whitesoxfan101 Posted May 1, 2006 Share Posted May 1, 2006 He says if he could have ANY PLAYER IN THE GAME.......he'd take Jonathan Papelbon. That could be the dumbest thing he's ever said, and that's saying something. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rowand44 Posted May 1, 2006 Share Posted May 1, 2006 LOL, I saw that as well. Good s***. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted May 1, 2006 Share Posted May 1, 2006 At least Kruk made the correct choice. Seriously, what do you have to have in your system not to say Pujols? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Critic Posted May 1, 2006 Share Posted May 1, 2006 QUOTE(Balta1701 @ Apr 30, 2006 -> 11:43 PM) At least Kruk made the correct choice. Seriously, what do you have to have in your system not to say Pujols? A large dose of f***tardery? Paperboy is a fine closer, but how anyone would pass on Albert is beyond me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whitesoxfan101 Posted May 1, 2006 Author Share Posted May 1, 2006 To be honest, I'd take the DEVIL RAYS STARTER today (Kazmir) over Papelbon if you asked me to pick 1 for my team. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rowand44 Posted May 1, 2006 Share Posted May 1, 2006 QUOTE(Balta1701 @ Apr 30, 2006 -> 11:43 PM) At least Kruk made the correct choice. Seriously, what do you have to have in your system not to say Pujols? Widger? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fathom Posted May 1, 2006 Share Posted May 1, 2006 QUOTE(Balta1701 @ May 1, 2006 -> 05:43 AM) Seriously, what do you have to have in your system not to say Pujols? Ask Freddy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whitesoxfan101 Posted May 1, 2006 Author Share Posted May 1, 2006 QUOTE(fathom @ May 1, 2006 -> 01:05 AM) Ask Freddy He wouldn't know, it would take a lot more than weed to pick Papelbon over Phat Albert. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsideirish71 Posted May 1, 2006 Share Posted May 1, 2006 (edited) QUOTE(whitesoxfan101 @ Apr 30, 2006 -> 11:39 PM) He says if he could have ANY PLAYER IN THE GAME.......he'd take Jonathan Papelbon. That could be the dumbest thing he's ever said, and that's saying something. This is the same genius who in the same show that thank god Thome is doing well, because Konerko is struggling. .360BA, 6 dongs, 20 RBI, .433OBP and a .640SLG. Yeah Mullet thats f***ing struggling. So dippy Mullet would also take Paplebon over say Santana from the twins. Whats a perennial Cy Young type pitcher who is a second half unhittable pitcher, but Santana didnt get a Mohawk. That must be it. Edited May 1, 2006 by southsideirish71 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hammerhead johnson Posted May 1, 2006 Share Posted May 1, 2006 You have to be country retarded to pick Papelbon. I mean, what the f*** is that. I'll go with Alex Rodriguez if you let me stick him back at SS. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChWRoCk2 Posted May 1, 2006 Share Posted May 1, 2006 Any player, I tend to like youth Ill take Fielder or Ryan Howard in a heartbeat but if any player than it has to be Albert Pujols. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Critic Posted May 1, 2006 Share Posted May 1, 2006 QUOTE(ChWRoCk2 @ May 1, 2006 -> 12:38 AM) Any player, I tend to like youth Ill take Fielder or Ryan Howard in a heartbeat but if any player than it has to be Albert Pujols. I wouldn't take Fielder for the sole reason that I can see him ballooning to gigantic proportions in no time. He's gonna make late-era Tony Gwynn look like an anorexic dwarf. Dude's gonna eat himself outta the game if he ain't careful. He's already got the bouncin' titties when he runs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyyle23 Posted May 1, 2006 Share Posted May 1, 2006 QUOTE(The Critic @ May 1, 2006 -> 01:47 AM) I wouldn't take Fielder for the sole reason that I can see him ballooning to gigantic proportions in no time. He's gonna make late-era Tony Gwynn look like an anorexic dwarf. Dude's gonna eat himself outta the game if he ain't careful. He's already got the bouncin' titties when he runs. He uses those bouncin titties like Homer does to hit a ball. Bouncin titties are VITAL to his swing. How dare you knock those bouncin titties Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Critic Posted May 1, 2006 Share Posted May 1, 2006 QUOTE(kyyle23 @ May 1, 2006 -> 06:40 AM) He uses those bouncin titties like Homer does to hit a ball. Bouncin titties are VITAL to his swing. How dare you knock those bouncin titties HEY, don't get me wrong - I have a REAL appreciation for the bouncin' titties!! Bouncin' titties hold a VITAL role in our society, and have played a major role in some of the best moments of my life!!! ....I just don't really want to see them on MALE athletes.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Texsox Posted May 1, 2006 Share Posted May 1, 2006 In related news, people are actually talking about Brantley today, much different than if he said Pooholes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WilliamTell Posted May 1, 2006 Share Posted May 1, 2006 When I heard him say that last night I started laughing so hard, normally I'd just give a funny look but this was hilarious. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GoodAsGould Posted May 1, 2006 Share Posted May 1, 2006 QUOTE(ChWRoCk2 @ May 1, 2006 -> 06:38 AM) Any player, I tend to like youth Ill take Fielder or Ryan Howard in a heartbeat but if any player than it has to be Albert Pujols. Howard is about the same age as Pujol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheHawkaroo Posted May 1, 2006 Share Posted May 1, 2006 QUOTE(whitesoxfan101 @ Apr 30, 2006 -> 11:39 PM) He says if he could have ANY PLAYER IN THE GAME.......he'd take Jonathan Papelbon. That could be the dumbest thing he's ever said, and that's saying something. He also said the White Sox should be happy they got THomes because Konerko is getting off to a slow start. Last time I checked Konerko was getting off to the best start of his career, .360 6 HR 20 RBI, talk about a "slow start" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CarlosMartinez Posted May 2, 2006 Share Posted May 2, 2006 I'm glad others caught that crap about Konerko being off to a slow start. That f***in guy should be shot. Wasn't it Brantley that ripped Ozzie last season for his handling of the pen? Where does ESPN come up with these tools to talk baseball? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted May 2, 2006 Share Posted May 2, 2006 QUOTE(CarlosMartinez @ May 1, 2006 -> 05:23 PM) Where does ESPN come up with these tools to talk baseball? Boston and New York. Obviously. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Hurtin Posted May 2, 2006 Share Posted May 2, 2006 It's not his fault. The writers put up Peter Gammons' cue card by mistake. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YASNY Posted May 2, 2006 Share Posted May 2, 2006 QUOTE(CarlosMartinez @ May 1, 2006 -> 06:23 PM) I'm glad others caught that crap about Konerko being off to a slow start. That f***in guy should be shot. Wasn't it Brantley that ripped Ozzie last season for his handling of the pen? Where does ESPN come up with these tools to talk baseball? Brantley and 65% of Soxtalk. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RibbieRubarb Posted May 2, 2006 Share Posted May 2, 2006 Wasn't there a issue last year with Brantley and the Sox? Almost an media agrument between him and Guillen?? I remember something... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyyle23 Posted May 2, 2006 Share Posted May 2, 2006 QUOTE(RibbieRubarb @ May 2, 2006 -> 07:25 AM) Wasn't there a issue last year with Brantley and the Sox? Almost an media agrument between him and Guillen?? I remember something... Yeah, Ozzie didnt bring Hermanson in to close a game( i cant remember if the Sox blew the game or not) and Brantley dwelled on it for two segments on BBTN. Ozzie got pissed and ranted about it, and the next time Brantley was in town he went to smooth things over. He extended his hand, and IIRC, Ozzie just looked at it and didnt shake it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kalapse Posted May 2, 2006 Share Posted May 2, 2006 QUOTE(kyyle23 @ May 2, 2006 -> 07:42 AM) Yeah, Ozzie didnt bring Hermanson in to close a game( i cant remember if the Sox blew the game or not) and Brantley dwelled on it for two segments on BBTN. Ozzie got pissed and ranted about it, and the next time Brantley was in town he went to smooth things over. He extended his hand, and IIRC, Ozzie just looked at it and didnt shake it. I do believe that was the Timo game winning single game versus the Angels. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.