Drew Posted February 14, 2006 Share Posted February 14, 2006 I started a thread on this earlier today but it looks like it didn't take. Virtually all the talk about Sox lineup changes have revolved around moving Uribe to no. 2 and Iguchi down to anywhere between no. 5 and 7, and some talk of putting BA in the no. 8 slot, moving Crede down to 9 to give the rookie a chance to see more pitches. But what to do with the 3, 4, 5 slots? We've got Paulie, a career no. 4 hitter, whose best years have been at that spot behind Thomas and no. 5 behind Ordoñez, and in whose limitid time at the slot hasn't produced as well at no. 3. We've got Thome who was ostensibly brought in to protect Paulie in the order, but is a career no. 3 hitter with his best production in that slot. We've got Dye who has hit everywhere between 3-6, and did well enough in the 3-slot to garner a World Series MVP. It'd make the most sense to me to bat them in the order of Thome-Konerko-Dye, but of course this is all conjecture because Ozzie spent the entire season fiddling with the batting order every few days anyway. With all this taken into account, I'd envision something close to: Podsednik Uribe Thome Konerko Dye Pierzynski Iguchi Anderson Crede Thoughts? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
santo=dorf Posted February 14, 2006 Share Posted February 14, 2006 Agree completely with the lineup Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jordan4life_2007 Posted February 14, 2006 Share Posted February 14, 2006 QUOTE(Drew @ Feb 14, 2006 -> 05:26 PM) I started a thread on this earlier today but it looks like it didn't take. Virtually all the talk about Sox lineup changes have revolved around moving Uribe to no. 2 and Iguchi down to anywhere between no. 5 and 7, and some talk of putting BA in the no. 8 slot, moving Crede down to 9 to give the rookie a chance to see more pitches. But what to do with the 3, 4, 5 slots? We've got Paulie, a career no. 4 hitter, whose best years have been at that spot behind Thomas and no. 5 behind Ordoñez, and in whose limitid time at the slot hasn't produced as well at no. 3. We've got Thome who was ostensibly brought in to protect Paulie in the order, but is a career no. 3 hitter with his best production in that slot. We've got Dye who has hit everywhere between 3-6, and did well enough in the 3-slot to garner a World Series MVP. It'd make the most sense to me to bat them in the order of Thome-Konerko-Dye, but of course this is all conjecture because Ozzie spent the entire season fiddling with the batting order every few days anyway. With all this taken into account, I'd envision something close to: Podsednik Uribe Thome Konerko Dye Pierzynski Iguchi Anderson Crede Thoughts? I'd flip flop Pierzynski and Gooch. I agree with everything else. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DABearSoX Posted February 14, 2006 Share Posted February 14, 2006 I believe that should be the lineup 92% of the time.....but we have to trust the Wizard the wonderful wizard of OZ. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SSH2005 Posted February 15, 2006 Share Posted February 15, 2006 Podsednik Uribe Thome Konerko Dye Iguchi Pierzynski Anderson Crede Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AddisonStSox Posted February 15, 2006 Share Posted February 15, 2006 Sounds like the Sox brass want a 3-5 of: Dye Konerko Thome Can anyone else attest to this? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tannerfan Posted February 15, 2006 Share Posted February 15, 2006 QUOTE(SSH2005 @ Feb 14, 2006 -> 07:01 PM) Podsednik Uribe Thome Konerko Dye Iguchi Pierzynski Anderson Crede I think Dye should start the year at #3 because of how he did in the post season. Also he must run better than Thome. Also AJ should be ahead of Iguchi so the order goes right left right. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sircaffey Posted February 15, 2006 Share Posted February 15, 2006 QUOTE(AddisonStSox @ Feb 14, 2006 -> 06:35 PM) Sounds like the Sox brass want a 3-5 of: Dye Konerko Thome Can anyone else attest to this? The trib had an article either Saturday or Sunday that implied Dye was the 5th hitter. That Oz might want some protect for Dye, so moving Gooch down would do that...Something like that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AddisonStSox Posted February 15, 2006 Share Posted February 15, 2006 QUOTE(sircaffey @ Feb 14, 2006 -> 06:37 PM) The trib had an article either Saturday or Sunday that implied Dye was the 5th hitter. That Oz might want some protect for Dye, so moving Gooch down would do that...Something like that. Fair enough. It's just that the things I've been hearding would suggest otherwise. If we're guessing: Podsednik Uribe Dye Konerko Thome Iguchi Pierzynski Crede Anderson Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sircaffey Posted February 15, 2006 Share Posted February 15, 2006 I personally don't see why there would be a benefit to putting Jermaine in the 3 hole. .380+ OBP in front of Pauly instead of a .330 OBP is quite a difference. Also, Jermaine provides solid protection for Pauly as well. What is the benefit for Dye hitting 3rd? