Jump to content

SI AL Central Preview


chitownsportsfan

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 54
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

QUOTE(knightni @ Feb 15, 2006 -> 07:27 PM)
I doubt it.

 

Nuke will be back with his ALL CAPS TITLED posts if the Sox win or lose.

 

People who are sports fans overreact good or bad.

 

This is gonna be the least non stressful year for me as a Sox fan ever. What's the worst that can happpen in 06? We don't repeat? I got my dream in 05. If it never happens again, I'll be cool.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(pale_hose @ Feb 15, 2006 -> 09:35 PM)
Previews always piss me off...they are fun to read, but the "experts" are never right about their previews....i do believe that SI had the Sox 3rd in the central last year

i like the fantasy baseball previews more......gives you a better analysis of the teams and the players, rookies and all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(pale_hose @ Feb 15, 2006 -> 09:35 PM)
Previews always piss me off...they are fun to read, but the "experts" are never right about their previews....i do believe that SI had the Sox 3rd in the central last year

I bet you would like it if it questioned whether or not Brian Anderson is ready

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(redandwhite @ Feb 15, 2006 -> 08:00 PM)
Add Joe Crede to that list. 

 

The guy is put up on a pedestal here for his contributions down the stretch last year.  Little do people remember the fact that he was one of the easiest outs, in one of the most friendly offensive parks in the game, for over three-fourths of the season last year.

 

He had OPS's of >.823 in 4 months of the season(April, June, July, and September), and also had a .941 OPS in the playoffs. He was injured for about half of August, so by my count, he was an easy out at the plate in like a month and a half of the season, which would be the exact opposite of what you said.

 

QUOTE(SoxFan1 @ Feb 15 2006 -> 10:03 PM)
I that the only "expert" who predicted the White Sox to win the division in 2005 was Mike Greenberg.

 

The beloved Rob Neyer also did. He backed off of that after a month, which made no sense whatsoever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sizing up which teams belong on top

By Jerry Crasnick

http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/columns/stor...erry&id=2331387

NATIONAL LEAGUE EAST

New York Mets

 

NATIONAL LEAGUE CENTRAL

St. Louis Cardinals

 

NATIONAL LEAGUE WEST

San Francisco Giants

 

AMERICAN LEAGUE EAST

New York Yankees

 

AMERICAN LEAGUE CENTRAL

Chicago White Sox

 

AMERICAN LEAGUE WEST

Oakland Athletics

AMERICAN LEAGUE CENTRAL

Chicago White Sox

 

GM Kenny Williams spent half his winter doubled over in pain because of kidney stones, but it didn't impede his ability to think clearly. He changed the look of the batting order by acquiring Jim Thome, dipped into the farm system to pry Javier Vazquez loose from the Diamondbacks, and picked up Rob Mackowiak as a third-base hedge in case Joe Crede's back acts up.

 

It remains to be seen whether manager Ozzie Guillen, now a full-fledged celebrity, is as good at maintaining harmony as he was in cultivating it, or whether Thome can rebound from injury to upgrade a middle-of-the-pack offense. The Sox went 61-33 in games decided by one or two runs last season. Don't expect that again. And closer Bobby Jenks still must prove he can handle success, keep his weight in check and answer those nagging maturity questions over the course of an entire season.

 

The division is also packed, with Cleveland coming off 93 victories, Minnesota stacked with pitching and Detroit a potential dark horse under new manager Jim Leyland. But the Sox are loaded in the rotation, and Williams, to his credit, didn't let sentimentality stand in the way of self-improvement. The White Sox are just back from the White House and they've gotten better. You sure can't pick against them.

Edited by SSH2005
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I will enjoy this season and those after a lot more now that I did get to see us win it all once. That's the only "downer" of us winning it all, I won't have an unhealthy emotional attachment to us winning it all, since I've finally seen us do it, but i'll be as big a fan as ever of course.

 

And with that said, I agree with all the complaints mentioned in this thread will be mentioned in 2006. As for me, the only one I think I will have is that I think Ozzie Guillen is easily the worst in game manager in our division among the top 4 teams.

 

And you can put that quote in your sig if you want, because we could win the World Series again and I'll still think that. This team is ALL about pitching and home runs, and luckily we are going to be damned good at doing both.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't believe you guys still can't see why Ozzie made the in games moves he did during the season. He kept his subs sharp and his regulars rested. He also showed in the post season that he can change when circumstances do. He kept running his regulars out there with a 'win today' mentality, which so many of you think he should have game in, game out throughout the course of a 162 game season. He shouldn't, and I for one am very happy he doesn't.

 

Of course, I preached this all throughout the season last year, but I thought a WS championship would have convinced most of you doubters. I should have known better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(YASNY @ Feb 16, 2006 -> 02:35 AM)
I can't believe you guys still can't see why Ozzie made the in games moves he did during the season.  He kept his subs sharp and his regulars rested.  He also showed in the post season that he can change when circumstances do.  He kept running his regulars out there with a 'win today' mentality, which so many of you think he should have game in, game out throughout the course of a 162 game season.  He shouldn't, and I for one am very happy he doesn't. 

 

Of course, I preached this all throughout the season last year, but I thought a WS championship would have convinced most of you doubters.  I should have known better.

 

There are plenty of people who can't see past the next pitch to understand that sometimes a loss can be beneficial down the road.

