Gene Honda Civic Posted April 13, 2006 Share Posted April 13, 2006 (edited) My specific question is where was Pods in the 9th? Mackowiak isn't considered a defensive upgrade unless you're talking about throwing arm, and then you would only think about putting him out there if the tying run was on third with The more general question is when will Pods (and the Sox) finally admit that he's not right? He blew off the media yesterday, not wanting to talk about his poor start. I assume he'll do the same again today. I can't imagine him wanting to reminisce about going 0-4 again. Edited April 13, 2006 by Gene Honda Civic Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steff Posted April 13, 2006 Share Posted April 13, 2006 Maybe he just needs a slump buster.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NorthSideSox72 Posted April 13, 2006 Share Posted April 13, 2006 QUOTE(Steff @ Apr 13, 2006 -> 04:11 PM) Maybe he just needs a slump buster.. LOL Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iWiN4PreP Posted April 13, 2006 Share Posted April 13, 2006 Maybe he just needs a slump buster.. A little duckstourt (sp?). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AddisonStSox Posted April 13, 2006 Share Posted April 13, 2006 QUOTE(Gene Honda Civic @ Apr 13, 2006 -> 04:07 PM) My specific question is where was Pods in the 9th? Mackowiak isn't considered a defensive upgrade unless you're talking about throwing arm, and then you would only think about putting him out there if the tying run was on third with A simple answer would be, "why risk a starter to injury when the game is in hand?" But, I'm sure you could have gone around the infield and could have made the same, if not better, cases for those starters. So, my answer would be something along the lines of, "why risk a starter to injury that is still bothered by a nagging injury." Which of the two makes more sense to you? The answer lies somewhere between those two. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve9347 Posted April 13, 2006 Share Posted April 13, 2006 QUOTE(iWiN4PreP @ Apr 13, 2006 -> 06:50 PM) A little duckstourt (sp?). Duck Snort. A Duck Snort. what the hell is a stourt? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fathom Posted April 13, 2006 Share Posted April 13, 2006 QUOTE(AddisonStSox @ Apr 13, 2006 -> 11:51 PM) A simple answer would be, "why risk a starter to injury when the game is in hand?" But, I'm sure you could have gone around the infield and could have made the same, if not better, cases for those starters. So, my answer would be something along the lines of, "why risk a starter to injury that is still bothered by a nagging injury." Which of the two makes more sense to you? The answer lies somewhere between those two. Here's the biggest problem: It's brutally obvious that Pods just is a terrible baseball player when he's not 100 pct. We saw signs of this last year, and he's just been flat out awful so far this year. However, we don't have anyone that we can really place in LF for him to start on a regular basis. It's a tough call for KW and Ozzie....and I think it's a damn shame to mildly negate a red-hot 2/3/4 like we have right now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AddisonStSox Posted April 14, 2006 Share Posted April 14, 2006 (edited) QUOTE(fathom @ Apr 13, 2006 -> 05:56 PM) Here's the biggest problem: It's brutally obvious that Pods just is a terrible baseball player when he's not 100 pct. We saw signs of this last year, and he's just been flat out awful so far this year. However, we don't have anyone that we can really place in LF for him to start on a regular basis. It's a tough call for KW and Ozzie....and I think it's a damn shame to mildly negate a red-hot 2/3/4 like we have right now. Bingo. You've hit the nail squarely on the head. For those of you calling for Podsednik to hit the shelf in hopes of some sort of double or triple A solution, what has this organization shown you in the past for you to believe they are protecting Scott Podsednik at this point? If you can't get it done, you're out. It's as simple as that. In fact, I would argue that's what helped get the 2005 team to post-season play. If the answer was there, Podsednik would be on the shelf. It's not. The answer is not there. What this situation--Podsednik as an automatic out at the top of a championship calibur ballclub--should tell you is neither Sweeney nor Owens are ready to make the jump. It's just not that easy. Hell, look at what Kenny's pride and joy is doing in centerfield. It is a nasty situation, that could be made worse both playing and not playing Podsednik. At this point, they've decided it's best for him--nay, the Sox--to try and work things out. It's not about protecting anybody's ego and if he can't get his s*** together in the next couple of weeks, they'll be talking more and more to the farm about, "are you sure Sweeney still has to work the holes out of that swing?" Edited April 14, 2006 by AddisonStSox Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aboz56 Posted April 14, 2006 Share Posted April 14, 2006 I think he needs some time either in extended spring training or in Charlotte or a trip to the DL. Right now, he's just not getting it done and he just doesn't look right. