Steff Posted February 24, 2006 Share Posted February 24, 2006 http://www.wral.com/news/7373950/detail.html# With student who is 18... POSTED: 4:38 pm EST February 23, 2006 UPDATED: 5:37 pm EST February 23, 2006 GOLDSBORO, N.C. -- A Wayne County teacher has been arrested and charged with a felony for allegedly having sex with an 18-year-old male student. Laurie Spurlock, 36, of Goldsboro, a teacher at Charles B. Aycock High School, turned herself in to authorities Thursday afternoon after the Wayne County Public School System asked the sheriff's office to investigate. The relationship was reported to the Wayne County Sheriff's Office as having occurred between mid-September 2005 and January 2006, but the alleged accusations against Spurlock did not occur on school property, according to authorities. Spurlock, who is listed as an English teacher on the Wayne County school system's Web site, was charged with two counts of felony sexual offense with a student. Secured bond has been set at $15,000. The case, according to the sheriff's office, is still under investigation. It's not right, IMO, ... but the legal age of consent in NC is 16. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bmags Posted February 24, 2006 Share Posted February 24, 2006 that's gross. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GoodAsGould Posted February 24, 2006 Share Posted February 24, 2006 if it didnt happen in school even if its gross since the kid is legal age how is that illegal? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flash Tizzle Posted February 24, 2006 Share Posted February 24, 2006 This student must have been attracted to manly women with facial hair. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AngelasDaddy0427 Posted February 24, 2006 Share Posted February 24, 2006 QUOTE(Flash Tizzle @ Feb 24, 2006 -> 01:02 AM) This student must have been attracted to manly women with facial hair. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Please like you haven't hit worse in a time of drunken desperation... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted February 24, 2006 Share Posted February 24, 2006 If the guy was 18, where is the crime? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steff Posted February 24, 2006 Author Share Posted February 24, 2006 QUOTE(southsider2k5 @ Feb 24, 2006 -> 08:52 AM) If the guy was 18, where is the crime? Found it.. http://www.ncleg.net/EnactedLegislation/St...S_14-202.4.html § 14‑202.4. Taking indecent liberties with a student. (a) If a defendant, who is a teacher, school administrator, student teacher, school safety officer, or coach, at any age, or who is other school personnel and is at least four years older than the victim, takes indecent liberties with a victim who is a student, at any time during or after the time the defendant and victim were present together in the same school but before the victim ceases to be a student, the defendant is guilty of a Class I felony, unless the conduct is covered under some other provision of law providing for greater punishment. A person is not guilty of taking indecent liberties with a student if the person is lawfully married to the student. (B) If a defendant, who is school personnel, other than a teacher, school administrator, student teacher, school safety officer, or coach, and who is less than four years older than the victim, takes indecent liberties with a student as provided in subsection (a) of this section, the defendant is guilty of a Class A1 misdemeanor. © Consent is not a defense to a charge under this section. (d) For purposes of this section, the following definitions apply: (1) "Indecent liberties" means: a. Willfully taking or attempting to take any immoral, improper, or indecent liberties with a student for the purpose of arousing or gratifying sexual desire; or b. Willfully committing or attempting to commit any lewd or lascivious act upon or with the body or any part or member of the body of a student. For purposes of this section, the term indecent liberties does not include vaginal intercourse or a sexual act as defined by G.S. 14‑27.1. (1a) "Same school" means a school at which (i) the student is enrolled or is present for a school‑sponsored or school‑related activity and (ii) the school personnel is employed, volunteers, or is present for a school‑sponsored or school‑related activity. (2) "School" means any public school, charter school, or nonpublic school under Parts 1 and 2 of Article 39 of Chapter 115C of the General Statutes. (3) "School personnel" means any person included in the definition contained in G.S. 115C‑332(a)(2), and any person who volunteers at a school or a school‑sponsored activity. (3a) "School safety officer" means any other person who is regularly present in a school for the purpose of promoting and maintaining safe and orderly schools and includes a school resource officer. (4) "Student" means a person enrolled in kindergarten, or in grade one through grade 12 in any school. (1999‑300, s. 1; 2003‑98, s. 2; 2004‑203, s. 19(a).) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyyle23 Posted February 24, 2006 Share Posted February 24, 2006 Wow, so the only illegal thing that was done here was only the fact that she was his teacher, not that he was 16 when it started and 18 now? That is strange. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted February 24, 2006 Share Posted February 24, 2006 Interesting. I wonder if that law would actually stand up to constitutinal muster? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NorthSideSox72 Posted February 24, 2006 Share Posted February 24, 2006 QUOTE(southsider2k5 @ Feb 24, 2006 -> 10:01 AM) Interesting. I wonder if that law would actually stand up to constitutinal muster? I can't see any constitutional grounds or connection one way or another. I don't think it would come up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Critic Posted February 24, 2006 Share Posted February 24, 2006 QUOTE(Jeckle2000 @ Feb 24, 2006 -> 01:08 AM) Please like you haven't hit worse in a time of drunken desperation... Oh sure, NOW the kid'll get charged with underage drinking!!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RockRaines Posted February 24, 2006 Share Posted February 24, 2006 Granted this particular case involves a troll of a teacher. But so many of these involve good looking and downright hot teachers. Where was that crap when I was in HS? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LosMediasBlancas Posted February 24, 2006 Share Posted February 24, 2006 QUOTE(Flash Tizzle @ Feb 24, 2006 -> 02:02 AM) This student must have been attracted to manly women with facial hair. I'm gonna stick my neck out there and assume she might have other issues. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.