Jump to content

White Sox @ Mariners 4/26


Rowand44

Recommended Posts

QUOTE(SSH2005 @ Apr 26, 2006 -> 10:13 PM)
I'd rather have Sizemore starting in LF and batting leadoff with Podsednik off the team.

 

I must say I'm glad your back posting more. Especially at this point in time after losing 2 of 3.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 465
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

QUOTE(Gene Honda Civic @ Apr 26, 2006 -> 10:10 PM)
We would have won this game if Bobby doesn't give up that run.

 

Dumbass Hargrove would have brought in everyday eddie to give up the GW-HR... But since it's not a save situation, he brings in someone who can pitch.

It didn't happen too often last season, but two years ago--whether we were down 4 runs or 1--if the pitching gave up another run in the late innings our offense would come back, but fall short of however many runs the scrub reliever gave up.

 

Looks like now that won't happen anyways. If we would have scored three it would have been.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(SSH2005 @ Apr 27, 2006 -> 04:13 AM)
I'd rather have Sizemore starting in LF and batting leadoff with Podsednik off the team.

 

Thank you. I can't believe anyone would still rather have Pods as their leadoff hitter over Sizemore. Sizemore's going to be a 10 time All-Star....and Pods is going to be batting 9th for the Royals in a couple of years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(fathom @ Apr 26, 2006 -> 11:14 PM)
Thank you.  I can't believe anyone would still rather have Pods as their leadoff hitter over Sizemore.  Sizemore's going to be a 10 time All-Star....and Pods is going to be batting 9th for the Royals in a couple of years.

If Pods can't do better than 50% stealing, he'll be lucky to be getting paid by the Schaumburg Flyers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Saying that you would rather have Sizemore starting in LF over Podsednik is not being negative -- it's being realistic.

 

No it isn't. We can't get Sizemore so why even care about that?

I wish we had Rowand instead of Pods, tho Pods has been hot lately.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(greg775 @ Apr 27, 2006 -> 04:18 AM)
Saying that you would rather have Sizemore starting in LF over Podsednik is not being negative -- it's being realistic.

 

No it isn't. We can't get Sizemore so why even care about that?

I wish we had Rowand instead of Pods, tho Pods has been hot lately.

 

Greg...we're not talking about actually acquiring Sizemore. This is a decade old argument we've had with jphat that he'd rather have Pods as a leadoff hitter than Sizemore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...