3 BeWareTheNewSox 5 Posted April 24, 2006 Share Posted April 24, 2006 Monopoly is coming out with a modern version of the game, and is using online voting for each city to have a landmark represent the city. The choices for Chicago are Wrigely Field, Michigan Avenue, and Navy Pier. Of course, Wrigley is leading 67%, and Michigan Avenue is the next closest at 18%. I voted for Michigan Avenue anyways, but I don't want that stinky urinal, team, and a history of losing representing the city, making the generalization that all people in Chicago care about is the Cubs and dissing the Sox even more. I don't know how popular Monopoly will be in the future, but future generations will grow up to this, so rock the vote http://www.hasbro.com/monopoly/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RockRaines Posted April 24, 2006 Share Posted April 24, 2006 There are alot of landmarks left off of that list, but out of those 3 Wrigley Field is a pretty obvious choice IMO. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Controlled Chaos Posted April 24, 2006 Share Posted April 24, 2006 Now that loaction will be cursed. If you own wrigley field it's pretty much set in stone you will not win the game. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kid Gleason Posted April 24, 2006 Share Posted April 24, 2006 QUOTE(Controlled Chaos @ Apr 24, 2006 -> 02:35 PM) Now that loaction will be cursed. If you own wrigley field it's pretty much set in stone you will not win the game. LOL!!! You're looking for a "POTM" with that one! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SleepyWhiteSox Posted April 24, 2006 Share Posted April 24, 2006 Have the parker brothers never heard of the Sears Tower??? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gregory Pratt Posted April 24, 2006 Share Posted April 24, 2006 QUOTE(SleepyWhiteSox @ Apr 24, 2006 -> 03:40 PM) Have the parker brothers never heard of the Sears Tower??? What the hell is a Sears Tower?!?! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chisoxdavid Posted April 24, 2006 Share Posted April 24, 2006 (edited) They should of added the Ada B. Wells projects. The old Soldiers Field would of been nice. Edited April 24, 2006 by chisoxdavid Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kid Gleason Posted April 24, 2006 Share Posted April 24, 2006 QUOTE(chisoxdavid @ Apr 24, 2006 -> 04:55 PM) They should of added the Ada B. Wells projects. The old Soldiers Field would of been nice. But it had its landmark status revoked. Though it is up for a Nebula Award this year. http://www.sfwa.org/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rex Hudler Posted April 26, 2006 Share Posted April 26, 2006 Soldiers Field?? I've heard of Soldier Field, but never Soldiers Field. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.