rventura23 Posted April 26, 2006 Author Share Posted April 26, 2006 QUOTE(Kalapse @ Apr 25, 2006 -> 08:49 PM) Hell, in 1884 Charley Radbourn went 59-12 with a 1.38 ERA all by his lonesome. of course none of that s*** counts seeing how he also had 73 GS and 73 CG that season, that's why we split things up and really only count stats from the modern era. true altough 1884 is very different from 1904 in baseball that duo led the league in wins in 9 out of 11 years, which is impressive Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whitesoxfan99 Posted April 26, 2006 Share Posted April 26, 2006 QUOTE(MarlinFan84 @ Apr 25, 2006 -> 09:49 PM) I personally just have trouble seeing Carpenter as dominant. I see a guy that was horrible in Toronto, and then just becomes dominant? To me, the guy is still a 1 hit wonder. As for Mulder, he hasn't been all that great for a while. 2 years ago Carpenter was 15-5 with a 3.46 ERA and was 4th in the NL in WHIP. Last year he won the Cy Young and he is dominating so far this season. Sure doesn't look like a 1 hit wonder to me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wedge Posted April 26, 2006 Share Posted April 26, 2006 QUOTE(lord chas @ Apr 25, 2006 -> 08:05 PM) i bet we will be on more of these kind of lists once we win a championship Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarlinFan84 Posted April 26, 2006 Share Posted April 26, 2006 QUOTE(whitesoxfan99 @ Apr 25, 2006 -> 09:03 PM) 2 years ago Carpenter was 15-5 with a 3.46 ERA and was 4th in the NL in WHIP. Last year he won the Cy Young and he is dominating so far this season. Sure doesn't look like a 1 hit wonder to me. He didn't really deserve the cy young last year though. And 2004 he wasnt anywhere near dominant, and he was horrible his entire career before that. I'm not sold that 2005 was the real Carpenter, he still strikes me as a 10-15 win high 3 low 4 era type pitcher. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knightni Posted April 26, 2006 Share Posted April 26, 2006 1864 baseball rules though! http://media.putfile.com/Conan-1864-baseball59 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GoodAsGould Posted April 26, 2006 Share Posted April 26, 2006 QUOTE(knightni @ Apr 26, 2006 -> 05:20 AM) 1864 baseball rules though! http://media.putfile.com/Conan-1864-baseball59 Lol i remember watching that a long time ago.... its one of Conan's best moments in my opinion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rventura23 Posted April 26, 2006 Author Share Posted April 26, 2006 QUOTE(knightni @ Apr 26, 2006 -> 12:20 AM) 1864 baseball rules though! http://media.putfile.com/Conan-1864-baseball59 conan is hilarious Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qwerty Posted April 26, 2006 Share Posted April 26, 2006 QUOTE(MarlinFan84 @ Apr 25, 2006 -> 11:27 PM) He didn't really deserve the cy young last year though. And 2004 he wasnt anywhere near dominant, and he was horrible his entire career before that. I'm not sold that 2005 was the real Carpenter, he still strikes me as a 10-15 win high 3 low 4 era type pitcher. Three s*** years and three above average years before he came to the national league does not qualify as horrible. His era+ in that time frame was 98... slightly below league average. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hammerhead johnson Posted April 26, 2006 Share Posted April 26, 2006 QUOTE(Steve9347 @ Apr 26, 2006 -> 02:21 AM) josh beckett and curt schilling?? Yeah, they're only a combined 7-0 thus far. Have you looked at their WHIP, ERA, BAA numbers, etc? You also said that Buehrle is more valuable than Johan Santana. Do you follow baseball outside of the White Sox? Doesn't sound like it. I smell a flip-floppin' Cubs fan. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rowand44 Posted April 26, 2006 Share Posted April 26, 2006 QUOTE(hammerhead johnson @ Apr 26, 2006 -> 01:23 AM) Yeah, they're only a combined 7-0 thus far. Have you looked at their WHIP, ERA, BAA numbers, etc? And by this time next month they'll both probably be on the dl. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hammerhead johnson Posted April 26, 2006 Share Posted April 26, 2006 QUOTE(Rowand44 @ Apr 26, 2006 -> 07:27 AM) And by this time next month they'll both probably be on the dl. Let's hope that they're not 100% come October, because I don't want to see those guys in the playoffs. They're f***ing insane when healthy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.