 

Many other people have been preaching about Ozzies "Not for today, but for October" managing style since he got here. I'll say this again for everyone who spazzes out over every detail in a game...

 

IT.DOESN'T.MATTER.

 

Ozzie is looking at a game, a pitch, an AB today as an insight to what he can use and do in the playoffs/pressure games. How would Ozzie have known that Neal Cotts was his best set up man last year, if he had never tested him out in the roll early in the season, and instead stuck with the Jerry Manuel style of pigeonholing pitchers into specific rolls and innings? He wouldn't have. Its not a 100% science and sometimes guys aren't cut out for what he needs, and yes, it costs us a game in July. But if you will notice, in September and October, Ozzie always had the perfect move up his sleeve. That isn't a coincidence. That came because Ozzie knew his players and their abilities better than any other manager in baseball, because he had already tested them.

 

Now I know that as soon as the season starts we'll have the usual suspects freaking out over everything, and that I am probably wasting my keyboard with this post, but maybe... just maybe, it will click for someone, and they can actually enjoy the games a little more, instead of losing sleep because Ozzie used Cliff Politte in a situation instead of Bobby Jenks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(YASNY @ Feb 16, 2006 -> 01:35 AM)
I can't believe you guys still can't see why Ozzie made the in games moves he did during the season.  He kept his subs sharp and his regulars rested.  He also showed in the post season that he can change when circumstances do.  He kept running his regulars out there with a 'win today' mentality, which so many of you think he should have game in, game out throughout the course of a 162 game season.  He shouldn't, and I for one am very happy he doesn't. 

 

Of course, I preached this all throughout the season last year, but I thought a WS championship would have convinced most of you doubters.  I should have known better.

 

There are certain things Ozzie does as a manager right now that will cause me to never be sold on his in game skills, regardless of what we win (hell, we could win again this year for all I know). He's a great clubhouse leader and the best manager in baseball during the 21 hours the game isn't being played, by a mile and a half, and that's worth something obviously. But his in game manager skills and strategy simply aren't very good, and I can't look past that.

 

Yes, we won the damn WORLD SERIES last year, which means after a bad loss, I won't be on here freaking out all the time. But, I will sit whereever I was watching the game, whether it be at home, a friends house, or some restaurant, and think "Ozzie, WTF are you doing?" like I did after a lot of games the last 2 years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(southsider2k5 @ Feb 16, 2006 -> 07:30 AM)
There are plenty of people who can't see past the next pitch to understand that sometimes a loss can be beneficial down the road.

 

Many other people have been preaching about Ozzies "Not for today, but for October" managing style since he got here.  I'll say this again for everyone who spazzes out over every detail in a game... 

 

IT.DOESN'T.MATTER. 

 

Ozzie is looking at a game, a pitch, an AB today as an insight to what he can use and do in the playoffs/pressure games.  How would Ozzie have known that Neal Cotts was his best set up man last year, if he had never tested him out in the roll early in the season, and instead stuck with the Jerry Manuel style of pigeonholing pitchers into specific rolls and innings?  He wouldn't have.  Its not a 100% science and sometimes guys aren't cut out for what he needs, and yes, it costs us a game in July.  But if you will notice, in September and October, Ozzie always had the perfect move up his sleeve.  That isn't a coincidence.  That came because Ozzie knew his players and their abilities better than any other manager in baseball, because he had already tested them.

 

Now I know that as soon as the season starts we'll have the usual suspects freaking out over everything, and that I am probably wasting my keyboard with this post, but maybe... just maybe, it will click for someone, and they can actually enjoy the games a little more, instead of losing sleep because Ozzie used Cliff Politte in a situation instead of Bobby Jenks.

 

That is a good post, but to condense it it seems to me you think the problem people have with Ozzie is his experimentation with players in key spots, especially early in the year. To be honest with you, I have no problem with him doing that. It drives me nuts, but I understand it. There are many other issues with Ozzie that are of far bigger concern to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(witesoxfan @ Feb 15, 2006 -> 11:19 PM)
The beloved Rob Neyer also did.  He backed off of that after a month, which made no sense whatsoever.

 

if you remember following the 04 World Series, the ESPN panel was given a quick oppurtunity to say who they thought would win the World Series in 05 and Peter Gammons called on the White Sox as the favorites.

 

He later changed his tune, but its interesting to note.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(YASNY @ Feb 16, 2006 -> 02:35 AM)
I can't believe you guys still can't see why Ozzie made the in games moves he did during the season.  He kept his subs sharp and his regulars rested.  He also showed in the post season that he can change when circumstances do.  He kept running his regulars out there with a 'win today' mentality, which so many of you think he should have game in, game out throughout the course of a 162 game season.  He shouldn't, and I for one am very happy he doesn't. 

 

Of course, I preached this all throughout the season last year, but I thought a WS championship would have convinced most of you doubters.  I should have known better.

 

Personally, I've not had a problem with Ozzie's resting and rotating of players. In fact, any analysis of the post-season reveals what a genius he was.

 

The only :huh I have about Ozzie sometimes are his bullpen moves. I probably agree with him 80% of the time, but the other 20% are truly baffling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(redandwhite @ Feb 16, 2006 -> 06:18 PM)
if you remember following the 04 World Series, the ESPN panel was given a quick oppurtunity to say who they thought would win the World Series in 05 and Peter Gammons called on the White Sox as the favorites.

 

 

He more or less said that as a joke but I do remember what you're talking about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...