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gene Honda Civic Posted April 14, 2006 Author Share Posted April 14, 2006 Third question: Why have an automatic out at the top of the lineup? There's plenty of room for him at the bottom of the lineup with Anderson. They're already batting next to each other. -- I call that inning the beer frame. It only lasts about the time it takes to make a run to get a beer, and by the time you're back to your seat, the inning's over and you didn't miss anything exciting. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jphat007 Posted April 14, 2006 Share Posted April 14, 2006 (edited) QUOTE(fathom @ Apr 13, 2006 -> 05:56 PM) Here's the biggest problem: It's brutally obvious that Pods just is a terrible baseball player when he's not 100 pct. We saw signs of this last year, and he's just been flat out awful so far this year. However, we don't have anyone that we can really place in LF for him to start on a regular basis. It's a tough call for KW and Ozzie....and I think it's a damn shame to mildly negate a red-hot 2/3/4 like we have right now. I'm not sure I agree with all of this. He wasn't 100% in Sept and Oct, healthier than August I'd say, but nowhere near 100%, and he was pretty awesome in September and October. I think he's just going through a slump like most of our guys went through last year and will go through this year. Unfortunately it is magnified at the beginning of the year. I do think this slump is exacerbated by the fact that he was injured at the end of spring though. He's obviously not "right" Hopefully he'll break out sooner than later. Edited April 14, 2006 by jphat007 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flash Tizzle Posted April 14, 2006 Share Posted April 14, 2006 (edited) QUOTE(Gene Honda Civic @ Apr 13, 2006 -> 06:17 PM) Third question: Why have an automatic out at the top of the lineup? There's plenty of room for him at the bottom of the lineup with Anderson. They're already batting next to each other. -- I call that inning the beer frame. It only lasts about the time it takes to make a run to get a beer, and by the time you're back to your seat, the inning's over and you didn't miss anything exciting. Management will place Podsednik on the DL long before they consider removing him from the leadoff position. You know more goes into personnel decisions than what's right for the team. His confidence may be shattered moving down below Anderson!!111 Admittingly, I've missed this afternoon's game-- so I can't judge the quality of his AB's. Or how he appeared running out grounders (if any were hit). Players utilizing speed such as Podsednik shouldn't be in 2- for season- funks. Why hasn't he attempted more drag bunts? It just doesn't make sense to me. Something is noticeably wrong. You can even begin to notice how lack of production is affecting him defensely. So now, it may be turning into a physical AND mental problem. If this continues for another week, someone will have to make a decision. I believe 50 AB's should be enough to alteast guage whether he's truly healthy, and making strides, or needs time off. Edited April 14, 2006 by Flash Tizzle Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mmmmmbeeer Posted April 14, 2006 Share Posted April 14, 2006 QUOTE(Gene Honda Civic @ Apr 13, 2006 -> 06:17 PM) Third question: Why have an automatic out at the top of the lineup? There's plenty of room for him at the bottom of the lineup with Anderson. They're already batting next to each other. -- I call that inning the beer frame. It only lasts about the time it takes to make a run to get a beer, and by the time you're back to your seat, the inning's over and you didn't miss anything exciting. Those two back to back in the order is not pretty. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ndgt10 Posted April 14, 2006 Share Posted April 14, 2006 Maybe this is the true pods...maybe he was playing over his head last year... