Jump to content

ESPN "Expert" Picks


Winning Ugly

Recommended Posts

QUOTE(SSH2005 @ Mar 27, 2006 -> 10:47 PM)
Tigers fans called him Karlos Pena.  Kinda like Korey Patterson.  :D

Uh oh, you have a rival for the clever nickname competition.

 

This post has been edited by Rowand44: Today, 11:48 PM

This post has been edited by Rowand44: Today, 11:48 PM

This post has been edited by Rowand44: Today, 11:48 PM

This post has been edited by Rowand44: Today, 11:48 PM

This post has been edited by Rowand44: Today, 11:48 PM

This post has been edited by Rowand44: Today, 11:48 PM

This post has been edited by Rowand44: Today, 11:48 PM

This post has been edited by Rowand44: Today, 11:48 PM

This post has been edited by Rowand44: Today, 11:48 PM

This post has been edited by Rowand44: Today, 11:48 PM

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 128
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Yea, but Pena is 2 years younger than Gload, and might put up some better numbers in the future. I'm not saying we should sign up, especially as money is an object, and trading away Borchard makes Gload's relative versatility a virtue.

 

Yea, I really can't believe the story of Choi, dude does nothing but put up good numbers for a cheap contract, and he keeps getting shown the door. Doesn't make much snese to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(Gene Honda Civic @ Mar 27, 2006 -> 11:48 PM)
Polanco >>>>>>> Infante -- Both offensively and defensively.

 

Plus why would you want to remove Inge from the line-up only to be replaced by Infante?

I am still not sold on Inge everyday. I think he is better suited to the UTL roll. 23 errors at 3B, so it's not concerned at defense, Infante had 13 less errors. Inge is a career .238, Infante is a career .246. I think allowing Inge to move around would help him, as he played every position two years ago.

 

It's not Polanco vs Infante, it's Polanco 3B/Infante 2B vs Polanco 2B/Inge 3B too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(SuperSteve @ Mar 27, 2006 -> 10:55 PM)
I am still not sold on Inge everyday. I think he is better suited to the UTL roll. 23 errors at 3B, so it's not concerned at defense, Infante had 13 less errors. Inge is a career .238, Infante is a career .246. I think allowing Inge to move around would help him, as he played every position two years ago.

 

It's not Polanco vs Infante, it's Polanco 3B/Infante 2B vs Polanco 2B/Inge 3B too.

With the Tigers staff, they need to score as much as possible. Inge has developed into a decent hitter since he moved from C. He's also one of the rangiest 3B in the game, which makes up for his errors.

 

I don't know how you can make up for a .250 OBP like Infante posted last year. I think he should consult Timo for that one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey, would it be accurate to say that the AL has 7 of the 10 best teams in the majors this year?

 

New York

Boston

Chicago

Cleveland

Minnesota

Anaheim

Oakland

St. Louis

Houston

Atlanta

 

Call me crazy, but that's how I see it. Put the Twins in the NL East or the NL West, and they're Division winners IMO.

 

The Wild Card Race in the AL is going to be insane this year.

Edited by hammerhead johnson
Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(hammerhead johnson @ Mar 28, 2006 -> 12:04 AM)
Hey, would it be accurate to say that the AL has 7 of the 10 best teams in the majors this year?

 

New York

Boston

Chicago

Cleveland

Minnesota

Anaheim

Oakland

St. Louis

Houston

Atlanta

 

Call me crazy, but that's how I see it.  Put the Twins in the NL East or the NL West, and they're Division winners IMO.

 

The Wild Card Race in the AL is going to be insane this year.

I don't think Houston should be in that list (losing Clemens is a huge blow), nor should Minnesota. Since right now we are only talking about teams on paper, the Mets should be there, as should the Phillies.

 

But yes, the AL is much better than the NL.

Edited by Felix
Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(Gene Honda Civic @ Mar 28, 2006 -> 12:01 AM)
With the Tigers staff, they need to score as much as possible. Inge has developed into a decent hitter since he moved from C. He's also one of the rangiest 3B in the game, which makes up for his errors.

 

I don't know how you can make up for a .250 OBP like Infante posted last year. I think he should consult Timo for that one.

