Jump to content

Bulls @ nuggets...


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 74
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

QUOTE(fathom @ Feb 8, 2006 -> 11:26 PM)
BTW, I know this is old news, but Kerr saying "that's in" basically before Okur shot that 3 last game to win it was one of the funniest things I've ever heard during a sports game.

 

I agree. He says it alot though but he is pretty good... probally gets it right 60% of the time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Biggest difference between last year and this year is killing f***ing instinct. It's ridiculous.

 

If gordon averages 30 a game all will be forgiven. :D

 

Btw, this is one of the worst momentum type wins you could hope for. Either blow them the hell out of the building or mount a big come back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(SleepyWhiteSox @ Feb 8, 2006 -> 11:32 PM)
Anybody else concerned that pax might use the knicks pick on jete jete reddick?    :P

 

If we do not draft aldridge or gay i will be so damn pissed. I know we are pretty stacked @ small foward... but you have to make an exception for gay. Drafting aldridge would be the better option considering there are not many bigs in free agency... and no al harrington does not count soxfan101, either does nazr. Would like Would like yo see aldridge bulk up another 8-10 pounds too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(hammerhead johnson @ Feb 8, 2006 -> 11:41 PM)
Isiah Thomas is impressed.  With the trade deadline coming up, Gordon couldn't have picked a better time to start making more than 38% of his shots.

 

If he puts up 30 a game shooting the percentage he has been the last 7-8 games along with his better turnover numbers even you will be impressed with what he brings to this team. Not very often is a player scoring 30 a night and givin up more defensively. If he shoots 44% while scoring 25 a game he would be helping up more than hurting us on an average,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(q\/\/3r+y @ Feb 9, 2006 -> 05:37 AM)
If we do not draft aldridge or gay i will be so damn pissed. I know we are pretty stacked @ small foward... but you have to make an exception for gay. Drafting aldridge would be the better option considering there are not many bigs in free agency... and no al harrington does not count soxfan101, either does nazr. Would like Would like yo see aldridge bulk up another 8-10 pounds too.

 

Lol i get a mention without making a post :P . And I have nothing against Aldridge btw id love getting Rudy Gay more but 2nd choice is Aldridge.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(SoxFan101 @ Feb 9, 2006 -> 06:40 PM)
Lol i get a mention without making a post  :P .  And I have nothing against Aldridge btw id love getting Rudy Gay more but 2nd choice is Aldridge.....

Can I ask why the need for Gay when you already have Deng and Nocioni at SF? Unless Gay can play at SG of course.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Idonno I always go under philosphy when you get a pick that high you take the best player available.....im sure with Gay that would prob signify the end of Nocioni with the Bulls if not by trade by f/a....

 

And usually on most nights we would be able to matchup either Gay or Deng with the other team's SG.... which would give us a huge size advantage....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(DBAH0 @ Feb 9, 2006 -> 01:54 AM)
Can I ask why the need for Gay when you already have Deng and Nocioni at SF? Unless Gay can play at SG of course.

 

Exactly why we wouldn't draft him before aldridge in my opinion. If we ended up getting the second pick and aldridge is already gone... gay is not a bad constellation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(SoxFan101 @ Feb 9, 2006 -> 02:10 AM)
Is Aldridge really as good as advertised.... I honestly havent seen him really play or if I have it wasnt that much....

 

Yes, he is. He's 6'11, 245. He's very skilled, long, athletic and handles the ball well for a big. Just think Chris Bosh. I definitely agree with Qwerty about taking Aldridge if he's there when we pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(Jordan4life_2006 @ Feb 9, 2006 -> 07:53 PM)
Yes,  he is.  He's 6'11,  245.  He's very skilled,  long,  athletic and handles the ball well for a big.  Just think Chris Bosh.  I definitely agree with Qwerty about taking Aldridge if he's there when we pick.

And I think more importantly, Aldridge could probably bulk up to about 265-270 lbs, kind of like what Dwight Howard is doing, which would allow him to play C, and keep Chandler at PF, because the last 10 games have definitely shown Chandler can thrive in the PF spot.

 

Soxfan101, I do mostly agree on taking the best player available of course, but if the Bulls took Gay, then they would have to trade Noc, and it'd be hard to get equal value for him when you probably need to deal him. C is such a huge weakness, and good young big's are just so god damn hard to find (in aspects other then scoring so Mr. Curry doesn't count :P), so the Bulls could really make a franchise building move here. Pretty much every PF/C that has come out in the past few years in the Draft (from the college system) and taken in the top 5 has been a success as well e.g Howard, Okafor, Bosh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...