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sircaffey Posted February 15, 2006 Share Posted February 15, 2006 Pods Uribe Dye There would be a lot of 1-2-3 1st innings with those 3 going up there. With our ridiculous record when we score first, I would think you'd want Thome in the 1st inning, but that's just my opinion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SSH2005 Posted February 15, 2006 Share Posted February 15, 2006 I personally don't see why there would be a benefit to putting Jermaine in the 3 hole. .380+ OBP in front of Pauly instead of a .330 OBP is quite a difference. Also, Jermaine provides solid protection for Pauly as well. What is the benefit for Dye hitting 3rd? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> It wouldn't make much sense. Dye is the third best hitter among Thome, Konerko, and Dye. He should bat fifth. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AddisonStSox Posted February 15, 2006 Share Posted February 15, 2006 QUOTE(sircaffey @ Feb 14, 2006 -> 06:43 PM) Pods Uribe Dye There would be a lot of 1-2-3 1st innings with those 3 going up there. With our ridiculous record when we score first, I would think you'd want Thome in the 1st inning, but that's just my opinion. I absolutely agree with you. You keep the L-R-L with that lineup, you have a guy with a higher on base, and can protect him with both Paulie and Dye...it makes a whole lot of sense to me. But, just remember... "I make tha damng lineup" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TLAK Posted February 15, 2006 Share Posted February 15, 2006 Traditionally you put your best OBP at 3. Jim Thome ------.408 Paul Konerko---.349 Jermaine Dye---.334 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3E8 Posted February 15, 2006 Share Posted February 15, 2006 (edited) Ozzie Me Pods Pods Uribe Iguchi Thome Thome Konerko Konerko Dye Dye AJ Crede Iguchi AJ Anderson Uribe Crede Anderson Edited February 15, 2006 by 3E8 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greasywheels121 Posted February 15, 2006 Share Posted February 15, 2006 QUOTE(3E8 @ Feb 14, 2006 -> 08:58 PM) Ozzie Me Pods Pods Uribe Iguchi Thome Thome Konerko Konerko Dye Dye AJ Crede Uribe AJ Anderson Uribe Crede Anderson Ozzie really loves Uribe, doesn't he? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3E8 Posted February 15, 2006 Share Posted February 15, 2006 QUOTE(greasywheels121 @ Feb 14, 2006 -> 09:01 PM) Ozzie really loves Uribe, doesn't he? I got so excited about making a table that I messed it up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted February 15, 2006 Share Posted February 15, 2006 QUOTE(TLAK @ Feb 14, 2006 -> 08:53 PM) Traditionally you put your best OBP at 3. Jim Thome ------.408 Paul Konerko---.349 Jermaine Dye---.334 Exactly. You have got to get the guys on base for your RBI guys to drive them in. It doesn't make sense otherwise. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TLAK Posted February 15, 2006 Share Posted February 15, 2006 QUOTE(3E8 @ Feb 14, 2006 -> 08:03 PM) I got so excited about making a table that I messed it up. Cool table, you can join us all in HTML hell! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve9347 Posted February 15, 2006 Share Posted February 15, 2006 QUOTE(AddisonStSox @ Feb 14, 2006 -> 07:35 PM) Sounds like the Sox brass want a 3-5 of: Dye Konerko Thome Can anyone else attest to this? thats what ive heard. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RME JICO Posted February 15, 2006 Share Posted February 15, 2006 The difference between the #3 and #5 hitter also means about 40-50 ABs a year. Would the Sox rather have Thome or Dye getting those ABs? It would make more sense to have Thome in that spot. I like: Podsednik - L Uribe Thome - L Konerko Dye Iguchi Pierzynski - L Anderson Crede Also, Mackowiak can come in and pinch hit to add another LH bat to the lineup. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nitetrain8601 Posted February 15, 2006 Share Posted February 15, 2006 I doubt Crede bats 9th. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NorthSideSox72 Posted February 15, 2006 Share Posted February 15, 2006 (edited) There is no good reason to bat Dye 3rd. Thome and Konerko are both far better hitters than he is. The only argument being made here is that Dye batted 3rd last season - well, that was true because we didn't have Jim Thome (we had Jurassic Carl). With Thome in there, he makes the most sense, and Williams has said so. Edited February 15, 2006 by NorthSideSox72 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RockRaines Posted February 15, 2006 Share Posted February 15, 2006 QUOTE(NorthSideSox72 @ Feb 15, 2006 -> 08:59 AM) There is no good reason to bat Dye 3rd. Thome and Konerko are both far better hitters than he is. The only argument being made here is that Dye batted 3rd last season - well, that was true because we didn't have Jim Thome (we had Jurassic Carl). With Thome in there, he makes the most sense, and Williams has said so. I think his good reason to think that is because the 16-1 tear we went on with Dye in the 3-hole. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NorthSideSox72 Posted February 15, 2006 Share Posted February 15, 2006 QUOTE(RockRaines @ Feb 15, 2006 -> 10:18 AM) I think his good reason to think that is because the 16-1 tear we went on with Dye in the 3-hole. I wouldn't put streak that in Dye's lap. Nothing on Dye, he's exactly what we need in RF and the 5 slot, but he just isn't in the same league as a 3-hitter that Thome is (assuming Thome is healhty). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.