jphat007 Posted May 2, 2006 Share Posted May 2, 2006 Boone looks good. Glad Ozzie let him work out of the situation in Seattle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heads22 Posted May 2, 2006 Share Posted May 2, 2006 Boone strands 2, with the K of Victor. If we can draw a positive out of this series, it looks like Boone doesn't totally suck anymore. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heads22 Posted May 2, 2006 Share Posted May 2, 2006 QUOTE(Rowand44 @ May 2, 2006 -> 01:11 PM) The Boonester Boonemeister. Booneorama. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigSqwert Posted May 2, 2006 Share Posted May 2, 2006 I'm waiting for the "What's wrong with Mark Beuhrle?" thread to pop up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fathom Posted May 2, 2006 Share Posted May 2, 2006 QUOTE(KevHead0881 @ May 2, 2006 -> 06:10 PM) Kinda sounds familiar... Dye is hurt, Podsednik and Pierzynski don't play against lefties very often, and Thome has played every game this year. Dye started the game. He's not part of the 3 starters out that we're mad about. I have no problem with Thome sitting today. However, Pods should have definitely been in the lineup. It's not a big deal though....hopefully Ozzie realizes that his 33 pct off lineups are 0-2 now, while his normal starting lineups with Pods, Iguchi, Thome, PK, Dye, AJP, Crede, Uribe, and Anderson have an extremely high winning pct so far. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rowand44 Posted May 2, 2006 Share Posted May 2, 2006 QUOTE(fathom @ May 2, 2006 -> 12:12 PM) Dye started the game. He's not part of the 3 starters out that we're mad about. I have no problem with Thome sitting today. However, Pods should have definitely been in the lineup. It's not a big deal though....hopefully Ozzie realizes that his 33 pct off lineups are 0-2 now, while his normal starting lineups with Pods, Iguchi, Thome, PK, Dye, AJP, Crede, Uribe, and Anderson have an extremely high winning pct so far. Ozzie's not changing his approach. It's just not gonna happen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Melissa1334 Posted May 2, 2006 Share Posted May 2, 2006 jeeze, juan and anderson are terrible. maybe we can trade anderson for murton, move pods to center >yea, anderson might become an all-star, but he clearly isnt ready. jeeze, i dont even think chris young would be doing as poorly if he was on the team. :banghead Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SleepyWhiteSox Posted May 2, 2006 Share Posted May 2, 2006 QUOTE(fathom @ May 2, 2006 -> 01:12 PM) Dye started the game. He's not part of the 3 starters out that we're mad about. I have no problem with Thome sitting today. However, Pods should have definitely been in the lineup. It's not a big deal though....hopefully Ozzie realizes that his 33 pct off lineups are 0-2 now, while his normal starting lineups with Pods, Iguchi, Thome, PK, Dye, AJP, Crede, Uribe, and Anderson have an extremely high winning pct so far. I'm not sure if Buerhle helped the cause much... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigSqwert Posted May 2, 2006 Share Posted May 2, 2006 QUOTE(Melissa1334 @ May 2, 2006 -> 01:14 PM) jeeze, juan and anderson are terrible. maybe we can trade anderson for murton, move pods to center >yea, anderson might become an all-star, but he clearly isnt ready. jeeze, i dont even think chris young would be doing as poorly if he was on the team. :banghead You been smoking up with freddy? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fathom Posted May 2, 2006 Share Posted May 2, 2006 QUOTE(Melissa1334 @ May 2, 2006 -> 06:14 PM) jeeze, juan and anderson are terrible. maybe we can trade anderson for murton, move pods to center >yea, anderson might become an all-star, but he clearly isnt ready. jeeze, i dont even think chris young would be doing as poorly if he was on the team. :banghead Ha...not a chance in hell Cubs would trade Murton for Anderson. Also, if you put Pods in CF, this team won't make the playoffs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NorthSideSox72 Posted May 2, 2006 Share Posted May 2, 2006 You guys with the "Sunday Lineup" complaints kill me. Seriously, you sound like you live in a video game. In the real world, human beings need this little thing called "rest", to help prevent "injuries". And the subs need playing time, or else when you do need them, they suck. And they came in yesterday from the left coast, and now have a day game after night game, and will travel again today to play tomorrow. And oh yeah, WE WON A F***ING WORLD CHAMPIONSHIP THIS WAY. It works. Its proven. And we often win games with the "Sunday Lineup". Enjoy it! As for Buerhle, well, can't help you there. Maybe Ozzie wanted him to get his 6 in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heads22 Posted May 2, 2006 Share Posted May 2, 2006 QUOTE(Melissa1334 @ May 2, 2006 -> 01:14 PM) jeeze, juan and anderson are terrible. maybe we can trade anderson for murton, move pods to center >yea, anderson might become an all-star, but he clearly isnt ready. jeeze, i dont even think chris young would be doing as poorly if he was on the team. :banghead Pods isn't really a centerfielder..