.317 the year before. He can do it. I think the Tigers staff will be better than people give them credit for. Bonderman is a hurler, Kenny Rogers will have fun with the cameramen in the big D, Robertson and Maroth arn't terrible, and Verlander is kinda like BMac to us as we may get a prize, may not. I like Roman Colon too. Their pen, well their pen sucks. They have power too. Mags, IRod, Monroe, Thames, Shelton, Polanco, Guillen... not terrible, not great, but still.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(hammerhead johnson @ Mar 27, 2006 -> 11:04 PM)
Hey, would it be accurate to say that the AL has 7 of the 10 best teams in the majors this year?

 

New York

Boston

Chicago

Cleveland

Minnesota

Anaheim

Oakland

St. Louis

Houston

Atlanta

 

Call me crazy, but that's how I see it.  Put the Twins in the NL East or the NL West, and they're Division winners IMO.

 

The Wild Card Race in the AL is going to be insane this year.

You forgot Toronto who would also win the east or west in the nl imo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(hammerhead johnson @ Mar 27, 2006 -> 11:07 PM)
Who would you take out of that group?

All the nl teams. :lol: Atlanta would probably be the team though cause as you noted, they have serious bullpen issues and now no Leo. The NL is really awful this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(hammerhead johnson @ Mar 28, 2006 -> 12:06 AM)
Atlanta's bullpen sucks balls, too.  They have a few too many raw position players.  Putting them in the Top 10 is a stretch, actually.

Hudson, Smoltz, Sosa, Thomson (assuming not dealt), & Ramierez. They have a solid core, I'd take the Mets over them, but the Mets do that every year. Renteria could have a turn around, Giles, Jones, Jones, Larouche, Francouer, McCann was good in playoffs. They're the Braves too. Leo Mazzone is gone though, if they get bullpen and stay healthy, they'll be fine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(SuperSteve @ Mar 27, 2006 -> 11:10 PM)
Hudson, Smoltz, Sosa, Thomson (assuming not dealt), & Ramierez. They have a solid core, I'd take the Mets over them, but the Mets do that every year. Renteria could have a turn around, Giles, Jones, Jones, Larouche, Francouer, McCann was good in playoffs. They're the Braves too. Leo Mazzone is gone though, if they get bullpen and stay healthy, they'll be fine.

I fully expect Francouer to suck this year and suck badly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(Felix @ Mar 28, 2006 -> 12:05 AM)
I don't think Houston should be in that list (losing Clemens is a huge blow), nor should Minnesota.  Since right now we are only talking about teams on paper, the Mets should be there, as should the Phillies.

 

But yes, the AL is much better than the NL.

Ignored :(

 

QUOTE(Rowand44 @ Mar 28, 2006 -> 12:11 AM)
I fully expect Francouer to suck this year and suck badly.

I agree completely :)

Edited by Felix
Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(SuperSteve @ Mar 27, 2006 -> 11:06 PM)
.317 the year before. He can do it. I think the Tigers staff will be better than people give them credit for. Bonderman is a hurler, Kenny Rogers will have fun with the cameramen in the big D, Robertson and Maroth arn't terrible, and Verlander is kinda like BMac to us as we may get a prize, may not. I like Roman Colon too. Their pen, well their pen sucks. They have power too. Mags, IRod, Monroe, Thames, Shelton, Polanco, Guillen... not terrible, not great, but still.

That's not much of an argument for Infante. The only thing he's got going for him is he's young. But that ship sailed when they signed Polanco long-term.

 

Inge is their best 3B offensively and defensively

Polanco is their best 2B offensively and defensively

Guillen is their best SS offensively and defensively.

 

All of which spells lots of time on the pine for Infante.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(Gene Honda Civic @ Mar 28, 2006 -> 12:15 AM)
That's not much of an argument for Infante. The only thing he's got going for him is he's young. But that ship sailed when they signed Polanco long-term.

 

Inge is their best 3B offensively and defensively

Polanco is their best 2B offensively and defensively

Guillen is their best SS offensively and defensively.

 

All of which spells lots of time on the pine for Infante.

I am not comparing Inge to Infante. How is Inge better than Polanco at 3B? Range? Eh. Neither Inge or Infante are awesome at the plate. Where did Inge have his best year? As a UTL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...