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dick Allen Posted April 14, 2006 Share Posted April 14, 2006 (edited) The Sox problem is they really don't have much of a choice as far as leading off goes. Ozuna could, but do you really want him in the OF? Of course the way Pods has hit, and thrown the leather, and if it were to continue, Widger would be a better choice as a lead-off man. I am pretty biased, though. I have really never been a Pod's fan except for Oct. 23rd, 2005. Edited April 14, 2006 by Dick Allen Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NorthSideSox72 Posted April 14, 2006 Share Posted April 14, 2006 QUOTE(iWiN4PreP @ Apr 13, 2006 -> 05:50 PM) A little duckstourt (sp?). Unless I was reading too much into Steff's post, I don't think that is what she meant (even if it were spelled correctly). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBigHurt Posted April 14, 2006 Share Posted April 14, 2006 (edited) Mack would prolly be the best option over Pods right now, but I can't see it happening. Pods being productive is a MAJOR key to the success of this team. Unfortunately, it's not happening right now. Hopefully it IS a slump rather than being more related to injury. I really hope he finds his groove, and soon would be good. Edited April 14, 2006 by TheBigHurt Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wanne Posted April 14, 2006 Share Posted April 14, 2006 Women Weakin Legs... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve9347 Posted April 14, 2006 Share Posted April 14, 2006 (edited) QUOTE(Ndgt10 @ Apr 13, 2006 -> 07:51 PM) Maybe this is the true pods...maybe he was playing over his head last year... No. For the first half last year, Podsednik was what he is when healthy... an incredible lead off hitter. He slugged .344, singles, singles, singles, and walks, walks, walks. He was healthy, got in every pitchers head when he was on the base paths. Speed doesn't go into slumps, but injuries hinders speed. I say put him on the DL, lead off with Mackowiak for the time being. The thing is, these groin injuries need rest. If it isn't his groin, send him down and let him get some at-bats. If Frank Thomas can go to AAA for some at-bats, so can Scott Podsednik. We can weather that storm. Edited April 14, 2006 by Steve9347 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Texsox Posted April 14, 2006 Share Posted April 14, 2006 It is still to early this season, but I'll admit hearing C-Lee rob a home run with his defense and then hitting a game winner today, has me wondering who did better in the trade. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShoeLessRob Posted April 14, 2006 Share Posted April 14, 2006 QUOTE(Texsox @ Apr 13, 2006 -> 08:49 PM) It is still to early this season, but I'll admit hearing C-Lee rob a home run with his defense and then hitting a game winner today, has me wondering who did better in the trade. I'll take a World Series over Carlos any day of the week, month, or year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gregory Pratt Posted April 14, 2006 Share Posted April 14, 2006 QUOTE(Texsox @ Apr 13, 2006 -> 08:49 PM) It is still to early this season, but I'll admit hearing C-Lee rob a home run with his defense and then hitting a game winner today, has me wondering who did better in the trade. Podsednik has stolen homeruns before. We did better. For one, how many World Series homeruns has Carlos Lee hit? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoxAce Posted April 14, 2006 Share Posted April 14, 2006 I guarantee you we would not have gone all the way last year without Pods, anyway, shape, or form. Hell, we had a losing record without him in the lineup. He made such a huge difference. That's why alot of posters here are getting on his case for his slow start because he is one of the most important pieces in our lineup. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve9347 Posted April 14, 2006 Share Posted April 14, 2006 QUOTE(Texsox @ Apr 13, 2006 -> 09:49 PM) It is still to early this season, but I'll admit hearing C-Lee rob a home run with his defense and then hitting a game winner today, has me wondering who did better in the trade. We won the f***ing World Series partly because of Scott Podsednik! Without Pods last year, we don't win it... So I'd say we did a little better, regardless of what El Caballo does from here on out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chisoxdavid Posted April 14, 2006 Share Posted April 14, 2006 QUOTE(ShoeLessRob @ Apr 13, 2006 -> 08:51 PM) I'll take a World Series over Carlos any day of the week, month, or year. I agree, if not for Pods we woulda been the same team of the past- all about power and when it counts we dont have it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.