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rowand44 Posted May 2, 2006 Share Posted May 2, 2006 QUOTE(Melissa1334 @ May 2, 2006 -> 12:14 PM) jeeze, juan and anderson are terrible. maybe we can trade anderson for murton, move pods to center ya, that's a tremenous idea. <_> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigSqwert Posted May 2, 2006 Share Posted May 2, 2006 QUOTE(NorthSideSox72 @ May 2, 2006 -> 01:15 PM) You guys with the "Sunday Lineup" complaints kill me. But why sit 3 of them at once...against a division rival? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RockRaines Posted May 2, 2006 Share Posted May 2, 2006 QUOTE(winninguglyin83 @ May 2, 2006 -> 12:09 PM) ball game. let logan and Thornton finish it out. maybe it will start raining harder. And then go find a center fielder. Is Randy Winn available? Maybe San Diego would dump Cameron's salary. Padres are not going to contend. hope for a Royals win over the Tigers and come home and repay the Mariners. Whats wrong with our CF'er? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NorthSideSox72 Posted May 2, 2006 Share Posted May 2, 2006 QUOTE(BigSqwert @ May 2, 2006 -> 12:16 PM) But why sit 3 of them at once...against a division rival? If you read more than that one sentence of my post, you'd see the answer to that question. Day game after night, after west coast trip, travel day again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rowand44 Posted May 2, 2006 Share Posted May 2, 2006 QUOTE(BigSqwert @ May 2, 2006 -> 12:16 PM) But why sit 3 of them at once...against a division rival? Why change what worked last year? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fathom Posted May 2, 2006 Share Posted May 2, 2006 QUOTE(SleepyWhiteSox @ May 2, 2006 -> 06:15 PM) I'm not sure if Buerhle helped the cause much... Of course. We lose today's game no matter who was playing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigSqwert Posted May 2, 2006 Share Posted May 2, 2006 Sheesh. 1 run on 9 hits and 4 walks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LosMediasBlancas Posted May 2, 2006 Share Posted May 2, 2006 QUOTE(RockRaines @ May 2, 2006 -> 01:16 PM) Whats wrong with our CF'er? C'mon Rock, he's not hitting .420 after just one month. He's useless. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsideirish71 Posted May 2, 2006 Share Posted May 2, 2006 QUOTE(NorthSideSox72 @ May 2, 2006 -> 12:15 PM) You guys with the "Sunday Lineup" complaints kill me. Seriously, you sound like you live in a video game. In the real world, human beings need this little thing called "rest", to help prevent "injuries". And the subs need playing time, or else when you do need them, they suck. And they came in yesterday from the left coast, and now have a day game after night game, and will travel again today to play tomorrow. And oh yeah, WE WON A F***ING WORLD CHAMPIONSHIP THIS WAY. It works. Its proven. And we often win games with the "Sunday Lineup". Enjoy it! As for Buerhle, well, can't help you there. Maybe Ozzie wanted him to get his 6 in. We won the division last year because we attacked our division. Our sunday lineups were for other teams. We changed our rotation middle of the season so the top of our rotation would face our division more. We were not resting 3 and 4 starters against the Indians and the Twins last year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpringfieldFan Posted May 2, 2006 Share Posted May 2, 2006 QUOTE(NorthSideSox72 @ May 2, 2006 -> 01:15 PM) You guys with the "Sunday Lineup" complaints kill me. Seriously, you sound like you live in a video game. In the real world, human beings need this little thing called "rest", to help prevent "injuries". And the subs need playing time, or else when you do need them, they suck. And they came in yesterday from the left coast, and now have a day game after night game, and will travel again today to play tomorrow. And oh yeah, WE WON A F***ING WORLD CHAMPIONSHIP THIS WAY. It works. Its proven. And we often win games with the "Sunday Lineup". Enjoy it! As for Buerhle, well, can't help you there. Maybe Ozzie wanted him to get his 6 in. Personally, I think we won the world championship in spite of the Sunday lineups But its all good; tomorrow's another day... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsideirish71 Posted May 2, 2006 Share Posted May 2, 2006 And Uribe strands more runners. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fathom Posted May 2, 2006 Share Posted May 2, 2006 QUOTE(southsideirish71 @ May 2, 2006 -> 06:18 PM) We won the division last year because we attacked our division. Our sunday lineups were for other teams. We changed our rotation middle of the season so the top of our rotation would face our division more. We were not resting 3 and 4 starters against the Indians and the Twins last year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NorthSideSox72 Posted May 2, 2006 Share Posted May 2, 2006 QUOTE(southsideirish71 @ May 2, 2006 -> 12:18 PM) We won the division last year because we attacked our division. Our sunday lineups were for other teams. We changed our rotation middle of the season so the top of our rotation would face our division more. We were not resting 3 and 4 starters against the Indians and the Twins last year. We were on certain days. We weren't playing the starting 9 every single game against CLE and MIN, thats for damn sure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts