSideSox72 Posted February 9, 2006 Share Posted February 9, 2006 QUOTE(SSH2005 @ Feb 9, 2006 -> 04:01 PM) Bush bashers seem to forget that 9/11 might never have happened if Clinton had a set of balls. Apparently, the only time he used his balls was with White House interns. Why is it that every GOPer on this board seems to think that if you bash Bush, you must have loved Clinton? I think Bush is a pretty lousy President. I think Clinton was a little better, but I'm no fan of his either. I'd love to see just one heavily-posted thread on this board that didn't involve a "Bush Sucks" post followed by a "Clinton Sucks" post (or vice versa). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NorthSideSox72 Posted February 9, 2006 Share Posted February 9, 2006 QUOTE(Cknolls @ Feb 9, 2006 -> 04:04 PM) This commission was a f***ing joke. True that. Lots more heads should have rolled, including some in the executive branch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted February 9, 2006 Share Posted February 9, 2006 QUOTE(Cknolls @ Feb 9, 2006 -> 01:04 PM) This commission was a f***ing joke. I love how the commission finds that there are flaws up and down the system, including both Democratic and Republican administrations, and since they don't judge the Republicans to be perfect, the commission is judged to be a joke. It's probably the most bi-partisan investigation of anything we've had in the last 10 years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kapkomet Posted February 9, 2006 Share Posted February 9, 2006 QUOTE(Balta1701 @ Feb 9, 2006 -> 09:04 PM) And it might never have happened had Bush not ignored the attack on the Cole or Richard Clarke's requests for a principals-level meeting on Al Qaeda in 2001 either. There's plenty o' blame to go around. Should Clinton have done more? In hindsight, absolutely. Should Bush? In hindsight, absolutely. That's true. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NorthSideSox72 Posted February 9, 2006 Share Posted February 9, 2006 QUOTE(Balta1701 @ Feb 9, 2006 -> 04:04 PM) And it might never have happened had Bush not ignored the attack on the Cole or Richard Clarke's requests for a principals-level meeting on Al Qaeda in 2001 either. There's plenty o' blame to go around. Should Clinton have done more? In hindsight, absolutely. Should Bush? In hindsight, absolutely. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted February 9, 2006 Share Posted February 9, 2006 I agree 100% as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mplssoxfan Posted February 9, 2006 Share Posted February 9, 2006 QUOTE(NorthSideSox72 @ Feb 9, 2006 -> 03:04 PM) Why is it that every GOPer on this board seems to think that if you bash Bush, you must have loved Clinton? I think Bush is a pretty lousy President. I think Clinton was a little better, but I'm no fan of his either. I'd love to see just one heavily-posted thread on this board that didn't involve a "Bush Sucks" post followed by a "Clinton Sucks" post (or vice versa). Don't hold your breath, buddy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts